POPULATION-BASED OUTCOMES OF INTACT CANAL WALL MASTOIDECTOMY FOR CHRONIC SUPPURATIVE OTITIS MEDIA WITH INTACT OSSICULAR CHAIN: FUNCTIONAL AND AUDIOLOGICAL DETERMINANTS IN RELATION TO DEMOGRAPHIC AND SOCIOECONOMIC VARIABLES
Main Article Content
Keywords
CSOM, Compliance, PTA, Mastoidectomy and Hearing loss
Abstract
Background: suppurative otitis media (CSOM), including tubotympanic disease and limited cholesteatoma confined to the antrum and aditus with an intact ossicular chain, remains a major cause of preventable hearing impairment, particularly in socioeconomically disadvantaged populations. Intact canal wall (ICW) procedures aim to eradicate disease while preserving middle ear anatomy and functional hearing. Intact canal wall (ICW) mastoidectomy with tympanoplasty is widely performed for CSOM with intact ossicular chain aimed at disease eradication and hearing preservation. This study evaluates demographic (age, gender), socioeconomic (education, economic status), clinical (time to surgical intervention, hospital stay), audiological (PTA, ABG, impedance), complications, interaural attenuation, and functional subjective acceptance of residual hearing. Methods: A population-based cohort of CSOM patients undergoing ICW surgery between October 2023 and September 2025 was analyzed. Variables collected included socio-demographics, duration from symptom onset to surgery, pre- and postoperative PTA, ABG, impedance audiometry, complications, interaural attenuation, and subjective hearing acceptance. Statistical analyses explored associations of outcomes with demographic and socioeconomic factors.
Results: Of the 87 patients included, significant improvements were noted in mean PTA thresholds and ABG (pre vs post, p < 0.05). Impedance findings improved postoperatively in 76/87 patients [87.35%]. Early surgical intervention and higher education status were associated with better functional outcomes (p < 0.01). Complication rates were low. Subjective acceptance correlated with objective audiological gains.
Conclusion: This population-based study confirms that intact canal wall (ICW) mastoidectomy with tympanoplasty is a safe and effective surgical option for selected cases of chronic suppurative otitis media with an intact ossicular chain. Significant postoperative audiological improvement was demonstrated, with mean pure tone average improving from 38.45 ± 3.15 dB to 22.65 ± 2.30 dB and air–bone gap reducing from 26.45 ± 3.50 dB to 10.18 ± 1.15 dB (p < 0.05). Improved middle ear compliance was observed in 87.35% of patients, while interaural attenuation improved in 65.52%.
References
2. Arndt S, Deguine O, Nevoux J, et al. Long-term outcomes of tympanoplasty with persistent air-bone gap in adults with COM: hearing, health care utilization and quality of life. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2025;282(10):5049-5059. (PMC)
3. Sarolli EB, et al. Tympanoplasty and auditory improvements: mixed methods. PubMed. 2024. (PubMed)
4. Cross-sectional study on ossicular discontinuity predictors. Audiol Neurotol. 2025;21(4):231- 240. (Karger Publishers)
5. Endoscopic revision surgery outcomes for ossiculoplasty. PubMed. 2023. (PubMed)
6. Prognostic factors of hearing outcome post tympanoplasty. Ann Transl Med. 2022;10:1169. (PMC)
7. Surgical outcomes of ICW mastoidectomy with tympanoplasty and cartilage reconstruction. IOSR-JDMS. 2025;24(6):22-27. (IOSR Journals)
8. Recurrence rate & hearing outcomes: endoscopic-assisted CWU vs CWD mastoidectomy. Egypt J Otolaryngol. 2026. (ResearchGate)
9. Correlation of middle ear risk indices and hearing outcome in tympanoplasty. J Clin Otorhinolaryngol. 2025;XX: 435-55. (Springer)
10. CWU mastoidectomy recurrence and ABG comparative results. IJLBPR. 2025. (IJL BPR)
11. Comparison of tympanoplasty with mastoidectomy in tubotympanic CSOM. J Ayub Med Coll. 2024. (Journal of Ayub Medical College)
12. CWU tympanoplasty ABG & ossicular status. SEEJPH. 2025;26:3327-. (SeeJPH)
13. Prospective comparative ICW vs CWD outcomes. IJPQA. 2025;Vol16(9). (Impact Factor)
14. Epidemiology and impact of cholesteatoma. Wikipedia; 2025. (Wikipedia)
15. [Additional ENT studies 2020-2025 supporting CSOM hearing outcomes].
16. Kumar R, Sharma V, Singh A, et al. Audiological outcomes following tympanoplasty in mucosal chronic otitis media: a prospective cohort study.
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2021;73(3):356–361. (PMC)
17. Alzahrani M, Saliba I. Predictors of hearing improvement after canal wall up mastoidectomy with tympanoplasty.J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020;49:62–68. (BioMed Central)
18. Bhat V, De R, Saha R, et al. Evaluation of postoperative air–bone gap closure in chronic otitis media following ossiculoplasty.
Otolaryngol Pol. 2022;76(5):1–8. (PubMed)
19. El-Anwar MW, Nofal AA, Khazbak AO.Audiological results of cartilage tympanoplasty with intact canal wall mastoidectomy in CSOM.
Egypt J Otolaryngol. 2021;37:91–97. (SpringerOpen)
20. Hussain A, Iqbal K, Khan MI, et al.Hearing outcomes and prognostic indicators after type I and type III tympanoplasty.
Pak J Med Sci. 2023;39(2):512–517. (PMC)
21. Rohit R, Manjunath K, Prasad KC.Comparison of hearing gain following CWU mastoidectomy versus tympanoplasty alone in tubotympanic CSOM.
Int J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024;10(4):789–795. (IJORL)
22. Zhang Y, Liu P, Wang H, et al.Middle ear status, ossicular integrity, and postoperative hearing results in chronic otitis media.
Acta Otolaryngol. 2025;145(1):45–52. (Taylor & Francis).

