PROBLEM IN AMOEBIASIS DIAGNOSIS IN CLINICAL SETTING: A REVIEW FROM CONVENTIONAL MICROSCOPY TO ADVANCE MOLECULAR BASED DIAGNOSIS
Main Article Content
Keywords
.
Abstract
Amebiasis is an infection of the large intestine, and sometimes the liver and other organs, caused by a single-celled parasite (protozoa) Entamoeba histolytica, or amoeba. Amoebiasis, an intestinal protozoan disease caused by the bacterium Entamoeba histolytica, is a public health problem. Amoebiasis tends to occur in areas where sanitation is inadequate. About 50 million people around the world are infected with amebiasis each year, and it causes approximately 100,000 deaths. Therefore, laboratory detection of pathogenic E. histolytica bacteria and distinguishing them from non-pathogenic bacteria plays a crucial role in treating patients. The most sensitive methods for laboratory diagnosis of intestinal amebiasis include a variety of ELISA tests. To diagnose amebiasis, your doctor will collect stool samples for analysis. The best way is to test the stool for a protein released by the amoeba (antigen tests), or to use the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique to detect the genetic material of the amoeba in the stool. This technique produces copies of Many of the amoeba's genetic material, thus making the amoeba easier to detect. Antigen tests or polymerase chain reaction (PCR) are more useful than microscopic examination of stool samples, which are often inconclusive. Laboratory diagnosis of extraintestinal amebiasis is challenged by the lack of definitive detection of current infections and commercially available point-of-care tests. For both types of amebiasis, there is still a need for sensitive, highly specific, rapid and cost-effective tests for use in developing countries where the disease is common. In recent years, new molecules of diagnostic value have been discovered and new tests have been developed. Advances in “omics” technologies allow the discovery of new biomarkers that may help differentiate between different stages of infection.
References
2. Ling Vay e medicine. Com, 2004.
3. 3-Sharma M.P. and Ahuja V. Amebic liver abscess. JIACM; 2: 107-111, 2003.
4. Cabalero J; Viveros M. and Salvatierra B. Seroepidemiology of amebiasis in Mexico. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg; 50: 412-419, 1998.
5. Tierney L.M; Mcphee S.J. and Papadolis M.A. Current: Medical diagnosis and treatment. 37th. ed.; 1327-1332, 1998.
6. Haque R; Ali I.K.M. and Petri W.A.Jr. Diagnosis of amebic liver abscess and intestinal infection with the Tech Lab Entamoeba histolytica, antigen detection and antibody tests. J. Clin. Microbiol; 38: 3235-3239, 2000.
7. Angel C; Chand N. and Sankar A. Gastric wall erosion by an amebic liver abscess in a 3 years old girl. Pediatr Surg. Int; 16; 429-430, 2000.
8. Restrepo M.I; Restrepo Z. and Aguirre A. Diagnostic tests for 39 cases of liver Abscess: comparison of ELISA and CIE. Rev. Sac. Bras. Med. Trop; 29: 27-32, 1996.
9. Niscigorska J. and Kaczmarsks A. Amoebic liver abscess Personal Observation. Przegl Epidemiol; 50: 281-286, 1996.
10. Tanyuksel, Mehmet, and William A. Petri Jr. "Laboratory diagnosis of amebiasis." Clinical microbiology reviews 16.4 (2003): 713-729.
11. Fotedar, R., et al. "Laboratory diagnostic techniques for Entamoeba species." Clinical microbiology reviews 20.3 (2007): 511-532.
12. Nath, Joyobrato, Sankar K. Ghosh, and Baby Singha. "Problem in amoebiasis diagnosis in clinical setting: a review from conventional microscopy to advance molecular based diagnosis." J. Acad. Indus. Res 2 (2013): 257-261.
13. Parsons, Linda M., et al. "Laboratory diagnosis of tuberculosis in resource-poor countries: challenges and opportunities." Clinical microbiology reviews 24.2 (2011): 314-350.
14. Cook, G. C. "Diagnostic procedures in the investigation of infectious diarrhoea." Baillière's clinical gastroenterology 7.2 (1993): 421-449.
15. Joseph, K. H., V. L. Parmar, and N. B. Manvar. "Diagnosis of Parasitic Infection through Faecal Examination."
16. Pritt, Bobbi S. "Molecular diagnostics in the diagnosis of parasitic infection." Methods in Microbiology. Vol. 42. Academic Press, 2015. 111-160.
17. Shnawa, Bushra Hussain. "Molecular diagnosis of Entamoeba histolytica, Entamoeba dispar, and Entamoeba moshkovskii: An update review." Annual Research & Review in Biology 21.5 (2017): 1-12.
18. MacMillan, A. P. A. A. "Conventional serological tests." Animal brucellosis 206 (1990): 153-197.
19. Ngui, Romano, et al. "Differentiating Entamoeba histolytica, Entamoeba dispar and Entamoeba moshkovskii using nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in rural communities in Malaysia." Parasites & vectors 5 (2012): 1-7.
20. Neumaier, Michael, et al. "Fundamentals of quality assessment of molecular amplification methods in clinical diagnostics." Clinical chemistry 44.1 (1998): 12-26.
21. Mallewa, Macpherson. Central Nervous System Infections at Queen Elizabeth Central Hopsital Paediatric Unit, Blantyre, Malawi. The University of Liverpool (United Kingdom), 2009.
22. Metzker, Michael L. "Emerging technologies in DNA sequencing." Genome research 15.12 (2005): 1767-1776.
23. França, Lilian TC, Emanuel Carrilho, and Tarso BL Kist. "A review of DNA sequencing techniques." Quarterly reviews of biophysics 35.2 (2002): 169-200.