Main Article Content

Dr Sadia Nisar Ahmed
Dr Saba Samad
Dr Sakina Qazi
Dr Hira
Dr Muhammad Qasim
Dr Fatima Zafar
Dr Maqbool shah



Background: This study explores the intricate relationship between gingival parameters of mandibular incisors and craniofacial morphology. The research seeks to shed light on how craniofacial characteristics influence smile aesthetics and the positioning of mandibular incisors, providing valuable insights for orthodontic and periodontal treatment planning.

Methods: A total of 130 participants were meticulously selected from Bacha Khan College of Dentistry, spanning an age range of 18 to 40 years. Gingival parameters, including gingival display (mean ± SD: 3.5 ± 1.2 mm) and incisal edge position (mean ± SD: 4.7 ± 1.1 mm), were assessed using a periodontal probe, while craniofacial morphology was evaluated using cephalometric measurements. Statistical analysis, including correlation tests, was employed to examine the relationships between these parameters.

Results: The study revealed a significant negative correlation (p < 0.05) between gingival display and mandibular position (SNB), indicating that individuals with a more prominent mandibular position tend to display less gum tissue during smiling. Moreover, a strong positive correlation (p < 0.001) was found between incisal edge position and both maxillary position (SNA) and mandibular position (SNB), suggesting that craniofacial morphology significantly influences the positioning of mandibular incisors.

Conclusion: This research offers valuable insights into the relationships between gingival parameters of mandibular incisors and craniofacial morphology, with specific measurements highlighting the impact of craniofacial characteristics on smile aesthetics. These findings have important implications for orthodontic and periodontal treatment planning, contributing to the art of smile design in aesthetic dentistry.

Abstract 139 | pdf Downloads 45


1. Mazurova K, Kopp JB, Renkema AM, Pandis N, Katsaros C, Fudalej PS. Gingival recession in mandibular incisors and symphysis morphology—a retrospective cohort study. European journal of orthodontics. 2018 Apr 6;40(2):185-92.
2. Valletta R, Pango A, Tortora G, Rongo R, Simeon V, Spagnuolo G, D’Antò V. Association between gingival biotype and facial typology through cephalometric evaluation and three-dimensional facial scanning. Applied Sciences. 2019 Nov 23;9(23):5057.
3. Mazurova K, Renkema AM, Navratilova Z, Katsaros C, Fudalej PS. No association between gingival labial recession and facial type. European journal of orthodontics. 2016 Jun 1;38(3):286-91.
4. Pi S, Choi YJ, Hwang S, Lee DW, Yook JI, Kim KH, Chung CJ. Local injection of hyaluronic acid filler improves open gingival embrasure: validation through a rat model. Journal of periodontology. 2017 Nov;88(11):1221-30.
5. Salti L, Holtfreter B, Pink C, Habes M, Biffar R, Kiliaridis S, Krey KF, Bülow R, Völzke H, Kocher T, Daboul A. Estimating effects of craniofacial morphology on gingival recession and clinical attachment loss. Journal of clinical periodontology. 2017 Apr;44(4):363-71.
6. Kumari N, Fida M, Shaikh A. Exploration of variations in positions of upper and lower incisors, overjet, overbite, and irregularity index in orthodontic patients with dissimilar depths of curve of spee. Journal of Ayub Medical College Abbottabad. 2016 Dec 1;28(4):766-72.
7. Bernhardt O, Krey KF, Daboul A, Voelzke H, Kindler S, Kocher T, Schwahn C. New insights in the link between malocclusion and periodontal disease. Journal of clinical periodontology. 2019 Feb;46(2):144-59.
8. Kong J, Hartsfield Jr JK, Aps J, Naoum S, Lee R, Miranda LA, Goonewardene MS. Effect of craniofacial morphology on gingival parameters of mandibular incisors. The Angle Orthodontist. 2023 May 5.
9. Kaya Y, Alkan Ö, Alkan EA, Keskin S. Gingival thicknesses of maxillary and mandibular anterior regions in subjects with different craniofacial morphologies. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2018 Sep 1;154(3):356-64.
10. Cha S, Lee SM, Zhang C, Tan Z, Zhao Q. Correlation between gingival phenotype in the aesthetic zone and craniofacial profile—a CBCT-based study. Clinical Oral Investigations. 2021 Mar;25:1363-74.
11. Kalina E, Zadurska M, Sobieska E, Górski B. Relationship between periodontal status of mandibular incisors and selected cephalometric parameters: preliminary results. Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics. 2019;80(3):107.
12. Menezes EB, Bittencourt MA, Machado AW. Do different vertical positions of maxillary central incisors influence smile esthetics perception?. Dental press journal of orthodontics. 2017 Mar;22:95-105.
13. Amid R, Ebrahimi N, Kadkhodazadeh M, Mirakhori M, Mehrinejad P, Nematzadeh F, Dehnavi F. Clinical evaluation of a new device to measure maximum bite force. Dentist. Case. Rep. 2018;2:26-9.
14. Khan M, Kazmi SM, Khan FR, Samejo I. Analysis of different characteristics of smile. BDJ open. 2020 May 5;6(1):6.
15. Kolte RA, Kolte AP, Kharkar VV, Bawankar P. Influence of facial index, facial profile, lip size, and angulations of teeth on gingival characteristics of anterior teeth: A gender‐based evaluation. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry. 2020 Jul;32(5):496-504.
16. Sangalli L, Savoldi F, Dalessandri D, Visconti L. Historical Development of the Planning of Incisal Position in Orthodontic Treatments: A Narrative Review of the Literature. Curr. Trends Dent. 2021;1(01).
17. Sangalli L, Dalessandri D, Bonetti S, Mandelli G, Visconti L, Savoldi F. Proposed parameters of optimal central incisor positioning in orthodontic treatment planning: a systematic review. Korean Journal of Orthodontics. 2022 Jan 25;52(1):53-65.

Most read articles by the same author(s)