Improving Patient Outcomes: The Impact of Evidence Based Nursing Practices
Main Article Content
Keywords
.
Abstract
Nursing care plays a pivotal role in achieving optimal patient outcomes. High-quality nursing care is essential for achieving optimal patient outcomes. Evidence-based practices (EBPs) represent the gold standard for care by incorporating the best available research evidence into clinical decision making. However, consistent adoption of EBPs remains a challenge in many healthcare settings. The purpose of this study to evaluate the relationship between nursing adherence to EBPs and important patient outcomes across medical, surgical, critical care, maternal-child, and behavioral health units.
Evidence-based nursing practices have been shown to significantly improve important patient outcomes across various clinical settings. When nurses adhere to interventions that are supported by scientific evidence, patients experience fewer complications, shorter hospital stays, lower readmission rates, and reduced mortality.
Aretrospective review of 10,000 randomly selected patient records from January 2017 to December 2019 at a large academic medical center was conducted. The hospital employs over 5,000 nurses and sees over 80,000 admissions annually. Nursing adherence measured to 18 core EBPs using the Evidence-Based Practice Assessment Tool (EBPAT), a valid and reliable 38-item instrument. The EBPAT assesses adherence across five domains: assessment, planning, implementation, evaluation, and health promotion/disease prevention. Patient outcomes included length of stay, in-hospital complications, 30-day readmissions, and in-hospital mortality.
Higher total EBPAT scores, indicating greater nursing adherence to EBPs, were significantly associated with fewer complications, shorter hospital stays, lower 30-day readmission rates, and lower in-hospital mortality across all clinical areas. The greatest improvements were seen in critical care, where each additional point on the EBPAT scale was associated with a 0.5-day reduction in length of stay and a reduction in complications. No significant differences were found between clinical areas in the relationships between EBPAT scores and outcomes.
Our findings provide strong evidence that nursing adherence to EBPs positively impacts important patient outcomes. These results are consistent with previous studies showing associations between EBP implementation and reduced complications, shorter hospital stays, and lower mortality. Future prospective studies are needed to validate these relationships while controlling for potential confounders.
The review provides robust evidence that nursing adherence to evidence-based practices enhances important clinical outcomes for patients across various healthcare settings. These results align with previous research demonstrating links between EBP implementation and reduced complications, lengths of stay, and mortality.
In summary, higher nursing adherence to evidence-based practices as measured by the EBPAT was significantly associated with fewer complications, shorter hospital stays, lower readmission rates, and lower mortality across medical, surgical, critical care, maternal-child, and behavioral health units. These findings provide strong rationale for healthcare systems to invest in EBP training, implementation support, and culture change to optimize the quality and value of nursing care delivered. Larger prospective studies are still needed to establish causality while accounting for potential confounding factors.
References
Brown C, Hofer T, Johal A, et al. An epistemology of patient safety research: a framework for study design and interpretation. Part 3. End points and measurement. Qual Saf Health Care. 2008;17(3):170-177. doi:10.1136/qshc.2007.024928.
Baggs JG, Schmitt MH, Mushlin AI, et al. Association between nurse-physician collaboration and patient outcomes in three intensive care units. Crit Care Med. 1992;27(9):1991-1998.
Coyer F, Gardner A, Doubrovsky A, et al. Reducing pressure injuries in acute hospitals: successful implementation of evidence-based practice. J Eval Clin Pract. 2015;21(4):664-672. doi:10.1111/jep.12371.
Campbell MJ, Fitzpatrick R, Haines A, et al. Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health. BMJ. 2000;321(7262):694-696. doi:10.1136/bmj.321.7262.694.
Dang D, Dearholt S. Johns Hopkins nursing evidence-based practice: model and guidelines. 3rd ed. Indianapolis, IN: Sigma Theta Tau International; 2018.
Doran DI, Sidani S, Keatings M, Doidge D. An empirical test of the Nursing Role Effectiveness Model. J Adv Nurs. 2002;38(1):29-39. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.2002.02126.x.
Estabrooks CA, Rutakumwa W, O'Leary KA, Profetto-McGrath J, Milner M, Levers MJ, Scott-Findlay S. Sources of practice knowledge among nurses. Qual Health Res. 2005;15(4):460-476. doi:10.1177/1049732304273040.
Fineout-Overholt E, Melnyk BM, Stillwell SB, Williamson KM. Critical appraisal of the evidence: part I. Am J Nurs. 2010;110(7):47-52. doi: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000383935.22721.9e.
Fink R, Thompson CJ, Bonnes D. Overcoming barriers and promoting the use of research in practice. J Nurs Adm. 2005;35(3):121-129. doi:10.1097/00005110-200503000-00007.
Grol R, Grimshaw J. From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients' care. Lancet. 2003;362(9391):1225-1230. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14546-1.
Gifford W, Davies B, Edwards N, Griffin P, Lybanon V. Managerial leadership for nurses’ use of research evidence: an integrative review of the literature. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2007;4(3):126-145. doi:10.1111/j.1741-6787.2007.00089.x.
Healey F, Monro A, Cockram A, Adams V, Heseltine D. Using targeted risk factor reduction to prevent falls in older in-patients: a randomised controlled trial. Age Ageing. 2016;35(4):390-395. doi:10.1093/ageing/afj053.
Jack BW, Chetty VK, Anthony D, et al. A reengineered hospital discharge program to decrease rehospitalization: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150(3):178-187. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-150-3-200902030-00007.
Kritsonis A. Comparison of change theories. Int J Scholarly Acad Intellectual Diversity. 2005;8(1):1-7.
Kansagara D, Englander H, Salanitro A, et al. Risk prediction models for hospital readmission: a systematic review. JAMA. 2011;306(15):1688-1698. doi:10.1001/jama.2011.1515.
Melnyk BM, Fineout-Overholt E. Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare: A guide to best practice. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2011.
MelnykBM, Fineout-Overholt E, Gallagher-Ford L, Kaplan L. The state of evidence-based practice in US nurses: critical implications for nurse leaders and educators. J Nurs Adm. 2012;42(9):410-7.
Melnyk BM, Gallagher-Ford L, Long LE, Fineout-Overholt E. The establishment of evidence-based practice competencies for practicing registered nurses and advanced practice nurses in real-world clinical settings: proficiencies to improve healthcare quality, reliability, patient outcomes, and costs. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2014;11(1):5-15.
Melnyk BM, Fineout-Overholt E. Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare: A guide to best practice. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer; 2015.
Melnyk BM, Gallagher-Ford L, Thomas BK, Troseth M, Wyngarden K, Szalacha L. A study of chief nurse executives indicates low prioritization of evidence-based practice and shortcomings in hospital performance metrics across the United States. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2016;13(1):6-14.
Melnyk BM, Fineout-Overholt E, Giggleman M, Cruz R. Correlates among cognitive beliefs, EBP implementation, organizational culture, cohesion and job satisfaction in evidence-based practice mentors from a community hospital system. Nurs Outlook. 2010;58(6):301-8.
Melnyk BM, Gallagher-Ford L, Zellefrow C. The establishment of evidence-based practice competencies for baccalaureate students: lessons learned from a multiuniversity partnership. J Prof Nurs. 2018;34(6):423-430.
Melnyk BM, Fineout-Overholt E. Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare: a guide to best practice. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health; 2016.
Melnyk BM, Fineout-Overholt E, Stillwell SB, Williamson KM. Evidence-based practice: step by step: the seven steps of evidence-based practice. Am J Nurs. 2010;110(1):51-53. doi:10.1097/01.NAJ.0000366056.06605.d2.
Muscedere J, Dodek P, Keenan S, et al. Comprehensive evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for ventilator-associated pneumonia: prevention. J Crit Care. 2008;23(1):126-137. doi:10.1016/j.jcrc.2007.02.002.
Naylor MD, Brooten DA, Campbell RL, et al. Comprehensive discharge planning and home follow-up of hospitalized elders: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 1999;281(7):613-620. doi:10.1001/jama.281.7.613.
Olade RA. Evidence-based practice and research utilization activities among rural nurses. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2004;36(3):220-225. doi:10.1111/j.1547-5069.2004.04041.x.
Pravikoff DS, Pierce ST, Tanner A. Evidence-based practice readiness study supported by AcademyHealth. Clin Scholar Rev. 2005;5(4):325-37.
Rycroft-Malone J. The PARIHS framework—A framework for guiding the implementation of evidence-based practice. J Nurs Care Qual. 2004;19(4):297-304. doi:10.1097/00001786-200410000-00002.
Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA, Haynes RB, Richardson WS. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. BMJ. 1996;312(7023):71-72. doi:10.1136/bmj.312.7023.71.
Squires JE, Estabrooks CA, Gustavsson P, Wallin L. Individual determinants of research utilization by nurses: a systematic review update. Implement Sci. 2011;6:1. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-6-1.
Stokke K, Olsen NR, Espehaug B, Nortvedt MW. Evidence based practice beliefs and implementation among nurses: a cross-sectional study. BMC Nurs. 2014;13:8. doi:10.1186/1472-6955-13-8.
Titler MG, Kleiber C, Steelman VJ, et al. The Iowa model of evidence-based practice to promote quality care. Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am. 2001;13(4):497-509. doi:10.1016/s0899-5885(18)30017-0.
Umpierrez GE, Hellman R, Korytkowski MT, et al. Management of hyperglycemia in hospitalized patients in non-critical care setting: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;97(1):16-38. doi:10.1210/jc.2011-2098.
