SYNERGY IN SPECIALTY CARE: INTEGRATING HEALTH DISCIPLINES FOR ENHANCED PATIENT OUTCOMES

Main Article Content

Yosef Hasan Taher Alhashem
Mousa Hassan A Alawadh
Mohammed Abdrabarasool Saleh Albrahim
Jasem Ahmed Al Mubarak
Bayan Ahmed Alghamdi
Saleh Abdulkhaliq Alzaid
Majed Fayadh Shihatah
Ahmed Faraj Samil Aloufi
Sami Saud Almutairi
Adel Fahad Rashid Alrubaysh
Khaled Helal Alharbi
Sharaf Amer alotaibi
Reema Hamad Alsahli

Keywords

Specialty Care, Health Disciplines, Patient Outcomes, Comprehensive Assessment

Abstract

The healthcare system's need for care services has evolved, which is facilitating a seamless shift from in-hospital to primary care. In this sense, patient-centered care delivery models may offer a framework for tracking patients' experiences as they move between various care tiers. Understanding the viewpoints of patients, primary care physicians (PCPs), and specialists—also known as the specialty care "triad"—is essential for the successful coordination of specialized care. Using diabetes specialist care as an illustration, this study compared these viewpoints in an integrated healthcare system using qualitative approaches. Inter-clinician contacts were essential for care coordination between PCPs and endocrinologists. When clinicians conceptualized specialist care coordination, they hardly ever included patients or other staff members. Patients frequently took on the role of specialist care coordinators, but they had difficulty making it work. 


Aim: To show Synergy in Specialty Care and Integrating Health Disciplines for Enhanced Patient Outcomes


 

Abstract 188 | PDF Downloads 55

References

1. Vimalananda, V. G., Dvorin, K., Fincke, B. G., Tardiff, N., & Bokhour, B. G. (2018). Patient, primary care provider, and specialist perspectives on Specialty Care Coordination in an integrated health care system. Journal of Ambulatory Care Management, 41(1), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1097/jac.0000000000000219
2. Ezeonwu, M. C. (2018). Specialty-care access for Community Health Clinic Patients: Processes and barriers. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, Volume 11, 109–119. https://doi.org/10.2147/jmdh.s152594
3. Indus Medical. (2023). The difference between Primary Care & Specialty Care. Primary Care vs. Specialty Care: Understanding the Difference. https://indusmedicalassociates.com/blogs/the-difference-between-primary-care--specialty-care
4. Comunale, M. J., Lerch, W., & Reynolds, B. (2021). Integrating advanced practice providers into Value Based Care Strategies: One organization’s journey to achieve success through Interprofessional Collaboration. Journal of Interprofessional Education & Practice, 22, 100384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xjep.2020.100384
5. Leeftink, A. G., Bikker, I. A., Vliegen, I. M., & Boucherie, R. J. (2018). Multi-disciplinary Planning in Health Care: A Review. Health Systems, 9(2), 95–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/20476965.2018.1436909
6. Aronoff-Spencer, E., Asgari, P., Finlayson, T. L., Gavin, J., Forstey, M., Norman, G. J., Pierce, I., Ochoa, C., Downey, P., Becerra, K., & Agha, Z. (2020). A comprehensive assessment for community-based, person-centered care for older adults. BMC Geriatrics, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-020-1502-7
7. ElSayed, N. A., Aleppo, G., Aroda, V. R., Bannuru, R. R., Brown, F. M., Bruemmer, D., Collins, B. S., Cusi, K., Hilliard, M. E., Isaacs, D., Johnson, E. L., Kahan, S., Khunti, K., Leon, J., Lyons, S. K., Perry, M. L., Prahalad, P., Pratley, R. E., Seley, J. J., … Gabbay, R. A. (2022). 4. Comprehensive Medical Evaluation and assessment of comorbidities:standards of care in diabetes—2023. Diabetes Care, 46(Supplement_1). https://doi.org/10.2337/dc23-s004
8. NSW Health. (2022). Comprehensive assessment. Physical health care for people living with mental health issues. https://www.health.nsw.gov.au/mentalhealth/professionals/physical-health-care/Pages/comprehensive-assessment.aspx
9. Bernard Ramirez. (2024). Comprehensive assessment & example: Free PDF download. Comprehensive Assessment & Example | Free PDF Download. https://www.carepatron.com/templates/comprehensive-assessments
10. Menear, M., Girard, A., Dugas, M., Gervais, M., Gilbert, M., & Gagnon, M.-P. (2022). Personalized Care Planning and shared decision making in collaborative care programs for depression and anxiety disorders: A systematic review. PLOS ONE, 17(6). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268649
11. Glare, P., & Appleyard, W. J. (2023). Collaborative treatment planning. Person Centered Medicine, 207–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17650-0_12
12. Sharkiya, S. H. (2023). Quality communication can improve patient-centred health outcomes among older patients: A rapid review. BMC Health Services Research, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09869-8
13. Świątoniowska-Lonc, N., Polański, J., Tański, W., & Jankowska-Polańska, B. (2020). Impact of satisfaction with physician–patient communication on self-care and adherence in patients with hypertension: Cross-sectional study. BMC Health Services Research, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05912-0
14. Bastemeijer, C. M., Boosman, H., van Ewijk, H., de Jong-Verweij, L. M., Voogt, L., & Hazelzet, J. (2019).

patient experiences: A systematic review of quality improvement interventions in a hospital setting

. Patient Related Outcome Measures, Volume 10, 157–169. https://doi.org/10.2147/prom.s201737
15. Oben, P. (2020). Understanding the patient experience: A conceptual framework. Journal of Patient Experience, 7(6), 906–910. https://doi.org/10.1177/2374373520951672