THE MOST COMMON RANGE OF AXIAL LENGTH IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING CATARACT EXTRACTION IN PAKISTANI POPULATION
Main Article Content
Keywords
Axial Length, IOL Power Calculation, Cataract Extraction
Abstract
Objective: To determine the frequency of patients falling in various ranges of axial length recorded and most common range in our community undergoing cataract extraction.
Methods: A cross sectional study conducted at department of Ophthalmology, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, Lahore. 400 patients, fulfilling the inclusion criteria were selected. Axial length measured separately on each eye. A total of 10 measurements were taken for each eye, mean of which recorded in the proforma designed for the study. Data analysis was done using IBM SPSS version 20.0.
Results: The patient’s age ranged between 40-70 years with a mean of 56.92±9.15 years. 206 (51.5%) patients were males and 194 (48.5%) females. The mean axial length was 22.93±1.28mm and 22.86±1.19mm in right and left eyes respectively. The most common axial length ranged between 19-23mm in both eyes (57.5% in right eye, 59.3% in left eye) followed by 23-25mm (40.3% in right eye, 38.5% in left eye). There was no significant variation in axial length across age and gender.
Conclusion: The commonest range of axial length in Pakistani population is 19-23mm followed by 23-25mm regardless of age and gender.
References
2. Chylack LT Jr, Wolfe JK, Singer DM, Leske MC, Bullimore MA, Bailey IL, Friend J, McCarthy D, Wu SY. The Lens Opacities Classification System III. The Longitudinal Study of Cataract Study Group. Arch Ophthalmol 1993; 111(6):831-6.
3. Lim LH, Lee SY, Ang CL. Factors affecting the predictability of SRK II in patients with normal axial length undergoing phacoemulsification surgery. Singapore Med J 2009; 50(2):120-5.
4. Norrby S. Sources of error in intraocular lens power calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg 2008; 34(3):368-76.
5. Preußner P-R, Olsen T, Hoffmann PC, Findl O. Intraocular lens calculation accuracy limits in normal eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg 2008; 34:802–8
6. Lagrasta JM, Allemann N, Scapucin L, Moeller CT, Ohkawara LE, Melo LA Jr, Soriano ES, Casanova FH. Clinical results in phacoemulsification using the SRK/T formula. Arq Bras Oftalmol 2009; 72(2):189-93.
7. Javed EA, Sultan M. Cataract surgery; axial length variation. Professional Med J 2008; 15(3):387-91.
8. Warrier S, Wu HM, Newland HS, Muecke J, Selva D, Aung T, Casson RJ: Ocular biometry and determinants of refractive error in rural Myanmar: the Meiktila Eye Study. Br J Ophthalmol 2008; 92(12):1591-4.
9. He M, Huang W, Li Y, Zheng Y, Yin Q, Foster PJ: Refractive error and biometry in older Chinese adults: the Liwan eye study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2009;50(11):5130-6.
10. Fotedar R, Wang JJ, Burlutsky G, Morgan IG, Rose K, Wong TY, Mitchell P: Distribution of axial length and ocular biometry measured using partial coherence laser interferometry (IOL Master) in an older white population. Ophthalmology 2010;117(3):417-23.
11. Shufelt C, Fraser-Bell S, Ying-Lai M, Torres M, Varma R: Refractive error, ocular biometry, and lens opalescence in an adult population: the Los Angeles Latino Eye Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005;46(12):4450-60.
12. Jivrajka R, Shammas MC, Boenzi T, Swearingen M, Shammas HJ: Variability of axial length, anterior chamber depth, and lens thickness in the cataractous eye. J Cataract Refract Surg 2008;34(2):289-94.
13. Velez-Montoya R, Shusterman EM, Lopez-Miranda MJ, Mayorquin-Ruiz M, Salcedo-Villanueva G, Quiroz-Mercado H, Morales-Canton V: Comparison of the biometric values obtained by two different A-mode ultrasound devices (Eye Cubed vs. PalmScan): a transversal, descriptive, and comparative study. BMC Ophthalmol 2010;10:8.

