DIAGNOSTIC EFFICACY OF HIGH-RESOLUTION ULTRASOUND IN CLINICALLY SUSPECTED PATIENTS OF ROTATOR CUFF TEAR AND ITS CORRELATION WITH MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING

Main Article Content

Dr Anushka Bharadwaj
Dr. Sukharam Bhamu
Dr. Ravinder Kumar Kundu

Keywords

Rotator cuff tear, Ultrasonography, Magnetic resonance imaging, Shoulder pain, Diagnostic accuracy, Supraspinatus tendon

Abstract

Background: Rotator cuff tears (RCTs) are among the most common causes of shoulder pain and disability, particularly in middle-aged and elderly individuals. Accurate diagnosis is essential for appropriate management and prevention of long-term functional impairment. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is considered the reference standard for non-invasive evaluation of rotator cuff pathology; however, high-resolution ultrasonography (USG) offers a cost-effective, readily available, and dynamic alternative. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of high-resolution USG in clinically suspected patients with rotator cuff tears and correlate its findings with MRI.


Materials and Methods: This hospital-based cross-sectional observational study was conducted in the Department of Radio-diagnosis, Geetanjali Medical College & Hospital, Udaipur, over a period of 18 months. A total of 58 adult patients with clinically suspected rotator cuff tears were enrolled using consecutive sampling. All participants underwent both high-resolution ultrasonography and 3-Tesla MRI of the affected shoulder. MRI was used as the reference standard. Diagnostic performance of USG was assessed by calculating sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), diagnostic accuracy, and Cohen’s kappa coefficient.


Results: The mean age of the study population was 53.4 ± 13.6 years, with a male predominance (63.8%). The supraspinatus tendon was the most commonly affected tendon on both USG (79.3%) and MRI (84.5%). Partial-thickness tears were the most frequent pathology identified on MRI (48.3%), followed by full-thickness tears (24.1%). Using MRI as the reference standard, USG demonstrated an overall sensitivity of 90.5%, specificity of 93.8%, PPV of 97.4%, NPV of 78.9%, and diagnostic accuracy of 91.4%, with excellent agreement (κ = 0.80). For full-thickness tears, USG achieved sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 92.9%, 97.7%, and 96.6%, respectively (κ = 0.91). For partial-thickness tears, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 82.1%, 90.0%, and 86.2%, respectively (κ = 0.72). MRI was superior in detecting muscle atrophy, fatty infiltration, joint effusion, and labral pathology.


Conclusion: MulHigh-resolution ultrasonography demonstrated excellent diagnostic accuracy and strong agreement with MRI in the detection of rotator cuff tears, particularly full-thickness tears. Given its accessibility, lower cost, and ability to provide dynamic real-time assessment, USG can be considered an effective first-line imaging modality for patients with suspected rotator cuff pathology, while MRI remains valuable for equivocal cases, preoperative planning, and evaluation of associated intra-articular abnormalities.


 

Abstract 0 | PDF Downloads 0

References

Terry GC, Chopp TM. Functional anatomy of the shoulder complex. J Athl Train. 2000;35(3):248-255.
2. Clark JM, Harryman DT. Tendons, ligaments, and capsule of the rotator cuff. Gross and microscopic anatomy. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992;74(5):713-725.
3. Zhao J, Zeng L, Liang G, et al. Risk factors for symptomatic rotator cuff tears: a retrospective case-control study. Front Med. 2024;10:1321939.
4. Yamamoto A, Takagishi K, Osawa T, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of a rotator cuff tear in the general population. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010;19(1):116-120.
5. Minagawa H, Yamamoto N, Abe H, et al. Prevalence of symptomatic and asymptomatic rotator cuff tears in the general population: from mass-screening in one village. J Orthop. 2013;10(1):8-12.
6. Pearson ZC, Agarwal AR, Garcia A, et al. Epidemiology, natural history, and indications for treatment of rotator cuff tears. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2024;8(7):e24.00115.
7. Yamaguchi K, Ditsios K, Middleton WD, et al. The demographic and morphological features of rotator cuff disease. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88(8):1699-1704.
8. Dinnes J, Loveman E, McIntyre L, Waugh N. The effectiveness of diagnostic tests for the assessment of shoulder pain due to soft tissue disorders: a systematic review. Health Technol Assess. 2003;7(29):iii,1-166.
9. Teefey SA, Hasan SA, Middleton WD, et al. Ultrasonography of the rotator cuff. A comparison of ultrasonographic and arthroscopic findings in one hundred consecutive cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82(4):498-504.
10. Rutten MJ, Jager GJ, Blickman JG. US of the rotator cuff: pitfalls, limitations, and artifacts. Radiographics. 2006;26(2):589-604.
11. Zlatkin MB, Iannotti JP, Roberts MC, et al. Rotator cuff tears: diagnostic performance of MR imaging. Radiology. 1989;172(1):223-229.
12. Magee T, Williams D. 3.0-T MRI of the supraspinatus tendon. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;187(4):881-886.
13. de Jesus JO, Parker L, Frangos AJ, Nazarian LN. Accuracy of MRI, MR arthrography, and ultrasound in the diagnosis of rotator cuff tears: a meta-analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;192(6):1701-1707.
14. Farooqi AS, Lee A, Novikov D, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography for rotator cuff tears: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Orthop J Sports Med. 2021;9(10):23259671211035106.
15. Chauhan NS, Ahluwalia A, Sharma YP, Thakur L. A prospective comparative study of high-resolution ultrasound and MRI in the diagnosis of rotator cuff tears in a tertiary hospital of North India. Pol J Radiol. 2016;81:491-497.
16. Chauhan NS, Ahluwalia A, Sharma YP, Thakur L. A prospective comparative study of high-resolution ultrasound and MRI in the diagnosis of rotator cuff tears in a tertiary hospital of North India. Pol J Radiol. 2016;81:491-497.
17. Madhavi P, Patil P. Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of rotator cuff injury. Cureus. 2024;16(8):e68199.
18. Naqvi GA, Jadaan M, Harrington P. Accuracy of ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging for detection of full thickness rotator cuff tears. Int J Shoulder Surg. 2009;3(4):94-97.
19. Zhao J, Zeng L, Liang G, et al. Risk factors for symptomatic rotator cuff tears. Front Med. 2024;10:1321939.
20. Wendelboe AM, Hegmann KT, Gren LH, Alder SC, White GL, Lyon JL. An epidemiologic study of lifestyle and occupational risk factors for rotator cuff tendonitis. Clin Epidemiol. 2004;57(10):1050-1056.
21. Gumina S, Candela V, Passaretti D, Latino G, Venditto T, Mariani L, et al. The association between body fat and rotator cuff tear: the influence on rotator cuff tear sizes. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014;23(11):1669-1674.
22. Pearson ZC, Agarwal AR, Garcia A, et al. Epidemiology of rotator cuff tears. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2024;8(7):e24.00115.
23. Codman EA. The Shoulder: Rupture of the Supraspinatus Tendon and Other Lesions in or about the Subacromial Bursa. Boston: Thomas Todd Company; 1934.
24. Rathbun JB, Macnab I. The microvascular pattern of the rotator cuff. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1970;52(3):540-553.
25. Jerosch J, Mueller T, Castro WH. The incidence of rotator cuff rupture: an anatomic study. Acta Orthop Belg. 1991;57(2):124-129.
26. Mohtasib RS, Alzahrani AM, Asiri YN, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of shoulder ultrasound in detection of rotator cuff pathologies: a retrospective cohort study. Ann Saudi Med. 2019;39(3):162-171.
27. Farooqi AS, Lee A, Novikov D, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography for rotator cuff tears: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Orthop J Sports Med. 2021;9(10):23259671211035106.
28. Bigliani LU, Morrison DS, April EW. The morphology of the acromion and its relationship to rotator cuff tears. Orthop Trans. 1986;10:228.
29. Neer CS. Anterior acromioplasty for the chronic impingement syndrome in the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1972;54(1):41-50.
30. Teefey SA, Rubin DA, Middleton WD, et al. Detection and quantification of rotator cuff tears. Comparison of ultrasonographic, magnetic resonance imaging and arthroscopic findings. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86(4):708-716.
31. Saraya S, El Bakry R. Ultrasound: can it replace MRI in the evaluation of the rotator cuff tears? Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med. 2016;47(1):193-201.
32. Singh A, Thukral CL, Gupta K, et al. Role and correlation of high-resolution ultrasound and MRI in evaluation of patients with shoulder pain. Pol J Radiol. 2017;82:410-417.
33. Iannotti JP, Ciccone J, Buss DD, et al. Accuracy of office-based ultrasonography of the shoulder for the diagnosis of rotator cuff tears. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87(6):1305-1311.
34. Goutallier D, Postel JM, Bernageau J, Lavau L, Voisin MC. Fatty muscle degeneration in cuff ruptures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;(304):78-83.