PREVALENCE OF STYLOID PROCESS ELONGATION AND THE TYPE OF ELONGATION AMONG PATIENTS USING DIGITAL ORTHOPANTOMOGRAPH.

Main Article Content

Ramya
Dr. Sindhu Poovannan
Dr. G.S. Asokan
Dr. Narmatha N
Dr. S. Angelinteena
Keerthiga.L

Keywords

.

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate the prevalence of styloid process elongation and the type of elongation among patients in a tertiary care dental hospital in Chengalpattu district using digital Orthopantomograph (OPG).


OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to measure the length of right and left styloid process; to assess for elongation; find the type of elongation based on Langlais classification; to understand the prevalence of unilateral /bilateral elongation of styloid process and also to evaluate any relationship between gender, age and styloid process elongation, using digital OPG.


MATERIALS AND METHODS: A Cross sectional Prevalence study was performed at Tagore Dental College and Hospital in the Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology. Patients of age above 18 years were included. The apparent length of the styloid process was measured with the help of the measurement tools on the accompanying software (Villa sistemi, Rotograph EVO D, India).


RESULTS: Elongation of styloid process was present among 25.2% of the study population. Bilateral elongation of styloid process is more than prevalent than unilateral elongation. Among unilateral elongation, right side showed more prevalence than left. Also, Langlais type I elongation is most prevalent followed by type II and III. No statistical significance was found in relation to Styloid process elongation, gender and age.


CONCLUSION: Patients who present with complaints related to tonsillar pain / dental pain / ear pain should be approached from the perspective of styloid process elongation. Misinterpretation of patient symptoms can be definitely eliminated with the usage of digital orthopantomography.

Abstract 63 | pdf Downloads 70

References

1. Chaurasia BD. Styloid apparatus: Deep structures in the neck. Human Anatomy, Regional and applied Dissection and Clinical. Head, neck and brain. 4th ed. Vol. 3. New Delhi: CBS Publisher; 2004. p. 200.
2. Worth HM. Principles and practice of oral radiologic interpretation. Chigaco: Year Book Medical Publishers; 1963. p. 327.
3. Eagle WW. Elongated styloid processes: Report of two cases. Arch Otolaryngol 1937;25:584-7.
4. Bozkir MG, Boga H, Dere F. The evaluation of styloid process in panoramic radiographs in edentulous patients. Tr J Med Sci 1999;29:481-5.
5. Kaufman SM, Elzay RP, Irish EF. Styloid process variation. Radiologic and clinical study. Arch Otolaryngol 1970;91:460-3.
6. Jaju PP, Suvarna P, Parikh N. Eagles syndrome. An enigma to dentists. J Indian Acad Oral Med Radiol 2007;19:424-9.
7. Steinman EP. Styloid syndrome in absence of an elongated process. Acta Otolaryngol 1968;66:347-56.
8. Camarda AJ, Deschamps C, Forest D. I. Stylohyoid chain ossification: A discussion of etiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1989;67:508-14.
9. Langlais RP, Miles DA, Van Dis ML. Elongated and mineralized stylohyoid ligament complex: A proposed classification and report of a case of Eagle’s Syndrome. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1986;61:527-32
10. Savranlar A, Uzun L, Uğur MB, Ozer T. Three-dimensional CT of Eagle’s syndrome. Diagn Interv Radiol 2005;11:206-9
11. Piagkou M, Anagnostopoulou S, Kouladouros K, Piagkos G. Eagle’s syndrome: A review of the literature. Clin Anat 2009;22:545-58
12. Eagle WW. Elongated styloid process; further observations and a new syndrome. Arch Otolaryngol 1948;47:630-40.
13. Gossman JR Jr, Tarsitano JJ. The styloid-stylohyoid syndrome. J Oral Surg 1977;35:555-60.
14. Correll RW, Jensen JL, Taylor JB, Rhyne RR. Mineralization of the Stylohyoid – Sylomandibular ligament complex. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1979;48:286-91.
15. Ferrario VF, Sigurta D, Daddona A, Dalloca L, Miani A, Tafuro F, et al. Calcification of the stylohyoid ligament: Incidence and morphoquantative evaluation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1990;69:524-9