CLINICAL EVALUATION OF BULK FILL FLOWABLE COMPOSITE AND NANOFILLED COMPOSITE IN NON CARIOUS CERVICAL LESIONS
Main Article Content
Keywords
.
Abstract
Objective :The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical performance of Bulk fill flowable composite and Filtek Z350XT universal restorative in Non Carious Cervical Lesions over 6 months.
Methods : 19 subject with atleast one NCCL were enrolled in this study .A total of 92 restorations were performed by a single operator using Filtek Bulk fill flowable composite (3M) and Filtek Z350XT(3M) universal restorative .The clinical evaluation of these restorations were done using modified United States Public Health Services( USPHS) criteria by two independent ,blinded and previously calibrated eaminers at baseline (7 days) and at 6 months. A universal adhesive (Scotchbond™ Universal Adhesive) was used with a self-etching approach in dentin. Cohen’s Kappa statistics was applied to test for the inter-examiner agreement and Chi-square test for comparisons between the baseline and follow-up. The level of significance was set at 0.05.
Results : Two restoration was considered clinically unacceptable due to loss of retention after 6 months in the Filtek Z350 XT group .Z350 xt presented statistically high scores for surface roughness when compared to Filtek bulkfill flowable after 6 months (p < 0.05) but both were considered clinically acceptable and several significant differences were detected among the follow-up periods for the other criteria and all were clinically acceptable .
Conclusions : At baseline and at 6 months follow ups both bulk-fill flowable and
nanofilled composites resulted in acceptable clinical performance.
References
2. Stojanac IL, Premovic MT, Ramic BD, Drobac MR, Stojsin IM, Petrovic LM. Noncarious cervical lesions restored with three different tooth-colored materials: two-year results. Operativedentistry.2013;38(1):12-20..
3. Tuncer D, Çelik Ç, Yamanel K, Arhun N. Clinical evaluation of microhybrid composites in noncarious cervical lesions: 24-month results. Nigerian journal of clinical practice. 2017;20(2):176-81.
4. Peumans M, Kanumilli P, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives: a systematic review of current clinical trials. Dental materials. 2005 Sep 1;21(9):864-81.
5. Rees JS, Jagger DC. Abfraction lesions: Myth or reality? J Esthet Restor Dent 2003;15:263-271.
6. Miller WD. Experiments and observations the wasting of tooth tissue variously. Designated as erosion, abrasion, chemical abrasion, denudation, etc. Dent Cosmos1907;49:225-247.
7. Pecie R, Krejci I, Garcia-Godoy F, Bortolotto T. Noncarious cervical lesions—A clinical concept based on the literature review. Part 1: Prevention. American Journal of Dentistry. 2011 Feb 1;24(1):49.
8. Canali GD, Ignácio SA, Rached RN, Souza EM. One-year clinical evaluation of bulk-fill flowable vs. regular nanofilled composite in non-carious cervical lesions. Clinical oral investigations. 2019 Feb 8;23(2):889-97.
9. Dos Reis Perez C, Gonzalez MR, Prado NA, de Miranda MS, de Andrade Macêdo M, Fernandes BM. Restoration of Noncarious Cervical Lesions: When, Why, and How. International Journal of dentistry. 2012;2012.
10. Nassar AM, Abdalla AI, Shalaby ME. One year clinical follow up of nano filled glass ionomer and composite resin restorations. Tanta Dental Journal. 2014 Apr 1;11(1):21-35.
11. Szesz A, Parreiras S, Martini E, Reis A, Loguercio A, Szesz A, Parreiras S, Martini E, Reis A, Loguercio A. Effect of restorations using a flowable resin composite in non-carious cervical lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.[Review] Source Journal of Dentistry., 2017 Jul 17.
12. Kubo S, Yokota H, Yokota H, Hayashi Y. Three-year clinical evaluation of a flowable and a hybrid resin composite in noncarious cervical lesions. Journal of dentistry. 2010 Mar 1;38(3):191-200
13. Van Landuyt KL, Peumans M, Fieuws S, De Munck J, Cardoso MV, Ermis RB, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. A randomized controlled clinical trial of a HEMA-free all-in-one adhesive in noncarious cervical lesions at 1 year. Journal of Dentistry. 2008 Oct 1;36(10):847-55.
14. Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. Clinical investigation of G‐Bond resin‐based adhesive to non‐carious cervical lesions over five years. Australian dental journal. 2012 Dec;57(4):458-63.
15. Pecie RA, Krejci I, García-Godoy FR, Bortolotto TI. Noncarious cervical lesions (NCCL)—A clinical concept based on theliterature review. Part 2: Restoration. American Journal of Dentistry. 2011 Jun 1;24(3):183.
16. Peumans M, De Munck J, Van Landuyt KL, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Eight-year clinical evaluation of a 2-step self-etch adhesive with and without selective enamel etching.DentalMaterials.2010;26(12):1176-84.
17. Loguercio AD, De Paula EA, Hass V, Luque-Martinez I, Reis A, Perdigão J. A new universal simplified adhesive: 36-month randomized double-blind clinical trial. Journal of Dentistry. 2015;43(9):1083-92.
18. Hanabusa M, Mine A, Kuboki T, Momoi Y, Van Ende A, Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J. Bonding effectiveness of a new ‘multimode’adhesive to enamel and dentine. Journal of dentistry. 2012:1;40(6):475-84.
19. Suzuki T, Takamizawa T, Barkmeier WW, Tsujimoto A, Endo H, Erickson RL, Latta MA, Miyazaki M. Influence of etching mode on enamel bond durability of universal adhesive systems. Operative dentistry. 2016 Sep;41(5):520-30.
20. Roberson TM ,Heymann HO, Ritter AV. Introduction to composite restorations .In: Roberson TM,Heymann HO ,Swift EJ (eds). Sturdevant’s Art and Science of Operative Dentistry .St Louis .Mosby,2002:470-550.
21. Baratieri LN, Canabarro S, Lopes GC, Ritter AV. Effect of resin viscosity and enamel beveling on the clinical performance of Class V composite restorations: three-year results. OPERATIVE DENTISTRY-UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON-. 2003 Sep 1;28(5):482-7.
22. Yu H, Wegehaupt FJ, Wiegand A, Roos M, Attin T, Buchalla W. Erosion and abrasion of tooth-colored restorative materials and human enamel. Journal of Dentistry. 2009 :1;37(12):913-22.
23. Porto IC. Post-operative sensitivity in direct resin composite restorations: clinical practice guidelines. IJRD. 2012;1:1-2..
24. Pecie RA, Krejci I, García-Godoy FR, Bortolotto TI. Noncarious cervical lesions (NCCL)—A clinical concept based on the literature review. Part 2: Restoration. American Journal of Dentistry. 2011 Jun 1;24(3):183
Article Sidebar
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
All articles published in JPTCP are licensed under Copyright Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Dr Pranalika kanojiya
Department of Conservative dentistry & Endodontics Hitkarini Dental College Jabalpur
Dr Kavita Dube
Professor, Department of Conservative dentistry & Endodontics Hitkarini Dental College Jabalpur
Dr Shivkumar Mantri
Department of Conservative dentistry & Endodontics Hitkarini Dental College Jabalpur
Dr Bonny Paul
Department of Conservative dentistry & Endodontics Hitkarini Dental College Jabalpur
Dr Nupur Bhatnagar
Department of Conservative dentistry & Endodontics Hitkarini Dental College Jabalpur
Dr Charu Kapur Chhabra
Department of Conservative dentistry & Endodontics Hitkarini Dental College Jabalpur
Dr Pallavi Sinha
Department of Conservative dentistry & Endodontics Hitkarini Dental College Jabalpur