PATTERN OF ADVERSE DRUG REACTIONS REPORTED AT THE ADVERSE DRUG REACTION MONITORING CENTRE (AMC-RIPER) AT A TERTIARY CARE TEACHING HOSPITAL IN INDIA: A RETROSPECTIVE OBSERVATIONAL STUDY

Main Article Content

Chenchu Suresh
Mosab Siddig Mohamed Ibrahim

Keywords

Adverse drug reactions, Pharmacovigilance, ADR Monitoring Centre, VigiFlow

Abstract

Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are an important cause of morbidity and may adversely affect patient safet. To analyze the demographic and clinical characteristics of reported ADRs and assess their distribution according to reporting source, seriousness, and annual reporting pattern over the study period. A retrospective observational study was conducted at AMC-RIPER, ADR reports documented over a five-year period from January 2021 to December 2025 were reviewed. Descriptive statistics were used for analysis. The VigiFlow export analyzed in the results contained 1,059 ADR report records. Among the 1,059 ADR reports analyzed, females accounted for 583 (55.05%) reports and males for 463 (43.72%), while sex was not reported in 13 (1.23%) reports. The mean age of patients with available age data was 37.25 ± 21.25 years, with a median age of 38 years and a range of 1–93 years. Regarding seriousness, 931 (87.91%) ADRs were classified as non-serious and 128 (12.09%) as serious. ADR reporting increased substantially during the later years of the available dataset, with the highest number of reports recorded in 2025.The study demonstrated a broad spectrum of suspected ADRs reported at AMC-RIPER, with a slight female predominance and adults representing the largest age group among reports with known age classification. Pharmacists made a major contribution to ADR reporting. Although most reported ADRs were non-serious, the presence of serious reactions emphasizes the need for continuous monitoring and timely intervention. The increase in reporting during the later years may reflect improved pharmacovigilance awareness, reporting practices, and documentation. Strengthening multidisciplinary participation, continuous ADR monitoring, timely reporting, and proper documentation may further improve medicine safety and promote rational use of medicines in the hospital setting.



Abstract 0 | PDF Downloads 0

References

1.Bowden SA, Edwards IR, Aronson JK. Adverse drug reactions: definitions, diagnosis, and management. The lancet. 2000 Oct 7;356(9237):1255-9.
2.Avorn J. Powerful medicines: the benefits, risks, and costs of prescription drugs. Vintage; 2005 Aug 9.
3.Stuart MC, Kouimtzi M, Hill S, editors. WHO model formulary 2008. World Health Organization; 2009.
4.Nebeker JR, Barach P, Samore MH. Clarifying adverse drug events: a clinician's guide to terminology, documentation, and reporting. Annals of internal medicine. 2004 May 18;140(10):795-801.
5.Alomar MJ. Factors affecting the development of adverse drug reactions. Saudi pharmaceutical journal. 2014 Apr;22(2):83-94.
6.Sultana J, Cutroneo P, Trifirò G. Clinical and economic burden of adverse drug reactions. Journal of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapeutics. 2013 Dec;4(1_suppl):S73-7.
7.Härmark L, van Grootheest A. Pharmacovigilance: methods, recent developments and future perspectives. European journal of clinical pharmacology. 2008 Aug;64(8):743-52.
8.Kalaiselvan V, Thota P, Singh GN. Pharmacovigilance Programme of India: Recent developments and future perspectives. Indian journal of pharmacology. 2016 Nov;48(6):624.
9.Singh P, Vaishnav Y, Verma S. Development of pharmacovigilance system in India and paradigm of pharmacovigilance research: an overview. Current Drug Safety. 2023 Nov 1;18(4):448-64.
10.Baniasadi S, Fahimi F, Shalviri G. Developing an adverse drug reaction reporting system at a teaching hospital. Basic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology. 2008 Apr;102(4):408-11.
11.Lalthanpuii K, Kaur J, Saini S, Bhatti K, Nain P. Strengthen the monitoring and reporting of adverse drug reaction at a tertiary teaching hospital. Archives of Pharmacy Practice. 2022;13(1-2022):61-7.
12.Sharma M, Baghel R, Thakur S, Adwal S. Surveillance of adverse drug reactions at an adverse drug reaction monitoring centre in Central India: a 7-year surveillance study. BMJ open. 2021 Oct;11(10):e052737.
13.Aung AK, Tang MJ, Adler NR, de Menezes SL, Goh MS, Tee HW, Trubiano JA, Puy R, Zubrinich CM, Graudins LV. Adverse drug reactions reported by healthcare professionals: reaction characteristics and time to reporting. The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. 2018 Oct;58(10):1332-9.
14.Desai CK, Iyer G, Panchal J, Shah S, Dikshit RK. An evaluation of knowledge, attitude, and practice of adverse drug reaction reporting among prescribers at a tertiary care hospital. Perspectives in Clinical research. 2011 Oct;2(4):129.
15.Kaufman G. Adverse drug reactions: classification, susceptibility and reporting. Nursing standard. 2016 Aug 10;30(50).
16.Aronson JK, Ferner RE. Joining the DoTS: new approach to classifying adverse drug reactions. Bmj. 2003 Nov 22;327(7425):1222-5.
17.Phillips EJ. Classifying ADRs–does dose matter? British journal of clinical pharmacology. 2015 Nov 2;81(1):10.