CLINICO-RADIOLOGICAL AND SEROLOGICAL PROFILE OF INTERSTITIAL LUNG DISEASE INCLUDING CONNECTIVE TISSUE DISEASE-ASSOCIATED ILD: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY AT A TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL

Main Article Content

Dr. C.A. Umesh Varma
Dr. A. Vivek Thanga Durai

Keywords

Interstitial lung disease; CTD-ILD; IPF; hypersensitivity pneumonitis; HRCT; UIP; GAP score; DLCO; multi-disciplinary discussion

Abstract

Background: Interstitial lung disease (ILD) encompasses a heterogeneous group of diffuse parenchymal lung disorders with distinct aetiologies, radiological patterns, and prognoses. Connective tissue disease-associated ILD (CTD-ILD) constitutes a significant proportion of ILD cases and warrants systematic serological evaluation. Multi-disciplinary discussion (MDD) is the diagnostic gold standard. Methods: A cross-sectional study enrolled 120 adults diagnosed with ILD through multidisciplinary discussion (MDD) at a tertiary care hospital over 24 months. Comprehensive serological, spirometric, HRCT (ATS-2018 UIP classification), 6MWT, and GAP score assessments were performed. Results: CTD-ILD was the most common diagnostic category (32.5%), followed by hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP, 21.7%), IPF (18.3%), sarcoidosis (12.5%), NSIP (8.3%), and others (6.7%). UIP/probable-UIP pattern on HRCT was present in 62.5% of IPF cases. Mean FVC% predicted was 63.8%; DLCO% 48.2%; mean 6MWD 348 m (desaturation in 41.7%). GAP Stage III was documented in 22.5%. Independent predictors of GAP Stage III included DLCO <35% (aOR 4.1), age ≥65 years (aOR 3.2), and male sex in IPF (aOR 2.0). Conclusion: CTD-ILD is the leading ILD category at this tertiary care hospital. Systematic connective tissue serology — including myositis panel — should be part of all new ILD evaluations. DLCO and 6MWT are the most sensitive functional impairment markers and reliable GAP stage predictors.


 


 

Abstract 0 | pdf Downloads 0

References

1. Travis WD, Costabel U, Hansell DM, et al. An official ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT statement: idiopathic interstitial pneumonias: understanding, diagnosis, and management. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013;188(6):733-48.
2. Raghu G, Collard HR, Egan JJ, et al. An official ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT statement: idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: evidence-based guidelines for diagnosis and management. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011;183(6):788-824.
3. Fischer A, Antoniou KM, Brown KK, et al. An official European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society research statement: interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features. Eur Respir J. 2015;46(4):976-87.
4. Vij R, Noth I, Strek ME. Autoimmune-featured interstitial lung disease: a distinct entity. Chest. 2011;140(5):1292-9.
5. Raghu G, Remy-Jardin M, Ryerson CJ, et al. Diagnosis of hypersensitivity pneumonitis in adults. An official ATS/JRS/ALAT clinical practice guideline. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020;202(3):e36-69.
6. Raghu G, Remy-Jardin M, Richeldi L, et al. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (an update) and progressive pulmonary fibrosis in adults: an official ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT clinical practice guideline. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2022;205(9):e18-47.
7. Ley B, Ryerson CJ, Vittinghoff E, et al. A multidimensional index and staging system for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Ann Intern Med. 2012;156(10):684-91.
8. Cottin V, Crestani B, Valeyre D, et al. Diagnosis and management of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: French practical guidelines. Eur Respir Rev. 2014;23(132):193-214.
9. Oliveira DS, Dall'Ara GH, Borba EF, Shikuma N, Pereira RM. Clinico-radiologic features and outcomes in patients with interstitial lung disease related to connective tissue disease. Rheumatol Int. 2014;34(5):643-9.
10. Tanizawa K, Handa T, Nakashima R, et al. HRCT features of interstitial lung disease with anti-aminoacyl tRNA synthetase antibodies. Respir Med. 2011;105(9):1316-21.