Integrating of Laboratory Testing in Nursing Practices: Enhancing Patient Care through Collaborative Diagnostics

Main Article Content

Kefayah Doweek Aldhaferi1 Aseel Mutlaq Alenazi2 Thani Zaban Alanzi3 Salwa Zaben Alanazi4 Abeer Hussin Alanazi5 Murtadha Essa Ali Alhafed6 Ali Mohammed Ibrahim AL Homood7 Waad Mohammad Hussain Hammami8 Mona Nahar Alshammari9 Badriah obad Alshammari10

Keywords

integrating, laboratory, testing, nursing practices, enhancing, patient, care, collaborative, diagnostics.

Abstract

Medical diagnoses rely on crucial information obtained via clinical laboratory tests. Producing precise and prompt test findings that are effectively conveyed to the treating physician, and ultimately the patient, is an essential element that promotes diagnostic excellence. Conversely, if this is not accomplished, it may result in diagnostic mistakes that are evident in the form of missed, delayed, and incorrect diagnoses.


Aim of work: To explore the role of integrating laboratory testing in nursing practices: in enhancing patient care through collaborative diagnostics.


Methods: Using the following search keywords, we performed a thorough search of the electronic literature in the MEDLINE database: integrating, laboratory, testing, nursing practices, enhancing, patient, care, collaborative, diagnostics.. To find relevant literature, the search was limited to articles from 2015 to 2021. We looked through scholarly articles related to my topic by doing a search on Google Scholar. Certain inclusion criteria influenced the articles that were chosen.


Results: The study's analysis included papers that were published between 2015 and 2021. The research was divided up into several parts, each having a header for the discussion portion.


Conclusion: A collaborative, inter-professional team supports high quality and safe care, patient and staff satisfaction and engagement, and organizational efficiency and innovation. Nurses can use the interpretation of laboratory results to improve their scope of practice by combining clinical reasoning and evidence-based practice. By understanding the causal relationship between diseases and their laboratory findings, nurses can make more informed decisions in patient care. This knowledge can help nurses identify when and what laboratory findings should be monitored, leading to more accurate assessments and appropriate treatments. This can enhance communication between nurses and patients, allowing for better patient education and engagement in their own healthcare. Overall, the interpretation of laboratory results empowers nurses to provide more effective and comprehensive care to their patients

Abstract 161 | PDF Downloads 87

References

Alper, B. S., & Haynes, R. B. (2016). EBHC pyramid 5.0 for accessing preappraised evidence and guidance. BMJ evidence-based medicine, 21(4), 123-125.
Arthurs, B. J., Mohan, V., McGrath, K., Scholl, G., & Gold, J. A. (2018). Impact of passive laboratory alerts on navigating electronic health records in intensive care simulations. SAGE Open, 8(2), 2158244018774388.
Bauer, L., & Bodenheimer, T. (2017). Expanded roles of registered nurses in primary care delivery of the future. Nursing outlook, 65(5), 624-632.
Campbell, B., Linzer, G., & Dufour, D. R. (2014). Lab Tests Online and consumer understanding of laboratory testing. Clinica Chimica Acta, 432, 162-165.
Cappelletti, P. (2017). Brain-to-brain loop: is the Lunberg concept useful in 2020?. La Rivista Italiana della Medicina di Laboratorio-Italian Journal of Laboratory Medicine, 13, 127-133.
Emilsson, M., Ernstson, U., Gustavsson, L., & Svensson, A. (2020). Sustainable innovations in small enterprises for the transformation of the primary healthcare sector. Sustainability, 12(16), 6391.
Hanscom, R., Small, M., & Lambrecht, A. (2018). Diagnostic accuracy: room for improvement. Boston, MA: Coverys.
Hickner, J., Thompson, P. J., Wilkinson, T., Epner, P., Shaheen, M., Pollock, A. M., ... & Taylor, J. R. (2014). Primary care physicians' challenges in ordering clinical laboratory tests and interpreting results. The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, 27(2), 268-274.
Hughey, J. J., & Colby, J. M. (2019). Discovering cross-reactivity in urine drug screening immunoassays through large-scale analysis of electronic health records. Clinical Chemistry, 65(12), 1522-1531.
Krasowski, M. D., Grieme, C. V., Cassady, B., Dreyer, N. R., Wanat, K. A., Hightower, M., & Nepple, K. G. (2017). Variation in results release and patient portal access to diagnostic test results at an academic medical center. Journal of pathology informatics, 8(1), 45.
Lippi, G., & Plebani, M. (2020). The critical role of laboratory medicine during coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and other viral outbreaks. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM), 58(7), 1063-1069.
Mathias, P. C., Conta, J. H., Konnick, E. Q., Sternen, D. L., Stasi, S. M., Cole, B. L., ... & Dickerson, J. A. (2016). Preventing genetic testing order errors with a laboratory utilization management program. American Journal of Clinical Pathology, 146(2), 221-226.
Morley, L., & Cashell, A. (2017). Collaboration in health care. Journal of medical imaging and radiation sciences, 48(2), 207-216.
Pelone, F., Harrison, R., Goldman, J., & Zwarenstein, M. (2017). Interprofessional collaboration to improve professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane database of systematic reviews, (6).
Plebani, M. (2015). Diagnostic errors and laboratory medicine–causes and strategies. Ejifcc, 26(1), 7.
Raebel, M. A., Shetterly, S. M., Bhardwaja, B., Sterrett, A. T., Schroeder, E. B., Chorny, J., ... & Lubin, I. M. (2020). Technology-enabled outreach to patients taking high-risk medications reduces a quality gap in completion of clinical laboratory testing. Population health management, 23(1), 3-11.
Rosen, M. A., DiazGranados, D., Dietz, A. S., Benishek, L. E., Thompson, D., Pronovost, P. J., & Weaver, S. J. (2018). Teamwork in healthcare: Key discoveries enabling safer, high-quality care. American Psychologist, 73(4), 433.
Sbaffi, L., & Rowley, J. (2017). Trust and credibility in web-based health information: a review and agenda for future research. Journal of medical Internet research, 19(6), e218.
Sim, J. J., Batech, M., Danforth, K. N., Rutkowski, M. P., Jacobsen, S. J., & Kanter, M. H. (2017). End-stage renal disease outcomes among the Kaiser Permanente Southern California Creatinine Safety Program (Creatinine SureNet): opportunities to reflect and improve. Perm J, 21(1), 16-143.
Sim, J. J., Rutkowski, M. P., Selevan, D. C., Batech, M., Timmins, R., Slezak, J. M., ... & Kanter, M. H. (2015). Kaiser permanente creatinine safety program: a mechanism to ensure widespread detection and care for chronic kidney disease. The American journal of medicine, 128(11), 1204-1211.
Tan, S. S. L., & Goonawardene, N. (2017). Internet health information seeking and the patient-physician relationship: a systematic review. Journal of medical Internet research, 19(1), e9.
Trenti, T. (2018). An evidence-based laboratory medicine approach to evaluate new laboratory tests. EJIFCC, 29(4), 259.
Watson, I. D., Wilkie, P., Hannan, A., & Beastall, G. H. (2018). Role of laboratory medicine in collaborative healthcare. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM), 57(1), 134-142.
Whitehead, N. S., Williams, L., Meleth, S., Kennedy, S., Ubaka-Blackmoore, N., Kanter, M., ... & Graber, M. L. (2019). The effect of laboratory test–based clinical decision support tools on medication errors and adverse drug events: a laboratory medicine best practices systematic review. The journal of applied laboratory medicine, 3(6), 1035-1048.
Yeung, K. (2021). The health care sector’s experience of blockchain: A cross-disciplinary investigation of its real transformative potential. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(12), e24109.