COMPARISION OF EFFICACY OF POST OPERATIVE ANALGESIA BY ULTRASOUND GUIDED BILATERAL ERECTOR SPINAE BLOCK USING 0.25 % LEVOPBUPIVACAINE WITH AND WITHOUT DEXMEDETOMIDINE IN ELECTIVE ADULT CARDIAC SURGERIES- RANDOMIZED DOUBLE BLINDED STUDY

Main Article Content

Dr. Shaik. Nisa Shafaqh
Dr. Srikakulapu Vijaya Rekha
Dr. Harish Babu Ravulapalli
Dr. A. Rajitha
Dr. K. Krishna Chaithanya

Keywords

Erector spinae block, elective cardiac surgeries, dexmedetomidine.

Abstract

Post operative pain after cardiac surgeries is not only due to sternotomy but also because of tissue damage, drains, thoracic-cage retraction. ESP block helps for postoperative analgesia and enhanced recovery after cardiac surgery.[1]


Aim of the study: To compare the efficacy of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to levobupivacaine in single shot erector spinae block.


Materials and Methods: A Prospective randomized controlled study done in 50 patients who have undergone various cardiac surgeries. Study population randomized into 2 groups, 25 in each group. (Group I is LD & Group II LP) at our institute. Pre-operative variables like age, gender, EF, EUROSCORE II. Intra operative variables like heart rate, systolic, diastolic, mean arterial pressure, SPO2,  opioid requirement & muscle relaxant. Post operative variables like heart rate, systolic, diastolic, mean arterial pressure, SPO2, VAS, SS, inotropic score, opioid consumption, duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU stay, total chest drain, use of blood products, time for first rescue analgesia were compared between both groups.


Results: Total opioid requirement [ p=0.212], time for 1st rescue analgesia [p=0.380] i.e. total duration of analgesia was similar in both groups & were statistically insignificant.


Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine when used as an adjuvant to 0.25% levobupivacaine for bilateral single shot ESP block didn’t provide superior analgesia compared to without dexmedetomidine in adult elective cardiac surgical patients.

Abstract 0 | Pdf Downloads 0

References

1. 1.King M, Stambulic T, Servito M, Mizubuti GB, Payne D, El-Diasty M. Erector spinae plane block as perioperative analgesia for midline sternotomy in cardiac surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Card Surg. 2022 Dec;37(12):5220-5229. doi: 10.1111/jocs.17005. Epub 2022 Oct 11. PMID: 36217996.
2. 2.WFSA, The Erector Spinae Plane Block: A Review of Current Evidence Araz Pourkashanian*, Madan Narayanan, Arun Venkataraju *Correspondence email: [email protected].
3. 3. Guo, Y., Wang, J., Jiang, P. et al. Effect of erector spinae plane block with different doses of dexmedetomidine as adjuvant for ropivacaine on the postoperative quality of recovery after video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy surgery: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol 23, 264 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-023-02231-9.
4. 4. Kodali VRK, Shree S, Prasad M, Sambandam KKG, Karthekeyan RB, Vakamudi M. A Comparative Study of Bilateral Erector Spinae Block Versus Intravenous Dexmedetomidine for Perioperative Pain Management in Patients Undergoing Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting - A Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2022 Nov;36(11):4085-4092. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2022.07.015. Epub 2022 Jul 16. PMID: 35970671.
5. 5. Gad M, Abdelwahab K, Abdallah A, Abdelkhalek M, Abdelaziz M. Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block Compared to Modified Pectoral Plane Block for Modified Radical Mastectomy Operations. Anesth Essays Res. 2019 Apr-Jun;13(2):334-339. doi: 10.4103/aer.AER_77_19. PMID: 31198256; PMCID: PMC6545931.
6. 6.Altıparmak B, Korkmaz Toker M, Uysal Aİ, Gümüş Demirbilek S. Comparison of the efficacy of erector spinae plane block performed with different concentrations of bupivacaine on postoperative analgesia after mastectomy surgery: ramdomized, prospective, double blinded trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2019 Mar 4;19(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12871-019-0700-3. PMID: 30832580; PMCID: PMC6399855.
7. 7. Krishna SN, Chauhan S, Bhoi D, Kaushal B, Hasija S, Sangdup T, Bisoi AK. Bilateral Erector Spinae Plane Block for Acute Post-Surgical Pain in Adult Cardiac Surgical Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2019 Feb;33(2):368-375. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2018.05.050. Epub 2018 Jun 4. Erratum in: J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2022 Feb;36(2):627. PMID: 30055991.
8. 8. Macaire P, Ho N, Nguyen T, Nguyen B, Vu V, Quach C, Roques V, Capdevila X. Ultrasound-Guided Continuous Thoracic Erector Spinae Plane Block Within an Enhanced Recovery Program Is Associated with Decreased Opioid Consumption and Improved Patient Postoperative Rehabilitation After Open Cardiac Surgery-A Patient-Matched, Controlled Before-and-After Study. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2019 Jun;33(6):1659-1667. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2018.11.021. Epub 2018 Nov 19. PMID: 30665850.
9. 9.Borys M, Gawęda B, Horeczy B, Kolowca M, Olszówka P, Czuczwar M, et al. Erector spinae-plane block as an analgesic alternative in patients undergoing mitral and/or tricuspid valve repair through a right mini-thoracotomy - An observational cohort study. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2020;15:208–14
10. 10. Vaughan BN, Bartone CL, McCarthy CM, Answini GA, Hurford WE. Ultrasound-guided continuous bilateral erector spinae plane blocks are associated with reduced opioid consumption and length of stay for open cardiac surgery: A retrospective cohort study. J Clin Med. 2021;10:5022.
11. 11. Oğur L, Akesen S, Gören S, Kan İİ, Başağan Moğol E, Gurbet A. Comparison of Intra- and postoperative effectiveness of erector spinae plane block and patient controlled analgesia in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. Am J Transl Res. 2022;14:2469–79.
12. 12.Roy N, Brown ML, Parra MF, Sleeper LA, Alrayashi W, Nasr VG, et al. Bilateral erector spinae blocks decrease perioperative opioid use after pediatric cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2021;35:2082–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
13. 13. Wasfy SF, Kamhawy GA, Omar AH, Abd El Aziz HF. Bilateral continuous erector spinae block versus multimodal intravenous analgesia in coronary bypass surgery. A randomized trial. Egypt J Anaesth. 2021;37:152–8. [Google Scholar]
14. 14.. Statzer NJ, Plackis AC, Woolard AA, Allen BFS, Siegrist KK, Shi Y, et al. Erector spinae plane catheter analgesia in minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: A retrospective case-control study for inclusion in an enhanced recovery program. Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2022:10892532221104420. doi: 10.1177/10892532221104420. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
15. 15. Kaushal B, Chauhan S, Magoon R, Krishna NS, Saini K, Bhoi D, et al. Efficacy of bilateral erector spinae plane block in management of acute postoperative surgical pain after pediatric cardiac surgeries through a midline sternotomy. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2020;34:981–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
16. 16. Sun Y, Luo X, Yang X, Zhu X, Yang C, Pan T, et al. Benefits and risks of intermittent bolus erector spinae plane block through a catheter for patients after cardiac surgery through a lateral mini-thoracotomy: A propensity score matched retrospective cohort study. J Clin Anesth. 2021;75:110489. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
17. 17. Vaughan BN, Bartone CL, McCarthy CM, Answini GA, Hurford WE. Ultrasound-guided continuous bilateral erector spinae plane blocks are associated with reduced opioid consumption and length of stay for open cardiac surgery: A retrospective cohort study. J Clin Med. 2021;10:5022. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
18. 18. Zhang Y, Chong JH, Harky A. Enhanced recovery after cardiac surgery and its impact on outcomes: A systematic review. Perfusion. 2022;37:162–74. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
19. 19. Gregory AJ, Grant MC, Manning MW, Cheung AT, Ender J, Sander M, et al. Enhanced recovery after cardiac surgery (ERAS Cardiac) recommendations: An important first step-but there is much work to be done. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2020;34:39–47. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
20. 20. Engelman DT, Ben Ali W, Williams JB, Perrault LP, Reddy VS, Arora RC, et al. Guidelines for perioperative care in cardiac surgery: Enhanced recovery after surgery society recommendations. JAMA Surg. 2019;154:755–66. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
21. 21. Jiang T, Ting A, Leclerc M, Calkins K, Huang J. Regional anesthesia in cardiac surgery: A review of the literature. Cureus. 2021;13:e18808. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
22. 22. Liu H, Emelife PI, Prabhakar A, Moll V, Kendrick JB, Parr AT, et al. Regional anesthesia considerations for cardiac surgery. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2019;33:387–406. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
23. 23. Balan C, Bubenek-Turconi SI, Tomescu DR, Valeanu L. Ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia-Current strategies for enhanced recovery after cardiac surgery. Medicina (Kaunas) 2021;57:312.
24. 24.Devarajan J, Balasubramanian S, Shariat AN, Bhatt HV. Regional analgesia for cardiac surgery. Part 2: Peripheral regional analgesia for cardiac surgery. Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2021;25:265–79. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
25. 25. Nazarnia S, Subramaniam K. Nonopioid analgesics in postoperative pain management after cardiac surgery. Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2021;25:280–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
26. 26. Chin KJ, Versyck B, Pawa A. Ultrasound-guided fascial plane blocks of the chest wall: A state-of-the-art review. Anaesthesia. 2021;76(Suppl 1):110–26. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
27. 27. Forero M, Adhikary SD, Lopez H, Tsui C, Chin KJ. The erector spinae plane block: A novel analgesic technique in thoracic neuropathic pain. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016;41:621–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
28. 28. Tsui BCH, Fonseca A, Munshey F, McFadyen G, Caruso TJ. The erector spinae plane (ESP) block: A pooled review of 242 cases. J Clin Anesth. 2019;53:29–34. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
29. 29. Toscano A, Capuano P, Galatà M, Tazzi I, Rinaldi M, Brazzi L. Safety of ultrasound-guided serratus anterior and erector spinae fascial plane blocks: A retrospective analysis in patients undergoing cardiac surgery while receiving anticoagulant and antiplatelet drugs. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2022;36:483–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
30. 30. Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev. 2015;4:1. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]