THE EFFICACY OF CUSTOM-DESIGNED, LIGHT-WEIGHT HOLLOW OCULAR PROSTHESIS: NON-COMPARATIVE INTERVENTIONAL PROSPECTIVE STUDY IN MAYO HOSPITAL, LAHORE, PAKISTAN

Main Article Content

Hafiza Sadia Imtiaz
Zahid Kamal Siddique
Fizzah Zahid
Zahid Hafeez Sheikh

Keywords

Custom-designed, Light-weight, Ocular prosthesis, Anophthalmic Socket

Abstract

The study was conducted to determine the efficacy of custom-designed, light-weight ocular prosthesis in cosmetic rehabilitation of anophthalmic socket with regard to patient’s satisfaction level, degree of motility, and less associated complications. The Non-comparative interventional prospective study was employed at the Eye unit III, Mayo Hospital, Lahore. After taking IRB approval, 100 patients of either age and gender, with anophthalmic socket following evisceration or enucleation where orbital volume was sufficiently restored and the fornices were adequately formed, enrolled in this study. Custom-designed and light-weight ocular prosthesis were fabricated by the ocularist and follow up were done. Patient’s satisfaction score, degree of motility of ocular prosthesis and associated complications were recorded on proforma. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS v 25. The findings show that out of 100 patients, 36% were male and 64% were female. Majority of patients (63%) had evisceration previously and the highest percentage for its cause was endophthalmitis (33%). Mean patient’s satisfaction score at one month was 4.96±1.25 that further improved to 5.21±0.68 at 6 months follow up with a significant p-value of 0.032 (< 0.05). Degree of prosthetic eye movement was fair in majority (43%) and the most common complication was mucous discharge that too only in 17%. The findings can be concluded that custom designed and light-weight ocular prosthesis are very effective in achieving the higher satisfactory score of patients, better ocular motility and reducing the prosthesis related complications that help patients in maintaining the better quality of life.

Abstract 100 | Pdf Downloads 59

References

1- Lbbbkin V, Sloan. S:Enucleation and psychic trauma. Advances in Plastic and Recontructive surgery 1990; 8; 259-262.
2- Schmitzer S, Simionescu C, Alexandrescu C, Burcea M. The Anophthalmic Socket - Reconstruction Options. J Med Life. 2014;7 Spec No. 4(Spec Iss 4):23-9. PMID: 27478515; PMCID: PMC4962761.
3- London Times (February 20, 2007). “5000 years old artificial eye found on Iran-Afghan border.”
4- 3rd millennium B C artificial eye ball discovered in Burnt city Dec. 10, 2008.
5- Frequently asked questions, American Society of Ocularist
6- Gunaseelaraj R, Karthikeyan S, Kumar MN, Balamurugan T, Jagadeeshwaran AR. Custom-made ocular prosthesis. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2012 Aug;4(Suppl 2):S177-9. doi: 10.4103/0975-7406.100264. PMID: 23066246; PMCID: PMC3467907.
7- De Gottrau P, Holbach LM, Naumann GO. Clinicopathological review of 1146 enucleations (1980-90). Br J Ophthalmol 1994;78:260-5. [Crossref] [PubMed]
8- Koch KR, Trester W, Muller-Uri N, et al. Ocular prosthetics. Fitting, daily use and complications. Ophthalmologe 2016;113:133-42. [Crossref] [PubMed]
9- Rokohl AC, Koch KR, Adler W, et al. Concerns of anophthalmic patients-a comparison between cryolite glass and polymethyl methacrylate prosthetic eye wearers. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2018;256:1203-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
10- Rokohl AC, Koch KR, Trester M, et al. Concerns of Anophthalmic Patients Wearing Cryolite Glass Prosthetic Eyes. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg 2018;34:369-74. [PubMed]
11- Rokohl AC, Mor JM, Trester M, et al. Rehabilitation of Anophthalmic Patients with Prosthetic Eyes in Germany Today - Supply Possibilities, Daily Use, Complications and Psychological Aspects. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2019;236:54-62. [PubMed]
12- Bohman E, Roed Rassmusen ML, Kopp ED. Pain and discomfort in the anophthalmic socket. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2014;25:455-60. [Crossref] [PubMed]
13- Pine NS, de Terte I, Pine KR. An investigation into discharge, visual perception, and appearance concerns of prosthetic eye wearers. Orbit 2017;36:401-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
14- Pine NS, De Terte I, Pine KR. Time Heals: An Investigation into How Anophthalmic Patients Feel about Eye Loss and Wearing a Prosthetic Eye. J Ophthalmol and Vis Sci 2017;2:1018.
15- Pine NS, De Terte I, Pine KR. The Impact of Eye Loss and Prosthetic Eye Wear on Recreational, Occupational and Social Areas of Functioning. J Ophthalmol and Vis Sci 2017;2:1016.
16- Chin K, Margolin CB, Finger PT. Early ocular prosthesis insertion improves quality of life after enucleation. Optometry 2006;77:71-5. [Crossref] [PubMed]
17- Pine K, Sloan B, Stewart J, et al. Concerns of anophthalmic patients wearing artificial eyes. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2011;39:47-52. [PubMed]
18- Hughes MO, Hughes N. Visual Field Deficits After Eye Loss: What Do Monocular Patients (Not) See? Insight 2015;40:11-7. [PubMed]
19- Udayshankar V, Mahesh Gowda E, Kumar R V, Jain V. Rehabilitation of ocular defect with hollow ocular prosthesis. IP International Journal of Ocular Oncology and Oculoplasty. 2019;5(4):267–70. doi:10.18231/j.ijooo.2019.06
20- Azhar IS, Megantara RW, Dahlan A. Custom-made ocular prosthesis for rehabilitation of missing parts of the face: A case report. Acta Medica Philippina. 2021;55(8). doi:10.47895/amp.v55i8.2119
21- Rokohl A, Trester M, Mor J, Loreck N, Koch K, Heindl L. Customizing a cryolite Glass Prosthetic Eye. Journal of Visualized Experiments. 2019;(152). doi:10.3791/60016
22- Ariani MD, Dahlan A, Waluyo WH, Subeqi MD. Custom made ocular prosthesis in elderly patients: A case report. Journal of Applied Pharmaceutical Science. 2022; doi:10.7324/japs.2023.55831