ASSESSMENT AND COMPARISION OF LARYNGOTRACHEAL MORBIDITY BY INFLATING ENDOTRACHEAL TUBE (ETT) CUFF WITH AIR, 0.9% SALINE, 1% PROPOFOL AND HYDROCORTISONE
Main Article Content
Keywords
laryngoscopy, Endotracheal, propofol , hemodynamic, post-extubation
Abstract
Background and aim: Endotracheal intubation while administering general anaesthesia and inflation of the cuff with air is a common practice. Continuous pressure exerted by cuff on mucosa may lead to postoperative complaints such as sore throat, cough, and dysphagia, which are very disturbing to the patient. Hence, we hypothesized that inflation of cuff with propofol may reduce the incidence of these complications as a result of cushioning effect as well as nondiffusion of nitrous oxide into it. Our aim was to compare the effects of inflation of endotracheal tube cuff with 0.9% saline, 4% lignocaine, and 1% propofol on the incidence of postoperative laryngotracheal morbidity in terms of cough, sore throat, dysphagia and hoarseness of voice with general anaesthesia. Methods: Patients scheduled for elective surgery under general anaesthesia were randomly allocated into four groups of thirty each according to cuff inflation media: air (Group A), 0.9% saline (Group S), 1% propofol (Group P) and hydrocortisone (Group HC). The incidence of cough was noted at 15, 30 and 60 min intervals after extubation. The occurrence and severity of postoperative sore throat (POST) was evaluated at 2, 6, and 24 h after extubating. Results: The incidence of cough was maximum in Group A and minimum in Group P (P < 0.05). The occurrence of POST was highest in Group A, followed by Group S and Group HC, and least in Group P. The hemodynamic parameters were comparable with no statistical difference in all the four groups. Conclusion: 1% propofol is found to be superior to hydrocortisone and normal saline in the prevention of cough and sore throat postoperatively, when compared to air.
References
2.Biro P, Seifert B, Pasch T. Complaints of sore throat after tracheal intubation: a prospective evaluation. European Journal of Anaesthesiology. 2005;22(4):307-311.
3.Parveen S, Malik P, Yadav K, Kaur H. A comparative study on airway morbidity with air, saline, and alkalinized lidocaine used for inflation of tracheal tube cuffs. National Journal of Maxillofacial Surgery. 2025 Sep 1;16(3):486-91.
4.Rajegowda SK, Ashwini GS. Intra-Cuff lignocaine, saline, air and hydrocortisone on incidence of post-extubation airway complications–A randomised controlled study. Indian J Clin Anaesth. 2019;6(4):502-7.
5.Gupta P, Sharma S, Vishnoi A, Kanoji S, Moin K. The comparison of inflation of cuff with 1% propofol, 4% lignocaine, or 0.9% saline on laryngotracheal morbidity. Anesthesia Essays and Researches. 2022 Jul 1;16(3):311-5.
6.Budania LS, Chamala V, Rao M, Virmani S, Goyal KA, Nanda K. Effect of air, anesthetic gas mixture, saline, or 2% lignocaine used for tracheal tube cuff inflation on coughing and laryngotracheal morbidity after tracheal extubation. Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology. 2018 Jul 1;34(3):386-91.
7.Rashmi NR, Shashidhar GS, Balabhaskar S, Kiranchand N. Comparison of intracuff air, lignocaine, lignocaine with sodium bicarbonate and ketamine for attenuating postoperative sore throat. Int J Anesthesiol. 2017 Jul;3(1):5-8.
8.Shah PA, Nadkarni AS, Chavda DB, Patel JB, Thomas SM. Comparative study of endotracheal tube cuff inflation with air versus alkalinized lidocaine on hemodynamic response during extubation. Indian J Clin Anaesth. 2026 May 05;11(4):464-470.

