Optimizing the Radiology Experience through Radiologist–Patient Interaction

Main Article Content

Mansour Mohammed Fahad Almajdi, Fahad Mujawwil Julaydan Alshammari, Ali Ibrahim Alanazi, Meshal Battal Atwan Alshammari, Badah Mayzar Mayzar Almutairi, Ahmed Hassan Almuttalib

Keywords

radiology, patient education, knee MRI

Abstract

This survey-based study aims to investigate patients' understanding of and expectations regarding radiologists in the outpatient setting, specifically focusing on knee magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at an urban, quaternary care academic medical center.


Materials and Methods: A comprehensive survey was administered to adult patients undergoing knee MRI over a one-year period at the specified medical center.


Results: The survey findings reveal that a minority of patients undergoing knee MRI during the study period were aware of the radiologist's role, aligning with existing literature. Only around one-third of patients anticipated meeting the radiologist during their radiology department visit for knee MRI. Although the majority of surveyed patients expressed a desire to contact the individual who interpreted their exam, only one patient did so during the study. However, six respondents from the follow-up group reported contacting the person who read their exam through various means.


Conclusion: Despite the majority of patients expressing a wish to communicate with the individual interpreting their knee MRI, actual contact with radiologists was limited. The study suggests that patients' understanding of the radiologist's role may influence their communication behaviors. The findings highlight the need to explore and address barriers in patient-radiologist communication in outpatient settings

Abstract 199 | pdf Downloads 50

References

1. Johnson AJ, Easterling D, Williams LS, Glover S, Frankel RM. Insight from patients for radiologists: improving our reporting systems. J Am Coll Radiol. 2009;6:786–794.
2. Johnson AJ, Frankel RM, Williams LS, Glover S, Easterling D. Patient access to radiology reports: what do physicians think? J Am Coll Radiol. 2010;7:281–289.
3. Johnson AJ, Easterling D, Nelson R, Chen MY, Frankel RM. Access to radiologic reports via a patient portal: clinical simulations to investigate patient preferences. J Am Coll Radiol. 2012;9:256–263.
4. Safdar N, Shet N, Bulas D, Knight N. Handoffs between radiologists and patients: threat or opportunity? J Am Coll Radiol. 2011;8:853–857.
5. Basu PA, Ruiz-Wibbelsmann JA, Spielman SB, Van Dalsem VF 3rd, Rosenberg JK, Glazer GM. Creating a patient-centered imaging service: determining what patients want. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196:605–610.
6. Mangano MD, Rahman A, Choy G, Sahani DV, Boland GW, Gunn AJ. Radiologists' role in the communication of imaging examination results to patients: perceptions and preferences of patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014;203:1034–1039.
7. Koney N, Roudenko A, Ro M, Bahl S, Kagen A. Patients want to meet with imaging experts. J Am Coll Radiol. 2016;13:465–470.
8. Cabarrus M, Naeger DM, Rybkin A, Qayyum A. Patients prefer results from the ordering provider and access to their radiology reports. J Am Coll Radiol. 2015;12:556–562.
9. Henshaw D, Okawa G, Ching K, Garrido T, Qian H, Tsai J. Access to radiology reports via an online patient portal: experiences of referring physicians and patients. J Am Coll Radiol. 2015;12:582–586.
10. Kuhlman M, Meyer M, Krupinski EA. Direct reporting of results to patients: the future of radiology? Acad Radiol. 2012;19:646–650.
11. Halbesleben JR, Whitman MV. Evaluating survey quality in health services research: a decision framework for assessing nonresponse bias. Health Serv Res. 2013;48:913–930.