ON THE VALIDITY OF TREATMENT OPTIONS IN EPISTAXIS: AN ANALYSIS OF 61 INTERVENTIONS

Main Article Content

Tanvir Hussain
Enas Alaqeab
Sarwar Attique
Alaa Almanassra

Keywords

epistaxis, rapid rhino insertion, treatment efficacy.

Abstract

Background: Epistaxis is a common otorhinolaryngological emergency often requiring hospital intervention. Rapid rhino (RR) tamponade is an emerging option, but efficacy data is limited. The study aimed at assessing success rates, failure patterns, and the need for additional procedures using an RR protocol for admitted patients with epistaxis.


Methods: A retrospective cohort study conducted at Limerick University Hospital ENT department analyzed 61 consecutive admitted adult epistaxis cases between 1/03/2023 to 31/10/2023. All underwent RR insertion (7.5 or 9.5cm devices depending on laterality) after decongestants and silver nitrate cautery failed.


Results: Total n=61; median age 52 years, 75% male. Equal unilateral versus bilateral incidence. Anterior epistaxis n=51 (84%) was controlled successfully with RR alone. Posterior bleeds (n=10,16%) failed RR requiring additional measures. Overall primary success rate was 98% with RR insertion alone. Supplementary interventions entailed posterior balloon inflation packing in 10 (16%) and sphenopalatine artery ligation in 2 (3%).


Conclusions: RR insertion was a highly efficacious first-line epistaxis treatment in this representative cohort, with 98% success rates overall for anterior bleeds. Failure patterns revealed increased refractoriness amongst posterior haemorrhage. By validating efficacy while quantifying interventions needed upon RR failure, the study endorses an RR-based institutional protocol while precisely guiding future resource allocation.

Abstract 144 | PDF Downloads 108

References

1. Alzahrani SA, Alanazi S, Alzahrani MM, Aldhalaan R, Alghamdi MA, Alghamdi L. Awareness of Epistaxis and Its First Aid Management among Teachers Working in Schools of Al-Baha Region, Saudi Arabia. Cureus. 2023 Sep 21;15(9):1–8.
2. Althaus AE, Lüske J, Arendt U, Dörks M, Freitag MH, Hoffmann F, et al. Treating Epistaxis – Who Cares for a Bleeding nose? a Secondary Data Analysis of Primary and Secondary Care. BMC Family Practice. 2021 Apr 15;22(75):1–8.
3. Smith J, Hanson J, Chowdhury R, Bungard TJ. Community-based Management of epistaxis: Who bloody knows? Canadian Pharmacists Journal: CPJ [Internet]. 2019 Apr 25;152(3):164–76. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6512189/
4. Tunkel DE, Anne S, Payne SC, Ishman SL, Rosenfeld RM, Abramson PJ, et al. Clinical Practice Guideline: Nosebleed (Epistaxis). Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery: Official Journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery [Internet]. 2020;162(1_suppl):S1–38. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31910111
5. Tran Q, Barnett J, O’Connell F, D’Anza B, Pourmand A. Nasal Packing in the Emergency Department: a Practical Review for Emergency Providers. Open Access Emergency Medicine. 2021 Dec;Volume 13:527–33.
6. Dür C, Anschuetz L, Negoiaș S, Bulut OC, Angelillo‐Scherrer A, Caversaccio M. Long-term Efficacy Assessment of Current Treatment Options for Epistaxis in HHT. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology. 2021 Mar 4;278(11):4321–8.
7. Pasha R, Golub JS. Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. 6th ed. Plural Publishing; 2021.
8. Kunz SM, Holzmann D, Waser Y, Meerwein C, Deggeller M, Soyka M. Does Length Matter? a Comparison of Rapid RhinoTM Nasal Packings for the Treatment of Epistaxis. American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy. 2019 Jul 23;33(6):723–9.
9. University of Iowa Health Care. Nose Bleed Management and Epistaxis Control | Iowa Head and Neck Protocols [Internet]. medicine.uiowa.edu. 2019. Available from:
https://medicine.uiowa.edu/iowaprotocols/nose-bleed-management-and-epistaxis-control
10. Toppi J, Chan SW, Pratap U, Kumar S, Phan R, Magarey M, et al. Cost Effectiveness of Posterior Epistaxis Management Using a gelatin-thrombin Matrix or Rapid Rhino. Australian Journal of Otolaryngology. 2020 Apr;3:1–8.
11. Piasecki J, Walkiewicz-Żarek E, Figas-Skrzypulec J, Kordecka A, Dranseika V. Ethical Issues in Biomedical Research Using Electronic Health records: a Systematic Review. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy. 2021 Jun 19;24:633–58.
12. Kravchik L, Pester JM. Anterior Epistaxis Nasal Pack [Internet]. StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023. Available from:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK538304/
13. Parajuli R. Evaluation of Etiology and Treatment Methods for Epistaxis: a Review at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Central Nepal. International Journal of Otolaryngology.
2015;2015(283854):1–5.
14. Lehane E, Leahy-Warren P, O’Riordan C, Savage E, Drennan J, O’Tuathaigh C, et al. Evidence-based Practice Education for Healthcare professions: an Expert View. BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine [Internet]. 2019 May 22;24(3):103–8. Available from:
https://ebm.bmj.com/content/24/3/103
15. Abbas Y, Abdelkader M, Adams M, Addison A, Advani R, Ahmed T, et al. Nasal Packs for Epistaxis: Predictors of Success. Clinical Otolaryngology. 2020 Jun 5;45(5):659–66.
16. McClurg SW, Carrau RL. Endoscopic Management of Posterior epistaxis: a review. PubMed. 2014 Feb 1;34(1):1–8.
17. Yarkoni T. The Generalizability Crisis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 2020 Dec 21;45:1–37.
18. Seifirad S, Alquran L. The Bigger, the Better? When Multicenter Clinical Trials and meta-analyses Do Not Work. Current Medical Research and Opinion. 2021 Jan 11;37(2):321–6.
19. Turner HC, Archer RA, Downey LE, Isaranuwatchai W, Chalkidou K, Jit M, et al. An Introduction to the Main Types of Economic Evaluations Used for Informing Priority Setting and Resource Allocation in Healthcare: Key Features, Uses, and Limitations. Frontiers in Public Health. 2021 Aug 25;9.
20. Tabassom A, Cho JJ. Epistaxis (Nose Bleed) [Internet]. StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2020. Available from:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK435997/