Medication Administration Time Study (MATS) Health care Staff Performance of Medication Administration
Main Article Content
Keywords
.
Abstract
This study aimed to develop and validate a method for evaluating nursing effort and workflow in the medication administration process within a pediatric hospital setting.
Background: Medication errors contribute significantly to patient morbidity and mortality, highlighting the importance of robust systems for medication administration. While bar-coding medication administration systems are commonly used to reduce errors, there is a lack of comprehensive pre-implementation workflow data specific to pediatric hospitals, hindering the evaluation of system effectiveness.
Method: A descriptive observational study was conducted involving 180 nurses across pediatric units in a tertiary care pediatric hospital. A total of 1200 unique medication observations were made to assess nursing effort and workflow during medication administration.
Results: The study revealed that nurses spent an average of 20 minutes per medication pass, with frequent interruptions and distractions during the process. These challenges posed significant threats to patient safety, leading to potential workarounds and workflow inefficiencies.
Conclusion: The findings highlight the critical need for tailored interventions and workflow optimizations in pediatric medication administration processes to mitigate risks, enhance patient safety, and improve overall workflow efficiency.
References
2. Bates, D. W., Spell, N., & Cullen, D. J. (1997). The cost of adverse drug events in hospitalized patients. JAMA, 277, 307-311.
3. Keohane, C. A., Bane, A. D., Featherstone, E., et al. (2008). Quantifying nursing workflow in medication administration. J Nurs Adm, 38(1), 19-26.
4. Institute of Medicine. (2006). Preventing medication errors: report brief. Retrieved from http://www.iom.edu/File.aspx?ID=35943. Accessed October 29, 2008.
5. Leape, L., Bates, D., & Cullen, D. (1995). Systems analysis of adverse drug events. JAMA, 274, 35-43.
6. Heinen, M. G., Coyle, G. A., & Hamilton, A. V. (2003). Barcoding makes its mark on daily practice. Nurs Manage, 10, 18.
7. Carayon, P., Wetterneck, T., Shoofs Hundt, A., et al. (2004). Assessing nurse interaction with medication administration technologies: the development of observation methodologies. Retrieved from http://www.ahrq.gov/downloads/pub/advances/vol12/Carayon.pdf. Accessed October 29, 2008.
8. Barker, K. N., Flynn, E. A., Pepper, G. A., Bates, D. W., & Mikeal, R. L. (2002). Medication errors observed in 36 healthcare facilities. Arch Intern Med, 162(16), 1897-1903.
9. Flynn, E. A., Barker, K. N., Pepper, G. A., Bates, D. W., & Mikeal, R. L. (2002). Comparison of methods for detecting medication errors in 36 hospitals and skilled-nursing facilities. Am J Health Syst Pharm, 59(5), 436-446.
10. Pape, T. M., Guerra, D. M., Muzquiz, M., et al. (2005). Innovative approaches to reducing nurses’ distractions during medication administration. J Contin Educ Nurs, 36(3), 108-116
Article Sidebar
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
All articles published in JPTCP are licensed under Copyright Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
