ASSESSING SAUDI ARABIAN INDIVIDUALS' ATTITUDES AND PERCEPTIONS ON THE CONFIDENTIALITY AND PRIVACY OF ELECTRONIC HEALTH AND MEDICAL INFORMATION
Main Article Content
Keywords
Confidentiality, Attitudes, Privacy, Electronic Health, Medical Information
Abstract
Introduction: Health information privacy and confidentiality are essential for protecting personal health data in the digital age. Understanding individuals' perceptions of privacy is crucial for developing effective policies and technologies.
Aim and Objective: This study aimed to assess Saudi Arabian Individuals' Attitudes and Perceptions on the Confidentiality and Privacy of Electronic Health and Medical Information
Materials and methods: A descriptive cross-sectional design was employed, surveying 1034 Saudi Arabians aged 18 and above in 2023. The questionnaire consisted of 26 questions covering demographic information, awareness, and policies related to privacy and confidentiality.
Results: The survey revealed that approximately 43.5% of participants reported average computer skills. 4.1% experienced severe breaches of personal health information without consent. Additionally, 9.6% chose to forgo medical testing due to concerns about result confidentiality. 8.9% expressed discomfort with healthcare professionals using computers, and 13.6% had concerns about invading personal information. Regarding awareness of their right to access and modify medical records, 29.1% were aware, 25.7% were unaware, and 45.3% were uncertain.
Conclusions: This research presents insight into Saudi nationals' views and understanding of health data privacy in the digital era. Analysis of responses from 1034 participants revealed nuanced attitudes regarding confidentiality and security of health information on online platforms. Our results could have lasting ramifications for shaping health policy within Saudi Arabia, particularly by emphasizing the need for robust strategies that protect personal health data, instilling greater trust and safety into digital healthcare systems used by users. Future research should address these findings by exploring larger samples, conducting longitudinal studies, and employing qualitative methods.
References
2. Gostin LO, Hodge Jr JG. Personal privacy and common goods: a framework for balancing under the national health information privacy rule. Minn L Rev. 2001;86:1439.
3. Andriole KP. Security of electronic medical information and patient privacy: what you need to know. Journal of the American College of Radiology. 2014;11(12):1212-1216.
4. Aspden P, Corrigan JM, Wolcott J, Erickson SM. Patient safety reporting systems and applications. In: Patient Safety: Achieving a New Standard for Care. National Academies Press (US); 2004.
5. Denaxas SC, Morley KI. Big biomedical data and cardiovascular disease research: opportunities and challenges. European Heart Journal-Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes. 2015;1(1):9-16.
6. Van Velthoven MH, Mastellos N, Majeed A, O’Donoghue J, Car J. Feasibility of extracting data from electronic medical records for research: an international comparative study. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making. 2016;16(1):1-10.
7. Bhargava HK, Mishra AN. Electronic medical records and physician productivity: Evidence from panel data analysis. Management Science. 2014;60(10):2543-2562.
8. Kruse CS, Stein A, Thomas H, Kaur H. The use of electronic health records to support population health: a systematic review of the literature. Journal of medical systems. 2018;42:1-16.
9. Kupersmith J, Francis J, Kerr E, et al. Advancing Evidence-Based Care For Diabetes: Lessons From The Veterans Health Administration: A highly regarded EHR system is but one contributor to the quality transformation of the VHA since the mid-1990s. Health affairs. 2007;26(Suppl1):w156-w168.
10. Terry NP, Francis LP. Ensuring the privacy and confidentiality of electronic health records. U Ill L Rev. Published online 2007:681.
11. Kahn S, Sheshadri V. Medical record privacy and security in a digital environment. IT professional. 2008;10(2):46-52.
12. Duckert M, Barkhuus L. Protecting Personal Health Data through Privacy Awareness: A study of perceived data privacy among people with chronic or long-term illness. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction. 2022;6(GROUP):1-22.
13. Özkan Ö. Attitudes and Opinions of People Who Use Medical Services about Privacy and Confidentiality of Health Information in Electronic Environment. Master’s Thesis. Middle East Technical University; 2011.
14. Alhur AA. The Effectiveness of E-learning in Saudi Arabia During the Spread of COVID-19. International Journal of Advanced Research in Education and Society. 2021;3(4):156-165.
15. Alhur A. Exploring Saudi Arabia Individuals’ Attitudes toward Electronic Personal Health Records. Journal of Computer Science and Technology Studies. 2022;4(1):80-87.
16. Alhur A. An Exploration of Nurses’ Perceptions of the Usefulness and Easiness of Using EMRs. Journal of Public Health Sciences. 2023;2(01):20-31.
17. Alhur A. An Investigation of Nurses’ Perceptions of the Usefulness and Easiness of Using Electronic Medical Records in Saudi Arabia: A Technology Acceptance Model: Technology Acceptance Model. Indonesian Journal of Information Systems. 2023;5(2):30-42.
18. Alhur A, Alhur AA. The Acceptance of Digital Health: What about Telepsychology and Telepsychiatry? Jurnal Sistem Informasi. 2022;18(2):18-35.
19. Jensen CS, Eg M. Confidentiality breaches in hospital: the experiences of young people and parents. Nursing Children and Young People. 2022;34(5).
20. Smit M, McAllister M, Slonim J. Privacy of electronic health records: Public opinion and practicalities. In: Networking and Electronic Commerce Research Conference, Lake Garda, Italy. ; 2005.
21. Vodicka E, Mejilla R, Leveille SG, et al. Online access to doctors’ notes: patient concerns about privacy. Journal of medical Internet research. 2013;15(9):e2670.
22. TA LDH. Personal health records. Health Informatics Journal. 2011;171:63-71.
23. Belfrage S, Helgesson G, Lynøe N. Trust and digital privacy in healthcare: a cross-sectional descriptive study of trust and attitudes towards uses of electronic health data among the general public in Sweden. BMC medical ethics. 2022;23(1):1-8.
24. Rolfe A, Cash-Gibson L, Car J, Sheikh A, McKinstry B. Interventions for improving patients’ trust in doctors and groups of doctors. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2014;(3).
25. Gopichandran V, Chetlapalli SK. Factors influencing trust in doctors: a community segmentation strategy for quality improvement in healthcare. BMJ open. 2013;3(12):e004115.
26. Richmond J, Boynton MH, Ozawa S, Muessig KE, Cykert S, Ribisl KM. Development and validation of the trust in my doctor, trust in doctors in general, and trust in the health care team scales. Social Science & Medicine. 2022;298:114827.
27. Wright EB, Holcombe C, Salmon P. Doctors’ communication of trust, care, and respect in breast cancer: qualitative study. Bmj. 2004;328(7444):864.
28. Douglass T, Calnan M. Trust matters for doctors? Towards an agenda for research. Social Theory & Health. 2016;14:393-413.
29. Thom DH, Hall MA, Pawlson LG. Measuring patients’ trust in physicians when assessing quality of care. Health affairs. 2004;23(4):124-132.
30. Larson HJ, Clarke RM, Jarrett C, et al. Measuring trust in vaccination: A systematic review. Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics. 2018;14(7):1599-1609.
31. Jao I, Kombe F, Mwalukore S, et al. Research stakeholders’ views on benefits and challenges for public health research data sharing in Kenya: the importance of trust and social relations. PloS one. 2015;10(9):e0135545.
32. Sheikh K, Freedman L, Ghaffar A, et al. Posting and transfer: key to fostering trust in government health services. Human Resources for Health. 2015;13(1):1-4.
33. Kuzu N, Ergin A, Zencir M. Patients’ awareness of their rights in a developing country. Public health. 2006;120(4):290-296.