Enhancing Detection of Hidden Injuries: Evaluating the Precision of Abdominal Ultrasound as a Supplementary Tool in Penetrating Trauma Evaluation

Main Article Content

Fatmah Mohammed Mousa, Ehtisham Mohammed Alahmari, Abdullah, Hassan Ahmed Qhal, Abdulaziz Abdullah Alhazzaa, Norah Abdullah Aldakhil, Hanan Ibrahim Alamoudi

Keywords

.

Abstract

Systematic Sonography Looking for Occult Wounds (SSLOW) represents a novel approach in trauma evaluation, specifically targeting the detection of intra-abdominal injuries in cases of penetrating trauma. Despite its potential significance, there remains a dearth of empirical evidence regarding its effectiveness. This study endeavors to evaluate the accuracy and efficacy of the SSLOW examination in this context.


Methods: Conducted over a span of 10 months, this prospective case series was carried out at the Accident and Emergency Department (A&E) . Enrolled participants comprised individuals aged 16 years and above who presented to the A&E department with penetrating abdominal trauma. Initial assessment involved the performance of an E-FAST examination for all patients. Subsequently, in cases where the E-FAST results were negative, a SSLOW examination was conducted. Specifically, the sonographer focused on identifying any evidence of free fluid accumulation amidst the loops of bowel. The outcomes of the SSLOW examination were then compared with the standard care procedures, including surgical consultation, serial abdominal and E-FAST examinations, laparotomy, and a 7-day follow-up period. The results were categorized into true positives, false positives, true negatives, and false negatives, facilitating the calculation of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and likelihood ratios.


Results: Among the participants, there were 5 (12%) true positives, 1 (2%) false positive, 37 (86%) true negatives, and zero (0%) false negatives. SSLOW exhibited a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI 5–100%) and a specificity of 97% (95% CI 74–96%). The positive predictive value was determined to be 80% (95% CI 1.0–64%), while the negative predictive value was found to be 100% (95% CI 88–100%). Furthermore, the positive likelihood ratio was calculated as 8.4 (95% CI 3.69–19.1), with a negative likelihood ratio of 0.


Conclusion: The findings of this study suggest that the SSLOW examination holds promise as a valuable adjunct in the comprehensive assessment of penetrating abdominal injuries.

Abstract 108 | pdf Downloads 18

References

1. Walcher F, Weinlich M, Conrad G, Schweiigkofer U, Breitkreutz R, Kirshning T, Marzi I. Prehospital ultrasound imaging improves management of abdominal trauma. Br J Surg. 2006;93(2):238–242.
2. Ma MAOJ. Trauma. In: Sydor SAM (ed) Ma & Mateer Emergency ultrasound. Mc Graw Hill Education, New York. 2014. pp 61–71.
3. Somcharit LS. Traumatic hemothorax and pneumothorax detected by EFAST compared with chest radiography at Siriraj Hospital. Siriraj Med J. 2016;68(3):171–176.
4. Rozycki GS, Ochsner MG, Jafn JH, Champion HR. Prospective evaluation of surgeons’ use of ultrasound in the evaluation of trauma patients. J Trauma. 1993;34(4):516–526 (discussion 526–7).
5. McKenney MG, Martin L, Lentz K, Lopez C, Sleeman D, Aristide G, Kirton O, Nunez D, Najjar R, Namias N, Sosa J. 1000 consecutive ultrasounds for blunt abdominal trauma. J Trauma. 1996;40(4):607–610 (discussion 611–2).
6. Akoglu H, Celik OF, Celik A, Ergelen R, Onur O, Denizbasi A. Diagnostic accuracy of the Extended Focused Abdominal Sonography for Trauma (E-FAST) performed by emergency physicians compared to CT. Am J Emerg Med. 2018;36(6):1014–1017.
7. Fakhry SM, Brownstein M, Watts DD, Baker CC, Oller D. Relatively short diagnostic delays (< 8 hours) produce morbidity and mortality in blunt small bowel injury: an analysis of time to operative intervention in 198 patients from a multicenter experience. J Trauma. 2000;48(3):408–414 (discussion 414–5).
8. Rupp J, Cooper W, Ferre R. Systematic Sonography for Detection of Occult Wounds in Trauma. J Ultrasound Med. 2018;37(6):1539–1542.
9. RajabzadehKanaf A, Giti M, Gharavi MH, Alizadeh A, Pourghorban R, Shekarchi B. Diagnostic accuracy of secondary ultrasound exam in blunt abdominal trauma. Iran J Radiol. 2014;11(3):e21010.
10. Georgetown Public Hospital Corporation. Georgetown Public Hospital Corporation Strategic Plan 2013–2017. Guyana. 2015. p. 1–15.
11. Wisquars. Web-based Injury Statistics Query and Reporting System (WISQARS) Fatal Injury Data. Centres for Disease Control and Prevention, National Centre for Injury Prevention and Control. 2016. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/injury/wisqars/index.html. Accessed January 2018.
12. World Health Organization. Global health estimates 2016: deaths by cause, age, sex, by country and by region, 2000–2016. World Health Organization, Geneva. 2018.
13. Stapakis JC, Thickman D. Diagnosis of pneumoperitoneum: abdominal CT vs upright chest film. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1992;16(5):713–716.
14. Baron BJ, Benabbas R, Kohler C, Biggs C, Roudnitsky V, Paladino L, Sinert R. Accuracy of computed tomography in diagnosis of intra-abdominal injuries in stable patients with anterior abdominal stab wounds: a systematic review and meta-analysis. AcadEmerg Med. 2018;25(7):744–757.
15. Rupp JD, Jagjit SD, Ferre RM. Emergency ultrasound training program in Guyana: systematic credentialing process in a resource-limited setting. AEM Educ Train. 2019;3(2):197–199.