MORPHOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF THE HUMAN MANDIBLE AND ITS CLINICAL RELEVANCE IN ORTHODONTIC DIAGNOSIS

Main Article Content

Preeti Panduranrao Pawde
Dr Manish Gupta
Dr Rajendra Singh

Keywords

Mandible, Morphometric analysis, Facial skeleton, Orthodontic diagnosis, Forensic anthropology

Abstract

Background:
The mandible is the largest and strongest bone of the facial skeleton and plays a crucial role in mastication, speech, and maintenance of facial symmetry. Morphometric analysis of the mandible is important in orthodontic diagnosis, forensic identification, and craniofacial research due to significant anatomical variation among individuals.


Aim:
To evaluate various morphometric parameters of the human mandible and assess their clinical relevance in orthodontic diagnosis.


Materials and Methods: This observational cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Anatomy, Index Medical College, Indore, India. A total of 290 dry adult human mandibles were examined, including 166 male and 124 female specimens. Various morphometric parameters were measured, including gonial angle, bigonial width, bicondylar breadth, ramus breadth, mandibular length, lower jaw length, coronoid height, body height, and symphyseal height. Statistical analysis was performed using an independent t-test, and p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.


Results:
The study revealed significant sexual dimorphism in most mandibular parameters. The gonial angle was significantly greater in females (137.99 ± 6.29°) than in males (129.63 ± 6.92°, p < 0.001). In contrast, bigonial width, bicondylar breadth, ramus breadth, mandibular length, coronoid height, body height, and symphyseal height were significantly greater in male mandibles compared to female mandibles (p < 0.001). These findings indicate that male mandibles are generally larger and more robust than female mandibles.


Conclusion:
The present study demonstrates marked sexual dimorphism in several mandibular morphometric parameters. These measurements have important applications in orthodontic diagnosis, forensic anthropology, and craniofacial surgery, as variations in mandibular dimensions influence facial profile, occlusion, and mandibular growth patterns. The morphometric data obtained may serve as useful reference values for clinical and anthropological studies.

Abstract 0 | pdf Downloads 0

References

1. Standring S. Gray’s Anatomy: The Anatomical Basis of Clinical Practice. 41st ed. Elsevier; 2016.
2. Moore KL, Dalley AF, Agur AMR. Clinically Oriented Anatomy. 8th ed. Wolters Kluwer; 2018.
3. White SC, Pharoah MJ. Oral Radiology: Principles and Interpretation. 8th ed. Elsevier; 2019.
4. Proffit WR, Fields HW, Sarver DM. Contemporary Orthodontics. 6th ed. Elsevier; 2019.
5. Krogman WM, İşcan MY. The Human Skeleton in Forensic Medicine. 2nd ed. Charles C Thomas, 1986.
6. Sharma M, Gorea RK, Gorea A, Abuderman A. A morphometric study of the human mandible for sex determination. J Punjab Acad Forensic Med Toxicol. 2016;16(1):10–14.
7. Indira AP, Markande A, David MP. Mandibular ramus: an indicator for sex determination – a digital radiographic study. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2012;4(2):58–62.
8. Franklin D, O’Higgins P, Oxnard CE, Dadour I. Determination of sex in South African blacks by discriminant function analysis of mandibular linear dimensions. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2008;4(3):175–181.
9. Saini V, Srivastava R, Rai RK, Shamal SN, Singh TB, Tripathi SK. Mandibular ramus: an indicator for sex in fragmentary mandible. J Forensic Sci. 2011;56(S1):S13–S16.
10. Giles E. Sex determination by discriminant function analysis of the mandible. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1964;22:129–135.
11. Vinay G, Mangala Gowri SR, Anbalagan J. Sex determination of human mandible using metrical parameters. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013;7(12):2671–2673.
12. Humphrey LT, Dean MC, Stringer CB. Morphological variation in great ape and modern human mandibles. J Anat. 1999;195(Pt 4):491–513.