SURFACE ROUGHNESS AND GLOSS OF CURRENT CAD/CAM RESIN COMPOSITES BEFORE AND AFTER TOOTHBRUSH ABRASION

Main Article Content

Ahmed Saleh Alfehaid
Mona Aqlaa Alenazi
Abeer Moahammed Alonizi
Nashmeah shweash Alenazi
Eman jamaan Alanazy
Rajaa Mohammed Alsalem
Gahan safer alotaibi
Munira Naif Thaar ALnefaie

Keywords

dentistry, restorative composite materials, wear, tooth brushing, surface roughness

Abstract

Objective: evaluate and compare the surface roughness of two different nano-hybrid composites composite before and after tooth brushing simulation.


Materials and Methods: Twenty dimensionally standardized composite specimens of two nano-hybrid resin composites (TetricEvoCeram and Admira Fusion) were used. Ten specimens from each composite group. All specimens were polished and then subjected to a tooth brushing simulator wear test. Surface roughness (Ra) were measured before tooth brushing and after 5000, 10, 000, 15, 000, and 20, 000 tooth brushing cycles. The data was analysed using two-way ANOVA to assess surface roughness values and pair wise comparisons in the form of Tukey post hoctests were performed to interpret main effects. Results: For all tested materials, surface roughness increased after tooth brushing wear test. Surface roughness (Ra) values ranged from 0.17 to 0.22 µm at baseline and increased to between 0.44 and 0.49 µm after 20, 000 tooth brushing cycles. The lowest initial Ra value was detected in TetricEvoCeram.


Conclusions: Simulated tooth brushing wear led to an increase in surface roughness for all tested composite materials. TetricEvoCeram had smoother surface after polishing and following 20, 000 cycles of tooth brushing wear whereas, Admira Fusion demonstrated rougher surface before and after tooth brushing abrasion.

Abstract 141 | PDF Downloads 83

References

1. Randolph LD, Palin WM, Leloup G, Leprince JG. Filler characteristics of modern dental resin composites and their influence on physic-mechanical properties. Dent Mater.2016; 32: 1586–99.
2. Brunton, P. A., Ratnayake, J., Loch C., Veerasamy A., Cathro, P., Lee R. Indirect restorations and fixed prosthodontics: Ma-terialsand techniques used by general dentists of New Zealand. Int. J. Dent.2019, 2, 5210162.
3. AlAli, M.; Silikas, N.; Satterthwaite, J. The Effects of ToothbrushWear on the Surface Roughness and Gloss of Resin Composites with Various Types of Matrices. Dent. J.2021, 9, 8.
4. Kim, K. H.; Ong, J. L.; Okuno, O. The effect of filler loading and morphology on the mechanical properties of contemporary composites. J. Prosthet. Dent.2002, 87, 642–649.
5. Morgan, M. Finishing and polishing of direct posterior resin restorations. Pract. Proced. Aesthetic Dent.2004, 16, 211–234.
6. Tanoue N, Matsumara H, Atsuta M. Wear and surface roughness of current prosthetic composites after tooth brushing/dentifrice abrasion. J Prosthet Dent 2000 Jul; 84 (1): 93-6.
7. Jones, C. S.; Billington, R. W.; Pearson, G. J. The in vivom perception of roughness of restorations. Br. Dent. J.2004, 196, 42–45.
8. Whitehead SA, Shearer AC, Watts DC, Wilson NHF. Surface texture changes of a composite brushed with “tooth whitening” dentifrices. Dent Mater 1996 Sep; 12 (5): 315-8.
9. Moszner N, Salz U. New developments of polymeric dental composites. Prog Polym Sci, 2001; 26: 535-76.
10. Lefever, D.; Perakis, N.; Roig, M.; Krejci, I.; Ardu, S. The effect of tooth brushing on surface gloss of resin composites. Am. J. Dent.2012, 25, 54–58.
11. Jefferies, S. R. The art and science of abrasive finishing and polishing in restorative dentistry. Dent. Clin. N. Am.1998, 42, 613–627.
12. Bollen CML, Lambrechts P, Quirynen M. Comparison of surface roughness of oral hard materials to the threshold surface roughness for bacterial plaque retention: A review of the literature. Dent Mater 1997; 13 (4): 258-69.
13. Kusy RP, Leinfelder KF. Pattern of wear in posterior composite restorations. J Dent Res 1977 May; 56 (5): 544.
14. Van Dijken JWV, Stadigh J, Meurman JH. Appearance of finished and unfinished composite surfaces after tooth brushing. A scanning electron microscopy study. Acta OdontolScand 1983 Dec; 41 (6): 377-83.
15. Da Costa, J.; Adams-Belusko, A.; Riley, K.; Ferracane, J. L. The effect of various dentifrices on surface roughness and gloss of resin composites. J. Dent.2010, 38, e123–e128.
16. Cunha, L. G.; Alonso, R. C. B.; Dos Santos, P. H.; Sinhoreti, M. A. C. Comparative study of the surface roughness of Ormocer-based and conventional composites. J. Appl. Oral Sci.2003, 11, 348–353.