EXPLORING THE POTENTIAL OF CELTIS AETNENSIS COMPOUNDS THROUGH MOLECULAR DOCKING FOR HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA.
Main Article Content
Keywords
Celtis aetnensis, Auto dock 4.2, GCMS, Cancer, eicosatetraenoic acid, Promethazine sulfoxide, Sulfadoxine
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) accounts for 1% of the liver malignances; HCC progresses in hepatocytes primarily as a result of inflammation, oxidative stress, and primary liver disease. Thanks to the in-silico methods that help in the identification of the targets and the drugs/potential drugs that can inhibit these proteins that cater to the growth of the cancer cells. Plant actives have been long considered as potential sources of anticancer drugs. In this regard, we studied the actives from Celtis tournefortii Lam (Celtis aetnensis) using GCMS analysis. The protein structures of three receptors—NF-B P50 homodimer, FGF receptor 4, and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2)—were then subjected to docking studies using phytocompounds from Celtis aetnensis. Three receptor proteins were used in the docking analysis against
7 ligands. In this study, the PDB was used to obtain the structures of 3 cancer-related receptor proteins. The proteins were produced by eliminating water molecules, ligands using PyMol, and were then exposed to docking experiments. Docking studies revealed that the compounds with a binding energy ranging from -1.83 kcal/mol to -6.12 kcal/mol. The docking results revealed that eicosatetraenoic acid has a binding energy of-6.12 kcal/mol against the FGFR4 receptor. Sulfadoxine's binding energy to the VEGFR2 receptor protein was-4.9 kcal/mol. Promethazine sulfoxide docks with an energy of -5.36 kcal/mol against NFKB P50. By attaching to the protein, these substances demonstrated good inhibitory activity. The results are supportive that these compounds may be used to treat HCC.
References
2. Caillot F, Derambure C, Bioulac-Sage P, et al. Transient and etiology related transcription regulation in cirrhosis prior to hepatocellular carcinoma occurrence. World J Gastroenterol 2009; 15:300– 309.
3. Lian L, Li XL, Xu MD et al. VEGFR2 promotes tumorigenesis and metastasis in a pro-angiogenic-independent way in gastric cancer. BMC cancer. 2019 Dec;19(1):1-5.
4. Liu Y, Wang C, Li J, Zhu J, Zhao C, Xu H. Novel regulatory factors and small-molecule inhibitors of FGFR4 in cancer. Frontiers in Pharmacology. 2021 Apr 26; 12:633453.
5. Mittal S, El-Serag HB. Epidemiology of hepatocellular carcinoma: consider the population. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2013;47 Suppl (0): S2-S6.
6. Xia Y, Shen S, Verma IM. NF-κB, an active player in human cancers. Cancer immunology research. 2014 Sep;2(9):823-30.
7. Xia L, Tan S, Zhou Y, et al. Role of the NFκB-signaling pathway in cancer. OncoTargets and therapy. 2018 Apr 11:2063-73.
8. Mukund V, Behera SK, Alam A, Nagaraju GP. Molecular docking analysis of nuclear factor-κB and genistein interaction in the context of breast cancer. Bioinformation. 2019;15(1):11.
9. Sudha KN, Shakira M, Prasanthi P, Sarika N, Kumar CN and Babu PA (2008). Virtual screening for novel COX-2 inhibitors using the ZINC database. Bioinformation, 2(8): 325-329.
10. Vyas V, Jain A, Jain A and Gupta A (2008). Virtual screening: a fast tool for drug design. Sci Pharm. 76(3):333-60.
11. Kitchen DB, Decornez H, Furr JR and Bajorath J (2004). Docking and scoring in virtual screening for drug discovery: methods and applications. Nat Rev Drug Discov, 3(11): 935-949.
12. Thavamani BS, Mathew M, Dhanabal SP. Cocculus hirsutus: Molecular docking to identify suitable targets for hepatocellular carcinoma by in silico technique. Pharmacognosy Magazine. 2016 May;12(Suppl 3): S350.
13. Song C, Gu X, Li R. Expression of IRAK1 in Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Its Clinical Significance, and Docking Characteristics with Selected Natural Compounds. Current Oncology. 2022 Nov 18;29(11):8904-16.
14. SAMANT L, Javle V. Comparative docking analysis of rational drugs against COVID-19 main protease.
15. Chu YH, Li Y, Wang YT, Li B, Zhang YH. Investigation of interaction modes involved in alkaline phosphatase and organophosphorus pesticides via molecular simulations. Food chemistry. 2018 Jul 15; 254:80-6.