ADVANCEMENTS IN PEDIATRIC IMAGING: A REVIEW OF TECHNIQUES FOR REDUCING RADIATION EXPOSURE

Main Article Content

Suad Hamadi Al Talhi
Nawaf Hossain Khabrani
Zahra Abdulmohsen Al Khamis
Shatha Magboul Alzaidi
Jasser Ahmed Alghamdi
Abdulmajeed Hussain Zughaibi
Adil Mohmmed Al Tamimi
Abed Aqel Al-Zaidi
Abdullah Mushabbab Alqahtani

Keywords

pediatric imaging, techniques, radiation exposure

Abstract

Pediatric imaging is a crucial component of medical diagnostics, offering vital insights into various medical conditions affecting children. However, the associated risks of ionizing radiation exposure have prompted significant advancements in imaging techniques aimed at minimizing this exposure while maintaining diagnostic accuracy. Recent technological innovations, including digital radiography and computed tomography (CT) equipped with dose-reduction software, have been central to these efforts. These technologies not only reduce radiation doses but also improve image quality, enhancing the diagnostic process. Advancements such as the application of advanced software algorithms enhance image clarity and detail. The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in image analysis improves the detection of subtle abnormalities, potentially reducing the need for repeat scans and further lowering radiation exposure. Additionally, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) has been adapted for pediatric use, providing detailed images with minimal radiation. These advancements are complemented by protocol optimization strategies tailored specifically for pediatric patients, which adjust imaging parameters based on individual needs to minimize unnecessary radiation exposure. Challenges such as the cost of new technologies, the need for standardized protocols across institutions, and the importance of specialized training for healthcare professionals are significant. The continued development and integration of innovative imaging technologies are crucial for enhancing pediatric patient care. As these technologies evolve, they promise to further refine diagnostic accuracy and reduce health risks, ensuring that pediatric imaging remains a safe and effective tool for diagnosing and managing health conditions in children.

Abstract 361 | PDF Downloads 133

References

1. Frush DP, Donnelly LF, Rosen NS. Computed tomography and radiation risks: what pediatric health care providers should know. Pediatrics. 2003;112(4):951-957.
2. Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography — an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:2277-2284.
3. Seibert JA, Morin RL. The standardized exposure index for digital radiography: an opportunity for optimization of radiation dose to the pediatric population. Pediatric radiology. 2011 May;41:573-81.
4. Goske MJ, Applegate KE, Boylan J, et al. The Image Gently campaign: working together to change practice. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;190:273-274
5. Donnelly LF. Pediatric Imaging E-Book: The Fundamentals. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2011 Oct 17.
6. Strauss KJ, Kaste SC. The ALARA (as low as reasonably achievable) concept in pediatric interventional and fluoroscopic imaging: striving to keep radiation doses as low as possible during fluoroscopy of pediatric patients—a white paper executive summary. Radiology. 2006 Sep;240(3):621-2.
7. Mulkens TH, Broers C, Fieuws S, Termote JL, Bellnick P. Comparison of effective doses for low-dose MDCT and radiographic examination of sinuses in children. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2005 May;184(5):1611-8.
8. Frush DP, Soden B, Frush KS, Lowry C. Improved pediatric multidetector body CT using a size-based color-coded format. American journal of roentgenology. 2002 Mar;178(3):721-6.
9. Kalra MK, Maher MM, Toth TL, et al. Techniques and applications of automatic tube current modulation for CT. Radiology. 2004;233:649-657
10. Donnelly LF, Emery KH, Brody AS, et al. Minimizing radiation dose for pediatric body applications of single-detector helical CT: strategies at a large children's hospital. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;176:303-306.
11. Huda W, Ogden KM, Khorasani MR. Converting dose-length product to effective dose at CT. Radiology. 2008;248:995-1003.
12. Qurashi A, Rainford L, Ajlan A, Khashoggi K, Ashkar L, Al-Raddadi M, Al-Ghamdi M, Al-Thobaiti M, Foley S. Optimal abdominal CT protocol for obese patients. Radiography. 2018 Feb 1;24(1):e1-2.
13. Lehnert T, Naguib NN, Korkusuz H, Bauer RW, Kerl JM, Mack MG, Vogl TJ. Image-quality perception as a function of dose in digital radiography. American journal of roentgenology. 2011 Dec;197(6):1399-403.
14. Ranschaert ER, Morozov S, Algra PR, editors. Artificial intelligence in medical imaging: opportunities, applications and risks. Springer; 2019 Jan 29.
15. Brix R, Nissen-Meyer S, Nuran MR. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in pediatric radiology: A valuable technique for young patients. European Journal of Radiology. 2017;92:147-154