Comparative Analysis of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transvaginal Ultrasonography for Diagnosing, Mapping, and Measuring Uterine Myomas

Main Article Content

Khalid Matar Sayih Alanazi, Khaled Faza Alshamari, Qasem Zamil D Alanazi, Abdullah Khalaf Abdullah Alharbi, Sultan Soud M. Almutari, Falah Hasan A Almutairi

Keywords

Magnetic resonance imaging, transvaginal ultrasonography, uterine myomas

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to assess and compare the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and transvaginal ultrasonography (TVUS) in identifying, mapping, and measuring uterine myomas.
Study Design:A double-blind study was conducted on 106 premenopausal women who underwent hysterectomy for benign indications. A total of 257 myomas were precisely mapped using both MRI and TVUS. The accuracy of each method in identifying myomas with confirmed pathological positions was evaluated.


Results: Both MRI and TVUS demonstrated high sensitivity (MRI: 0.99, TVUS: 0.99) and specificity (MRI: 0.86, TVUS: 0.91) in detecting the presence of myomas. However, MRI outperformed TVUS in accurately identifying the number of myomas (mean difference: 0.51 ±
1.03; P < 0.001). This difference diminished in patients with fewer myomas and smaller uterine volumes (mean difference: 0.08 ± 0.76; P = 0.60). Both MRI and TVUS showed comparable accuracy in measuring myoma diameters in patients with 1 to 4 myomas.
Conclusion: While TVUS is effective in detecting the presence of myomas, MRI offers superior accuracy in mapping their exact locations, particularly in larger uteri with multiple myomas. Our findings underscore the importance of considering both imaging modalities based on the clinical context for optimal myoma diagnosis and management

Abstract 41 | PDF Downloads 11

References

1. Andolf, E., & Jorgensen, C. (1990). A prospective comparison of transabdominal and transvaginal ultrasound with surgical findings in gynecologic disease. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, 9(2), 71-75.
2. Coleman, B. G., Arger, P. H., Grumbach, K., Menard, M. K., Mintz, M. C., Allen, K. S., etal. (1988). Transvaginal and transabdominal sonography: prospective comparison.Radiology, 168(3), 639-643.
3. Leibman, A. J., Kruse, B., & McSweeney, M. B. (1988). Transvaginal sonography:comparison with transabdominal sonography in the diagnosis of pelvic masses. AJR.American Journal of Roentgenology, 151(1), 89-92.
4. Mendelson, E. B., Bohm, V. M., Joseph, N., & Neiman, H. L. (1988). Gynecologic imaging: comparison of transabdominal and transvaginal sonography. Radiology, 166(2),321-324.
5. Fukuda, M., Shimizu, T., Fukuda, K., Yomura, W., & Shimizu, S. (1993). Transvaginal hysterosonography for differential diagnosis between submucous and intramural myoma.Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation, 35(4), 236-239.