CLINICO-RADIOLOGICAL AND SEROLOGICAL PROFILE OF INTERSTITIAL LUNG DISEASE INCLUDING CONNECTIVE TISSUE DISEASE-ASSOCIATED ILD: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY AT A TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL
Main Article Content
Keywords
Interstitial lung disease; CTD-ILD; IPF; hypersensitivity pneumonitis; HRCT; UIP; GAP score; DLCO; multi-disciplinary discussion
Abstract
Background: Interstitial lung disease (ILD) encompasses a heterogeneous group of diffuse parenchymal lung disorders with distinct aetiologies, radiological patterns, and prognoses. Connective tissue disease-associated ILD (CTD-ILD) constitutes a significant proportion of ILD cases and warrants systematic serological evaluation. Multi-disciplinary discussion (MDD) is the diagnostic gold standard. Methods: A cross-sectional study enrolled 120 adults diagnosed with ILD through multidisciplinary discussion (MDD) at a tertiary care hospital over 24 months. Comprehensive serological, spirometric, HRCT (ATS-2018 UIP classification), 6MWT, and GAP score assessments were performed. Results: CTD-ILD was the most common diagnostic category (32.5%), followed by hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP, 21.7%), IPF (18.3%), sarcoidosis (12.5%), NSIP (8.3%), and others (6.7%). UIP/probable-UIP pattern on HRCT was present in 62.5% of IPF cases. Mean FVC% predicted was 63.8%; DLCO% 48.2%; mean 6MWD 348 m (desaturation in 41.7%). GAP Stage III was documented in 22.5%. Independent predictors of GAP Stage III included DLCO <35% (aOR 4.1), age ≥65 years (aOR 3.2), and male sex in IPF (aOR 2.0). Conclusion: CTD-ILD is the leading ILD category at this tertiary care hospital. Systematic connective tissue serology — including myositis panel — should be part of all new ILD evaluations. DLCO and 6MWT are the most sensitive functional impairment markers and reliable GAP stage predictors.
References
2. Raghu G, Collard HR, Egan JJ, et al. An official ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT statement: idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: evidence-based guidelines for diagnosis and management. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011;183(6):788-824.
3. Fischer A, Antoniou KM, Brown KK, et al. An official European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society research statement: interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features. Eur Respir J. 2015;46(4):976-87.
4. Vij R, Noth I, Strek ME. Autoimmune-featured interstitial lung disease: a distinct entity. Chest. 2011;140(5):1292-9.
5. Raghu G, Remy-Jardin M, Ryerson CJ, et al. Diagnosis of hypersensitivity pneumonitis in adults. An official ATS/JRS/ALAT clinical practice guideline. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020;202(3):e36-69.
6. Raghu G, Remy-Jardin M, Richeldi L, et al. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (an update) and progressive pulmonary fibrosis in adults: an official ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT clinical practice guideline. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2022;205(9):e18-47.
7. Ley B, Ryerson CJ, Vittinghoff E, et al. A multidimensional index and staging system for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Ann Intern Med. 2012;156(10):684-91.
8. Cottin V, Crestani B, Valeyre D, et al. Diagnosis and management of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: French practical guidelines. Eur Respir Rev. 2014;23(132):193-214.
9. Oliveira DS, Dall'Ara GH, Borba EF, Shikuma N, Pereira RM. Clinico-radiologic features and outcomes in patients with interstitial lung disease related to connective tissue disease. Rheumatol Int. 2014;34(5):643-9.
10. Tanizawa K, Handa T, Nakashima R, et al. HRCT features of interstitial lung disease with anti-aminoacyl tRNA synthetase antibodies. Respir Med. 2011;105(9):1316-21.

