ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS: QUALITY OF NURSING DOCUMENTATION: PAPER‐BASED HEALTH RECORDS VERSUS ELECTRONIC‐BASED HEALTH RECORDS
Main Article Content
Keywords
electronic health records and audit instruments, paper-based, process, quality of nursing documentation, structure.
Abstract
objectives: To assess and compare the quality of paper-based and electronic-based health records. The comparison examined three criteria: content, documentation process and structure.
Background: Nursing documentation is a significant indicator of the quality of patient care delivery. It can be either paper-based or organized within the system known as the electronic health records. Nursing documentation must be completed at the highest standards, to ensure the safety and quality of healthcare services.
However, the evidence is not clear on which one of the two forms of documentation (paper-based versus electronic health records is more qualified.
Methods: A retrospective, descriptive, comparative design was used to address the
study’s purposes. A convenient number of patients’ records, from two public hospitals, were audited using the Cat-ch-Ing audit instrument. The sample size consisted
of 434 records for both paper-based health records and electronic health records
from medical and surgical wards.
Results: Electronic health records were better than paper-based health records in
terms of process and structure. In terms of quantity and quality content, paper based records were better than electronic health records. The study affirmed the
poor quality of nursing documentation and lack of nurses’ knowledge and skills in the nursing process and its application in both paper-based and electronic-based systems.
Conclusion: Both forms of documentation revealed drawbacks in terms of content,process and structure. This study provided important information, which can guide policymakers and administrators in identifying effective strategies aimed at enhancing the quality of nursing documentation.
Relevance to clinical practice: Policies and actions to ensure quality nursing documentation at the national level should focus on improving nursing knowledge, competencies, practice in nursing process, enhancing the work environment and nursing workload, as well as strengthening the capacity building of nursing practice to improve the quality of nursing care and patients’ outcomes.
References
2. Ajami, S., & Bagheri-Tadi, T. (2013). Barriers for adopting electronic health records (EHRs) by physicians. Acta Informatica Medica, 21, 129–134.
3. Albarrak, A. I., Al Rashidi, E. A., Fatani, R. K., Al Ageel, S. I., & Mohammed, R. (2014). Assessment of legibility and completeness of handwritten and electronic prescriptions. Saudi Pharmaceutical Jour- nal, 22, 522–527.
4. Asamani, J. A., Amenorpe, F. D., Babanawo, F., & Ansah Ofei, A. M. (2014). Nursing documentation of inpatient care in eastern Ghana. British Journal of Nursing, 23, 48–54.
5. Bjorvell, C., Thorell-Ekstrand, I., & Wredling, R. (2000). Development of an audit instrument for nursing care plans in the patient record. Qual- ity in Health Care, 9, 6–13.
6. Bruylands, M., Paans, W., Hediger, H., & Mu€ller-Staub, M. (2013). Effects on the quality of the nursing care process through an educational program and the use of electronic nursing documentation. Interna- tional Journal of Nursing Knowledge, 24, 163–170.
7. Coffey, C., Wurster, L. A., Groner, J., Hoffman, J., Hendren, V., Nuss, K.,
8. .. . Covert, J. (2015). A comparison of paper documentation to elec- tronic documentation for trauma resuscitations at a level I pediatric trauma center. Journal of Emergency Nursing, 41, 52–56.
9. Collins, S. A., Cato, K., Albers, D., Scott, K., Stetson, P. D., Bakken, S., & Vawdrey, D. K. (2013). Relationship between nursing documentation and patients’ mortality. American Journal of Critical Care, 22, 306– 313.
10. Darmer, M. R., Ankersen, L., Nielsen, B. G., Landberger, G., Lippert, E., & Egerod, I. (2006). Nursing documentation audit – The effect of a VIPS implementation programme in Denmark. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 15, 525–534.
11. Ehrenberg, A., Ehnfors, M., & Thorell-Ekstrand, I. (1996). Nursing docu- mentation in patient records: Experience of the use of the VIPS model. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 24, 853–867.
12. Evatt, M., Ren, D., Tuite, P., Reynolds, C., & Hravnak, M. (2014). Devel- opment and implementation of an educational support process for electronic nursing admission assessment documentation. Medsurg Nursing, 23, 89–95, 100.
13. Habibi-Koolaee, M., Safdari, R., & Bouraghi, H. (2015). Nurses readiness and electronic health records. Acta Informatica Medica, 23, 105–107.
14. Hediger, H., Muller-Staub, M., & Petry, H. (2016). Support of the nursing process through electronic nursing documentation systems (UEPD) – Initial validation of an instrument. Pflege, 29, 125–135.
15. Horwitz, L. I., Jenq, G. Y., Brewster, U. C., Chen, C., Kanade, S., Van Ness,
16. P. H., .. . Krumholz, H. M. (2013). Comprehensive quality of discharge summaries at an academic medical center. Journal of Hospital Medi- cine, 8, 436–443.
17. Kruse, C. S., Kristof, C., Jones, B., Mitchell, E., & Martinez, A. (2016). Bar- riers to electronic health record adoption: A systematic literature review. Journal of Medical Systems, 40, 252.
18. Kyle, R. G., & Atherton, I. M. (2016). Biogeography as critical nursing pedagogy: Breathing life into nurse education. Nurse Education in Practice, 20, 76–79.
19. Lubbe, J. C., & Roets, L. (2014). Nurses’ scope of practice and the impli- cation for quality nursing care. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 46, 58– 64.
20. Middleton, B., Bloomrosen, M., Dente, M. A., Hashmat, B., Koppel, R., Overhage, J. M., .. . Zhang, J. (2013). Enhancing patient safety and quality of care by improving the usability of electronic health record systems: Recommendations from AMIA. Journal of the American Medi- cal Informatics Association, 20, e2–e8.
21. Mu€ller-Staub, M., de Graaf-Waar, H., & Paans, W. (2016). An internation- ally consented standard for nursing process-clinical decision support systems in electronic health records. Computers Informatics, Nursing, 34, 493–502.
22. Nguyen, L., Bellucci, E., & Nguyen, L. T. (2014). Electronic health records implementation: An evaluation of information system impact and contingency factors. Int J Med Inform, 83, 779–796.
23. Nøst, T. H., Frigstad, S. A., & Andre´, B. (2017). Impact of an education intervention on nursing diagnoses in free-text format in electronic health records: A pretest–posttest study in a medical department at a university hospital. Nordic Journal of Nursing Research, 37, 100– 108.
24. Noureldin, M., Mosallam, R., & Hassan, S. (2014). Quality of documen- tation of electronic medical information systems at primary health care units in Alexandria, Egypt. East Mediterr Health J, 20, 105– 111.
25. Okaisu, E. M., Kalikwani, F., Wanyana, G., & Coetzee, M. (2014). Improv- ing the quality of nursing documentation: An action research project. Curationis, 37, 1–11.
Article Sidebar
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
All articles published in JPTCP are licensed under Copyright Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Aisha Lafi Eid Alsalhi
Nursing, Riyadh, South Naseem Health Center
Amnah Mohammed Alenazi
Nursing technician, Riyadh, South Naseem Health Center
Shaikhah Khulif Mayouf Alshammari
Nursing technician, Riyadh, South Naseem Health Center
Maha Khaled Awad Alanazi
Technician_Nursing, Alriyadh, Phc Alnassem South
Amsha Farhan Alenazi
Nursing technician, Riyadh, South Naseem Health Center
Jamlaa Obaid Alhamli
Nursing, Riyadh, South Naseem Health Center
Monira Mutleq Alnufiei
Nursing, Riyadh, Almnar Health Center
Fahdah Huwaydi Hamoud Alanazi
nursing, Riyadh, South Naseem Health Center