CHANGING TRENDS IN RATE OF CERVICAL DILATION IN FIRST STAGE OF LABOUR: PROSPECTIVE LONGITUDINAL STUDY

Main Article Content

Dr. Satyajit Jena
Dr. Shwetha N.
Dr. Soubhagya Kumar Das
Dr. Tajma Afzal
Kasturi Raman Singh
Dr. Tushar Kar

Keywords

Cervical Dilation, Labour

Abstract

Background: This study was conducted to evaluate the changing trend in the rate of cervical dilatation in the first stage of labour.


Methods: This was a hospital-based prospective longitudinal observational study conducted among 300 female patients attending labour room of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of SCB Medical College and Hospital, Cuttack, from 1st April 2021 to 31st March 2022 after obtaining clearance from the institutional ethics committee and written informed consent from the study participants.


Results: The mean average rate of cervical dilatation between 4-6 cm was 1.79±1.42 cm/hr and between 6-10 cm was 3.24±1.68 cm/hr. Upon conducting an independent t-test, the mean average rate of cervical dilatation was significantly higher between 6 and 10 cm than between 4 and 6 cm. The average dilatation in the case of spontaneous type of labour between 4-6 cm was 1.79±1.12 cm/hr and between 6-10 cm was 3.39±1.89 cm/hr. Upon conducting an independent t-test, there was no significant difference in the average rate of cervix dilatation in the case of spontaneous labour between 4-6 cm and 6–10 cm. In the case of induced type of labour, between 4-6 cm 1.63±1.59 cm/hr and between 6-10 cm it was found to be 2.63±1.09 cm/hr. Upon conducting an independent t-test, the average cervix dilatation in cases of induced labour was significantly higher between 6 and 10 cm of dilatation than between 4 and 6 cm of dilatation. There was a significant association between the average rate of cervical dilatation between 4-6 cm/hr among the two groups of patients, which were primigravida and multigravida. There was no significant association between the average rate of cervical dilatation between 6 and 10 cm/hr among the two groups of patients, which were primigravida and multigravida.


Conclusion: There is a substantial difference in the rates of cervical dilation during induced labour and spontaneous labour after 6 cm of cervical dilatation, indicating that the active stage of labour lasts longer with the induced method. Patients whose cervical dilatation rate is 0.6 cm or less per hour are safe candidates for vaginal delivery.

Abstract 54 | pdf Downloads 49

References

1. Friedman E. The graphic analysis of labour. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1954;68(6):1568-75.
2. Friedman EA, Sachtleben MR. Dysfunctional labour. I. Prolonged latent phase in the nullipara. Obstet Gynecol 1961; 17:135-48.
3. Friedman EA, Sachtleben MR. Dysfunctional labour. II. Protracted active- phase dilatation in the nullipara. Obstet Gynecol 1961; 17:566-78.
4. Friedman EA. Primigravid labour; a graphicostatistical analysis. Obstet Gynecol 1955;6(6):567-89.
5. Friedman EA. Labour in multiparas; a graphic statistical analysis. Obstet Gynecol 1956;8(6):691-703.
6. Zhang J, Troendle J, Mikolajczyk R, Sundaram R, Beaver J, Fraser W. The natural history of the normal first stage of labour. Obstet Gynecol 2010;115(4):705-10.
7. Zhang J, Troendle JF, Yancey MK. Reassessing the labour curve in nulliparous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;187(4):824-8.
8. Betran AP, Ye J, Moller AB, Zhang J, Gulmezoglu AM, Torloni MR. The increasing trend in caesarean section rates: global, regional and national estimates: 1990-2014. PLoS One 2016;11(2):e0148343.
9. World Health Organization. WHO recommendations for augmentation of labour. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization 2014.
10. Committee on Obstetric Practice. Committee opinion no. 687: approaches to limit intervention during labour and birth. Obstet Gynecol 2017;129(2):e20–8.
11. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Caughey AB, Cahill AG, Guise JM, Rouse DJ. Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014;210(3):179-93.
12. Laughon SK, Branch DW, Beaver J, Zhang J. Changes in labour patterns over 50 years. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012;206(5):419e1-9.
13. Neal JL, Lowe NK, Patrick TE, Cabbage LA, Corwin EJ. What is the slowest-yet-normal cervical dilation rate among nulliparous women with spontaneous labour onset? J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2010;39(4):361-9.
14. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Intrapartum care for healthy women and babies. 2014 [www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg190]. Accessed 25 Nov. 2022.
15. Cunningham FG, Levono KJ, Bloom SL, Spong CY, Dashe JS, Hoffman BL, et al. editors. Williams’s obstetrics. 24th edn. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education 2014.
16. Cronjé HS, Cilliers JBF, Pretorius MS. Clinical obstetrics: a South African perspective, 3rd edn. Pretoria: Van Schaik Publishers 2011.
17. India - median age at first pregnancy by age groups 2016 [Internet]. Statista. [Cited 2023 Jan 20]. Available from: https://www.statista. com/statistics/680256/median-age-at-first-pregnancy-by-age-groups- India/
18. Shukla DV, Shukla SD, Patel S, Shah A. Changing Trends in Rate of Cervical Dilation in First Stage of Labour: Prospective Longitudinal Study. Open J Obstet Gynecol 2020;10(9):1176-86.
19. Pati S, Puri P, Sinha R, Panda M, Pati S. Profile of comorbidity and multimorbidity among women attending antenatal clinics: An exploratory cross-sectional study from Odisha, India. J Fam Med Prim Care 2022;11(5):1980-8.
20. Friedman EA. Primigravid Labour: a graphicostatistical analysis. Obstet Gynecol 1955;6(6):567.
21. Neal JL, Lowe NK, Patrick TE, Cabbage LA, Corwin EJ. What is the Slowest-Yet-normal cervical dilation rate among nulliparous women with spontaneous labour onset? J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2010;39(4):361-9.
22. Oladapo O, Diaz V, Bonet M, Abalos E, Thwin S, Souza H, et al. Cervical dilatation patterns of ‘low-risk’ women with spontaneous labour and normal perinatal outcomes: a systematic review. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol 2018;125(8):944–54.
23. Inde Y, Nakai A, Sekiguchi A, Hayashi M, Takeshita T. Cervical Dilatation Curves of Spontaneous Deliveries in Pregnant Japanese Females. Int J Med Sci 2018;15(6):549-56.
24. Gimovsky AC, Berghella V. Randomized controlled trial of prolonged second stage: extending the time limit vs usual guidelines. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016;214(3):361.e1-6.
25. Hamilton EF, Warrick PA, Collins K, Smith S, Garite TJ. Assessing first- stage labour progression and its relationship to complications. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016;214(3):358e1-8.
26. Østborg TB, Romundstad PR, Eggebø TM. Duration of the active phase of labour in spontaneous and induced labours. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2017;96(1):120-7.
27. Abalos E, Oladapo OT, Chamillard M, Díaz V, Pasquale J, Bonet M, et al. Duration of spontaneous labour in ‘low- risk’ women with ‘normal’ perinatal outcomes: a systematic review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2018; 223:123-32.

Most read articles by the same author(s)