DIAGNOSTIC UTILITY OF PRE TREATMENT NLR,PLR & MPV/ PC IN CERVICAL CANCER STAGING
Main Article Content
Keywords
Cervical cancer, Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), Mean platelet volume (MPV), Platelet count, Hematologic biomarkerCervical cancer, Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), Mean platelet volume (MPV), Platelet count, Hematologic biomarkers, Cancer Staging, Inflammatory markers.
Abstract
Background:Cervical cancer remains a significant public health issue, especially in developing countries. Early-stage identification is essential for initiating timely treatment and improving patient outcomes. Recent evidence suggests that systemic inflammatory markers such as the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and mean platelet volume to platelet count ratio (MPV/PC) may aid in predicting cancer progression.
Objective:To evaluate the diagnostic utility of pretreatment NLR, PLR, and MPV/PC ratios in differentiating early (Stage I–II) and late (Stage III–IV) cervical cancer patients.
Methods:A prospective study was conducted on 100 newly diagnosed, treatment-naïve cervical cancer patients. NLR, PLR, and MPV/PC ratios were calculated using pretreatment complete blood counts. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was employed to determine cut-off values. Statistical significance was assessed using t-tests and chi-square tests, with p-values <0.05 considered significant.
Results:NLR (cutoff 4): Sensitivity 64.5%, Specificity 78.3%, p ˂0.0001
PLR (cutoff 150): Sensitivity 74.2%, Specificity 71%, p˂0.0001
MPV/PC (cutoff 4.8): Sensitivity 58.1%, Specificity 56.5%, p 0.134
PLR demonstrated the highest diagnostic sensitivity and strongest statistical association with late-stage disease, followed by NLR. MPV/PC showed a lower sensitivity and lacked statistical significance.
Conclusion:Pretreatment inflammatory markers, particularly PLR and NLR, are significantly associated with the stage of cervical cancer and can serve as cost-effective, non-invasive tools for clinical risk stratification. Incorporating these parameters into routine pre-treatment evaluation may assist in early-stage identification and individualized treatment planning.
References
2. Beas-Lozano EL, Contreras S, Mac Donald-Jaramillo MA, Frayde-Aguilar C, CarrilloVidales J, Jaime-Casas S, Martinez-Cannon BA. Current management of cervical cancer in women living with HIV. Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology. 2024 Sep 24:104519.
3. Hull R, Mbele M, Makhafola T, Hicks C, Wang SM, Reis RM, Mehrotra R, MkhizeKwitshana Z, Kibiki G, Bates DO, Dlamini Z. Cervical cancer in low and middle-income countries. Oncol Lett. 2020 Sep;20(3):2058-2074.
4. Joo J, Shin HJ, Park B, et al. Integration pattern of human papillomavirus is a strong prognostic factor for disease-free survival after radiation therapy in cervical cancer patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2017;98:654–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [GoogleScholar]
5. Chen L, Zhang F, Sheng XG, et al. Peripheral platelet/lymphocyte ratio predicts lymph node metastasis and acts as a superior prognostic factor for cervical cancer when combined with neutrophil: lymphocyte. Medicine (Baltimore) 2016;95:e4381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
6. Mao S, Dong J, Li S, et al. Prognostic significance of number of nodes removed in patients with node-negative early cervical cancer. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2016;42:1317–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
7. Ma JY, Ke LC, Liu Q. The pretreatment platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts clinical outcomes in patients with cervical cancer: A meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Oct;97(43):e12897. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000012897. PMID: 30412089; PMCID: PMC6221620.
8. Grivennikov SI, Greten FR, Karin M. Immunity, inflammation, and cancer. Cell.2010;140:883–9. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.01.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
9. Grivennikov SI, Greten FR, Karin M. Immunity, inflammation, and cancer. Cell.2010;140:883–9. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.01.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
10. Prabawa IPY, Bhargah A, Liwang F, Tandio DA, Tandio AL, Lestari AAW, Budiana NG, Manuaba IBAP. Pretreatment Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and Platelet-to- Lymphocyte Ratio (PLR) as a Predictive Value of Hematological Markers in Cervical Cancer. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2019 Mar 26;20(3):863-868. doi: 10.31557/ APJCP.2019.20.3.863. PMID: 30912405; PMCID: PMC6825764
11. Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: The next generation. Cell. 2011;144:646–74. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
12. Canna K, McArdle PA, McMillan DC, et al. The relationship between tumour Tlymphocyte infiltration, the systemic inflammatory response and survival in patients undergoing curative resection for colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer. 2005;92:651–4. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
13. Del Prete A, Allavena P, Santoro G, et al. Molecular pathways in cancer-related inflammation. Biochemia Medica 2011; 21:264–275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
14. Mantovani A, Allavena P, Sica A, et al. Cancer-related inflammation. Nature 2008; 454:436–444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
15. Mizunuma M, Yokoyama Y, Futagami M, et al. The pretreatment neutrophil-tolymphocyte ratio predicts therapeutic response to radiation therapy and concurrent chemoradiation therapy in uterine cervical cancer. Int J ClinOncol 2015; 20:989–996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
16. Feng JF, Huang Y, Liu JS. Combination of neutrophil lymphocyte ratio and platelet lymphocyte ratio is a useful predictor of postoperative survival in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. OncoTargets Ther 2013; 6:1605–1612. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
17. Chen L, Zhang F, Sheng XG, Zhang SQ, Chen YT, Liu BW. Peripheral platelet/ lymphocyte ratio predicts lymph node metastasis and acts as a superior prognostic factor for cervical cancer when combined with neutrophil: Lymphocyte. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Aug;95(32):e4381. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000004381. PMID: 27512849; PMCID: PMC4985304.
18. Alegbeleye JO, John OC. A multicentre review of gynaecological cancer services in the South-South and South-East regions of Nigeria. JMSCR. 2023;11:1-7.
19. Nair LM, Babu A, KM JK, Kumar A, Mathews S, Joseph J, James FV. Prognostic Significance of Pre-treatment Serum Inflammatory Biomarkers on Survival in Patients with Carcinoma Cervix Treated by Radical Radiotherapy or Chemo-radiation. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Care. 2021 Oct 27;6(4):417-23.
20. Cheng M, Li G, Liu Z, Yang Q, Jiang Y. Pretreatment Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and Lactate Dehydrogenase Predict the Prognosis of Metastatic Cervical Cancer Treated with Combination Immunotherapy. J Oncol. 2022 Oct 18;2022:1828473.
21. Deng Q, Hou Y, Zhang X, Zan H. A systematic review of the predictive value of radiomics for nasopharyngeal carcinoma prognosis. Medicine. 2024 Aug 30;103(35):e39302.
22. 22.Wang J, Zhou X, Liu Y, Li Z, Li X. Prognostic significance of neutrophil-tolymphocyte ratio in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2017Apr 25;12(4):e0176008.

