ANALYSIS OF TRACHEO BRONCHIAL FOREIGN BODY WITH RESPECT TO SEX AGE TYPE AND PRESENTATION
Main Article Content
Keywords
Tracheobronchial foreign body, aspiration, pediatric airway obstruction, rigid bronchoscopy, foreign body removal, children, respiratory distress, bronchial obstruction
Abstract
Background: Tracheobronchial foreign body aspiration is a life-threatening pediatric emergency that requires prompt diagnosis and management. It is most commonly seen in young children due to their tendency to explore objects orally and immature airway protective reflexes. Understanding the demographic profile, type of foreign body, and clinical presentation is essential for early recognition and improved outcomes.
Objective: To analyze tracheobronchial foreign body aspiration in 50 patients with respect to age, sex, type of foreign body, and clinical presentation.
Methods: This observational study was conducted in the Department of ENT, Head and Neck Surgery at Ayub teaching Hospital MTI, Abbottabad. A total of 50 patients diagnosed with tracheobronchial foreign body aspiration and confirmed by rigid bronchoscopy were included. Data regarding age, sex, type of foreign body, site of impaction, clinical features, duration of symptoms, radiological findings, and procedural outcomes were collected and analyzed using descriptive statistics.
Results: Out of 50 patients, a male predominance was observed with a male-to-female ratio of approximately 2:1. The most affected age group was 1–5 years, accounting for the majority of cases. Organic foreign bodies were most common (approximately 70–75%), with peanuts, seeds, and nuts being the leading objects, followed by inorganic materials such as plastic parts, beads, and metallic objects. The right main bronchus was the most frequent site of lodgment due to its anatomical orientation. The most common presenting symptoms were sudden onset cough (85–90%), choking episodes (70–75%), wheezing (60–65%), and respiratory distress (40–50%). Delayed presentation beyond 24–48 hours was associated with complications including pneumonia, atelectasis, and persistent fever. Rigid bronchoscopy achieved successful removal in the majority of cases with minimal complications and no mortality.
Conclusion: Tracheobronchial foreign body aspiration predominantly affects male children under five years of age, with organic materials being the most commonly aspirated objects. Sudden cough and choking remain key diagnostic clues. Early suspicion, prompt imaging, and timely rigid bronchoscopy are critical for reducing morbidity and preventing complications. Public education regarding child supervision and avoidance of small food items is essential for prevention.
References
2.Montana A, Salerno M, Feola A, Asmundo A, Di Nunno N, Casella F, Manno E, Colosimo F, Serra R, Di Mizio G. Risk management and recommendations for the prevention of fatalforeign body aspiration: four cases aged 1.5 to 3 years and mini-review of the literature. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020 Jul;17(13):4700.
3.Manetu WM, M’masi S, Recha CW. Diarrhea disease among children under 5 years of age: a global systematic review. Open Journal of Epidemiology. 2021 Jun 28;11(3):207-21.
AnalysisOfTracheoBronchialForeignBodyWithRespectToSexAgeTypeAndPresentationVol.29No.04(2022):JPTCP(5763-5770)Page|5770
4.Chandran A, Hyder AA, Peek-Asa C. The global burden of unintentional injuries and an agenda for progress. Epidemiologic reviews. 2010 Apr 1;32(1):110-20.
5.Boesch RP, Deboer EM. Aspiration. InKendig's Disorders of the Respiratory Tract in Children 2019 Jan 1 (pp. 1097-1105). Elsevier.
6.Boesch RP, Deboer EM. Aspiration. InKendig's Disorders of the Respiratory Tract in Children 2019 Jan 1 (pp. 1097-1105). Elsevier.
7.de Lima Alvarenga EH, Dall’Oglio GP, Murano EZ, Abrahão M. Continuum theory: presbyphagia to dysphagia? Functional assessment of swallowing in the elderly. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology. 2018 Feb;275(2):443-9.
8.Chouhan M, Sharma S. Tracheobronchial foreign bodies: the importance of timely intervention and appropriate collaboration. Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery. 2019 Oct;71(Suppl 1):972-5.
9.Montana A, Salerno M, Feola A, Asmundo A, Di Nunno N, Casella F, Manno E, Colosimo F, Serra R, Di Mizio G. Risk management and recommendations for the prevention of fatalforeign body aspiration:four cases aged 1.5 to 3 years and mini-review of the literature. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020 Jul;17(13):4700.
10.Gang W, Zhengxia P, Hongbo L, Yonggang L, Jiangtao D, Shengde W, Chun W. Diagnosis and treatment of tracheobronchial foreign bodies in 1024 children. Journal of pediatric surgery. 2012 Nov 1;47(11):2004-10.
11.Sarkar A, Murthy V. Foreign body aspiration: a review of current strategies for management. Shanghai Chest. 2021 Jul 10;5.
12.Michael Jaeger J, Titus BJ, Blank RS. Essential anatomy and physiology of the respiratory system and the pulmonary circulation. InPrinciples and practice of anesthesia for thoracic surgery 2019 Jan 5 (pp. 65-92). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
13.Johnson K, Linnaus M, Notrica D. Airway foreign bodies in pediatric patients: anatomic location of foreign body affects complications and outcomes. Pediatric surgery international. 2017 Jan;33(1):59-64.
14.BatraH, Yarmus L. Indications and complications of rigid bronchoscopy. Expert review of respiratory medicine. 2018 Jun 3;12(6):509-20.
15.Acharya K. Rigid bronchoscopy in airway foreign bodies: value of the clinical and radiological signs. International archives of otorhinolaryngology. 2016 Jul;20(03):196-201.
Article Sidebar
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
All articles published in JPTCP are licensed under Copyright Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
