EFFICACY OF CLONIDINE VERSUS DEXMEDETOMIDINE AS ADJUVANTS TO 0.25% LEVOBUPIVACAINE IN ULTRASOUND GUIDED TRANSVERSALIS FASCIAL PLANE BLOCK FOR LOWER SEGMENT CAESAREAN SECTION.

Main Article Content

Dr. N.Harshitha
Dr.G.Chaithanya kumar
Dr. K.Krishna Chaithanya
Dr.K.Brindha,M.D

Keywords

Lower segment cesarian section, Transversalis fascial plane block, clonidine, dexmedetomidine, levobupivacaine

Abstract

:  Lower segment caesarean section [LSCS] is associated with significant post-operative pain which may delay recovery and adversely affect maternal wellbeing. Ultrasound guided transversalis fascial plane block [TFPB] is an effective component of multimodal analgesia within enhanced recovery after surgery [ERAS] protocols.


Aim: To compare the efficacy of clonidine versus dexmedetomidine as adjuvants to 0.25% levobupivacaine in TFPB for postoperative analgesia following LSCS.


Methods: This prospective, randomized, double-blinded controlled clinical study included 60 parturients undergoing LSCS, allocated into two groups [n=30 each]. Group TFP-C received 0.5 mcg/kg clonidine and Group TFP-D received 0.5 mcg/kg dexmedetomidine as adjuvants to 0.25 % levobupivacaine ‘


Primary outcomes were time for first rescue analgesia and number of rescue analgesic doses. Secondary outcomes included Visual analogue scale [VAS] scores, Bruggeman comfort scale [B.C.S] scores, hemodynamic parameters and adverse effects.


Results: The dexmedetomidine   group [Group- TFP-D] significantly prolonged the time to first rescue analgesia [6.05 + 1.00 vs 4.10 + 0.85 hours; p< 0.001] and reduced the number of rescue analgesic doses [1.60 + 0.60 vs 2.30 + 0.70; p=0.001]. VAS scores were significantly lower and comfort scores were higher in the Group TFP-D  [p<0.05]. Hemodynamic parameters were better controlled  without significant increase in adverse effects.


Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine is a superior adjuvant to levobupivacaine compared to clonidine in TFPB for LSCS, providing prolonged analgesia, improved patient comfort, and stable hemodynamics with a comparable safety profile.

Abstract 0 | Pdf Downloads 0

References

1. Mishriky BM, George RB, Habib AS. Transversus abdominis plane block for analgesia after Cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie. 2012 Aug;59(8):766-78.
2. Bollag L, Lim G, Sultan P, Habib AS, Landau R, Zakowski M, Tiouririne M, Bhambhani S, Carvalho B. Society for obstetric anesthesia and perinatology: consensus statement and recommendations for enhanced recovery after cesarean. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 2021 May 1;132(5):1362-77.
3. Tulgar S, Ahıskalıoğlu A, Kilicaslan A, Çiftçi B, Dost B, Aydın ME, Gürkan Y. Fascial plane blocks as the main anesthetic method: A narrative review. Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia. 2025 Apr 1;19(2):198-208.
4. Nair A, Dudhedia U, Rangaiah M, Borkar N. Ultrasound-guided transversalis fascia plane block for postoperative analgesia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Indian Journal of Anaesthesia. 2023 Apr 1;67(4):331-42.
5. Arun N, Avinash R, Choudhary A. Intraoperative thoracic interfascial plane block with levobupivacaine versus levobupivacaine with dexmedetomidine for postoperative analgesia after modified radical mastectomy: A randomised controlled double-blinded trial. Indian Journal of Anaesthesia. 2024 Aug 1;68(8):686-92.
6. Smith H, Elliott J. Alpha2 receptors and agonists in pain management. Current opinion in Anesthesiology. 2001 Oct 1;14(5):513-8.
7. Abdallah FW, Halpern SH, Margarido CB. Transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative analgesia after Caesarean delivery performed under spinal anaesthesia? A systematic review and meta-analysis. British journal of anaesthesia. 2012 Nov 1;109(5):679-87.
8. Ituk U, Habib AS. Enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery. F1000Research. 2018 Apr 27;7:F1000-aculty.
9. Kamibayashi T, Maze M, Weiskopf RB, Weiskopf RB, Todd MM. Clinical uses of α2-adrenergic agonists. Anesthesiology. 2000 Nov 1;93(5):1345-9.
10. Blanco R. 271. Tap block under ultrasound guidance: the description of a “no pops” technique.
11. Hussain N, Grzywacz VP, Ferreri CA, Atrey A, Banfield L, Shaparin N, Vydyanathan A. Investigating the efficacy of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to local anesthesia in brachial plexus block: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 18 randomized controlled trials. Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine. 2017 Mar 1;42(2):184-96.
12. Nazir O, Bhat AH, Yatoo H, Kumar A. Comparison of clonidine and dexmedetomidine as adjuvants for ropivacaine in ultrasound guided transversus abdominis plane block for post caesarean analgesia. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology.;11(9):2412.
13. Brummett CM, Norat MA, Palmisano JM, Lydic R. Perineural administration of dexmedetomidine in combination with bupivacaine enhances sensory and motor blockade in sciatic nerve block without inducing neurotoxicity in the rat. Anesthesiology. 2008 Sep;109(3):502.
14. Gupta B, Gupta A, Verma RK, Shah P. Comparative study of dexmedetomidine and clonidine as an adjunct to levobupivacaine in transversus abdominis plane block in patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy: a randomized control study. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2019 Oct 1;8(10):3992
15. Bajpai V, Patel TK, Dwivedi P, Bajpai A, Gupta A, Gangwar P, Singh Y, Agarwal R, Kishore S. Dexmedetomidine versus clonidine as an adjuvant to local anaesthetic in brachial plexus blocks: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (English Edition). 2023 Sep 1;73(5):665-75.