Main Article Content

Tanu Gupta
Anurag Hasti
Sachin Kumar
Vinay Yadav




Purpose: To investigate gypsum compatibility and dimensional stability of irreversible hydrocolloid impression materials with three mixing techniques. A comparison between vacuum-mixed, mechanically-mixed and manually-mixed techniques was evaluated for each impression material.

Materials and Methods: Three irreversible hydrocolloid impression materials Kromopan 100® (Lascod™), Identic® (Dux dental™), and Jeltrate Plus® (Dentsply™) were tested gypsum compatibility in accordance with ANSI/ADA Specification No. 18 for alginate impression materials. The test for linear dimensional stability was tested in accordance with ANSI/ADA Specification No. 19 for elastomeric impression materials. A One-way ANOVA test was used to analyze dimensional stability at a significance level of (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: The vacuum mixing technique facilitates the mixing of irreversible hydrocolloid impression materials and improves the compatibility with gypsum material and reproduces a more dimensionally accurate cast than the other mixing techniques.

Abstract 99 | pdf Downloads 61


1. Wilson, HJ. Some properties of alginate impression materials relevant to clinical practice. British Dental Journal. 1966;15:463-7
2. Skinner EW, Cooper EN, Beck FE. Reversible and irreversible hydrocolloid impression materials. Journal of the American Dental Association. 1950;40:196-207
3. Reisbick MH, Garrett R., Smith DD. Some effects of device versus handmixing of irreversible hydrocolloids. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1982;47:92-94
4. Frey GF, Lu H, Powers J. Effect of mixing methods on mechanical properties of alginate impression materials. Journal of Prosthodontics. 2005;14(4):221-225
5. Inoue K, Song YX, Kamiunten O, Oku J, Terao T, Fujii K. Effect of mixing method on rheological properties of alginate impression materials. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 2002;29:615-9
6. Owen CP. An investigation into the compatibility of some irreversible hydrocolloid impression materials and dental gypsum products. Part II. A refined discriminatory procedure. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 1986;13:147-162.
7. Inoue K, Song YX, Fujii K, Kadokawa A, Kanie T. Consistency of alginate impression materials and their evaluation. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 1999; 26:203-7.
8. Hamilton MJ, Vandewalle KS, Roberts HW, Hamilton GJ. Microtomographic porosity determination in alginate mixed with various methods. Journal of Prosthodontics. 2010;19;478-81.
9. Patel RD, Kattadiyil MT. Goodacre CJ, Winer MS. An in vitro investigation into the physical properties of irreversible hydrocolloid alternatives. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2010;104(5):325-32
10. American National Standards Institute/American Dental Association Council of Scientific Affairs, Chicago, Illinois. American Dental Association Specification No. Dental Elastomeric Impression Materials. 2004.