Long-Term Cardiovascular Risk Screening in Women After Preeclampsia: A Prospective Cohort Study
Main Article Content
Keywords
Preeclampsia, cardiovascular disease, metabolic syndrome, postpartum screening, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk, endothelial dysfunction, microalbuminuria
Abstract
Background: Preeclampsia, affecting 3-8% of pregnancies, has emerged as a significant predictor of future cardiovascular disease. Women with preeclampsia history demonstrate persistent endothelial dysfunction, metabolic abnormalities, and chronic inflammatory states extending beyond pregnancy. Despite recognition as a cardiovascular risk enhancer by major cardiology societies, systematic postpartum cardiovascular screening remains inadequately implemented, particularly in resource-limited settings.
Methods: A prospective observational cohort study enrolled 200 postpartum women (100 with previous preeclampsia, 100 age-matched controls with normotensive pregnancies) at a tertiary care center. Comprehensive cardiovascular assessment included blood pressure measurement, anthropometric evaluation, and biochemical profiling encompassing fasting glucose, complete lipid panel, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), serum uric acid, and urine microalbumin-creatinine ratio. Metabolic syndrome was diagnosed using modified NCEP ATP III criteria, and 10-year atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk was calculated using pooled cohort equations. Statistical analysis employed independent t-tests, chi-square tests, Pearson correlation, and multivariate logistic regression.
Results: Women with prior preeclampsia demonstrated significantly elevated systolic blood pressure (133.8±11.6 versus 118.2±9.8 mmHg, p<0.001), diastolic blood pressure (86.4±8.2 versus 74.6±7.1 mmHg, p<0.001), body mass index (27.8±3.6 versus 24.7±3.0 kg/m², p<0.001), and waist circumference (89.6±7.9 versus 80.1±6.4 cm, p<0.001). Biochemically, the preeclampsia group exhibited higher LDL-cholesterol (132.4±27.8 versus 107.6±21.4 mg/dL, p<0.001), triglycerides (168.2±42.6 versus 126.4±34.8 mg/dL, p<0.001), hsCRP (4.7±2.2 versus 2.0±1.2 mg/L, p<0.001), uric acid (5.9±1.1 versus 4.8±0.9 mg/dL, p<0.001), and microalbuminuria (38.6±17.4 versus 13.8±5.6 mg/g creatinine, p<0.001). Prevalence of chronic hypertension (44.0% versus 8.0%, p<0.001), metabolic syndrome (41.0% versus 17.0%, p<0.001), prediabetes (36.0% versus 14.0%, p<0.001), and intermediate-to-high ASCVD risk (28.0% versus 6.0%, p<0.001) was substantially elevated in the preeclampsia cohort.
Conclusion: Women with preeclampsia history demonstrate significantly increased cardiovascular and metabolic risk burden during early postpartum years. These findings underscore the critical importance of implementing structured postpartum cardiovascular screening protocols, lifestyle modification counseling, and preventive interventions to mitigate long-term cardiovascular morbidity in this high-risk population
References
2.Brown MC, Best KE, Pearce MS, Waugh J, Robson SC, Bell R. Cardiovascular disease risk in women with pre-eclampsia: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Epidemiol. 2013;28(1):1-19. doi:10.1007/s10654-013-9762-6 PMID: 23397514
3.Zoet GA, Koster MP, Velthuis BK, et al. Determinants of future cardiovascular health in women with a history of preeclampsia. Maturitas. 2015;82(2):153-161. doi:10.1016/j.maturitas.2015.07.004 PMID: 26255679
4.Hermes W, Franx A, van Pampus MG, et al. Cardiovascular risk factors in women who had hypertensive disorders late in pregnancy: a cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;208(6):474.e1-8. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2013.02.016 PMID: 23399350
5.Kvehaugen AS, Dechend R, Ramstad HB, Troisi R, Fugelseth D, Staff AC. Endothelial function and circulating biomarkers are disturbed in women and children after preeclampsia. Hypertension. 2011;58(1):63-69. doi:10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.111.172387 PMID: 21606389
6.Fraser A, Nelson SM, Macdonald-Wallis C, et al. Associations of pregnancy complications with calculated cardiovascular disease risk and cardiovascular risk factors in middle age: the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children. Circulation. 2012;125(11):1367-1380. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.044784 PMID: 22344039
7.Hermes W, Tamsma JT, Grootendorst DC, et al. Cardiovascular risk estimation in women with a history of hypertensive pregnancy disorders at term: a longitudinal follow-up study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13:126. doi:10.1186/1471-2393-13-126 PMID: 23758792
8.Sandvik MK, Hallan S, Svarstad E, et al. Preeclampsia and prevalence of microalbuminuria 10 years later. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013;8(7):1126-1134. doi:10.2215/CJN.10681012 PMID: 23787238
9.Mottillo S, Filion KB, Genest J, et al. The metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular risk a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56(14):1113-1132. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2010.05.034 PMID: 20863953
10.Lykke JA, Langhoff-Roos J, Sibai BM, Funai EF, Triche EW, Paidas MJ. Hypertensive pregnancy disorders and subsequent cardiovascular morbidity and type 2 diabetes mellitus in the mother. Hypertension. 2009;53(6):944-951. doi:10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.109.130765 PMID: 19433776
11.Knowler WC, Barrett-Connor E, Fowler SE, et al. Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(6):393-403. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa012512 PMID: 11832527
12.Cusimano MC, Pudwell J, Roddy M, Cho CK, Smith GN. The maternal health clinic: an initiative for cardiovascular risk identification in women with pregnancy-related complications. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;210(5):438.e1-9. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2013.12.001 PMID: 24295922
13.Ridker PM, Cushman M, Stampfer MJ, Tracy RP, Hennekens CH. Inflammation, aspirin, and the risk of cardiovascular disease in apparently healthy men. N Engl J Med. 1997;336(14):973-979. doi:10.1056/NEJM199704033361401 PMID: 9077376
14.Esposito K, Pontillo A, Di Palo C, et al. Effect of weight loss and lifestyle changes on vascular inflammatory markers in obese women: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2003;289(14):1799-1804. doi:10.1001/jama.289.14.1799 PMID: 12684358
15.Kang DH, Park SK, Lee IK, Johnson RJ. Uric acid-induced C-reactive protein expression: implication on cell proliferation and nitric oxide production of human vascular cells. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005;16(12):3553-3562. doi:10.1681/ASN.2005050572 PMID: 16251237
16.Li M, Hu X, Fan Y, et al. Hyperuricemia and the risk for coronary heart disease morbidity and mortality a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2016;6:19520. doi:10.1038/srep19520 PMID: 26776707
17.McDonald SD, Han Z, Walsh MW, Gerstein HC, Devereaux PJ. Kidney disease after preeclampsia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Kidney Dis. 2010;55(6):1026-1039. doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2009.12.036 PMID: 20346562
18.Arnett DK, Blumenthal RS, Albert MA, et al. 2019 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2019;140(11):e596-e646. doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000000678 PMID: 30879355.

