RELATIVE ASSESSMENT AND COMPARISON OF MARGINAL ADAPTATION AND TUBULAR PENETRATION WITH VARIOUS OBTURATING MATERIALS: AN OBSERVATIONAL SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPIC STUDY

Main Article Content

Dr. Rakhi Singh
Dr.Dharmendra Kumar Sinha
Dr. Rakhi Kumari
Dr Vishal
Dr. Tanya Khaitan

Keywords

MARGINAL ADAPTATION, OBTURATING MATERIALS, ROOT CANAL TREATMENT, SCANNING MICROSCOPY, TEETH.

Abstract

prevention of persistent infection and re-infections of root canal is an ideal treatment usually achieved by counter-balancing the bacterial invasions, destruction of bacterial biofilms, thorough debridement and complete sealing of the root canal anatomy. Among all the most widely accepted and successful anticipations in a root canal therapy is a perfect hermetic three dimensional seal. Our study thus


AIMED to evaluate and compare the accuracy of marginal adaptation and tubular penetration of three different sealers with respect to the cervical, middle and apical third of the root canal.
MATERIAL AND METHODOLOGY: 45 single rooted extracted teeth were obtained from the oral surgery department and stored in plastic vials containing artificial saliva. The teeth were then randomly divided into three groups with 15 specimens in each group. Root canal therapies were completed according to the single visit protocol and the canal were eventually filled using a specific sealer. In Group A, bio-root RCS, in Group B, AH plus and in Group C, Sealapex sealers were with single cone technique. The specimens were then sectioned at apical, middle and cervical third and evaluated using electron microscopy.


RESULTS: the data collected was analyzed statistically using means and inter and intragroup comparisons were done using two way ANOVA test. On evaluating the results, statistically significant results were obtained among all the three groups.
CONCLUSION: the results of our study concluded that experience, proper root canal preparations and genuine obturation techniques can provide an absolute marginal adaptability irrespective of the sealers used.

Abstract 0 | pdf Downloads 0

References

1. Ali G S, Mulay S, Palekar A, Sejpal D, Joshi A, Gufran H Prevalence of and factors affecting post-obturation pain following single visit root canal treatment in Indian population: A prospective, randomized clinical trial Contempclindent. July 17, 2013.
2. Walton R, Fouad A. Endodontic interappointment flare-ups: A prospective study of incidence and related factors. J Endod 1992;18:172-7.
3. M. Haapasalo, T. Udnaes, and U. Endal, “Persistent, recurrent, and acquired infection of the root canal system post-treatment,” Endodontic Topics, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 29–56, 2003.
4. R. M. Love and H. F. Jenkinson, “Invasion of dentinal tubules by oral bacteria,” Critical Reviews in Oral Biology and Medicine, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 171–183, 2002.
5. S. Muliyar, KA. Shameem, RP. Thankachan, PG. Francis, CS. Jayapalan, and KA. Hafiz, “Microleakage in endodontics,” Journal of International Oral Health, pp. 99–104, 2014.
6. Y. K. Kim, S. Grandini, J. M. Ames et al., “Critical review on methacrylate resin–based root canal sealers,” Journal of Endodontics, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 383–399, 2010.
7. Gesi, O. Raffaelli, C. Goracci, D. H. Pashley, F. R. Tay, and M. Ferrari, “Interfacial strength of Resilon and gutta-percha to intraradicular dentin,” Journal of Endodontics, vol. 31, no. 11, pp. 809–813, 2005.
8. U. Sj¨ogren,D. Figdor, S. Persson, and G. Sundqvist, “Influence of infection at the time of root filling on the outcome of endodontic treatment of teeth with apical periodontitis,” International Endodontic Journal, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 297–306, 1997.
9. Heling and N. P. Chandler, “The antimicrobial effect within dentinal tubules of four root canal sealers,” Journal of Endodontics, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 257–259, 1996.
10. Pius A, Mathew J, et al. Evaluation and Comparison of the Marginal Adaptation of an Epoxy, Calcium Hydroxide-based, and Bioceramic-based Root Canal Sealer to Root Dentin by SEM Analysis: An In Vitro Study. Cons Dent Endod J 2019;4(1):6–13.
11. Chaturvedi S, Ahuja S, Agrawal GN, Khade A, Dhewale AM, Singh R. Comparison of marginal adaptation of epoxy resin based sealer (AH Plus) and MTA based sealer (MTA Fillapex) at dentin sealer interface at apical one third of the root canals. European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine. 2021 Apr 6;7(11):2020.
12. Sousa-Neto MD, Passarinho-Neto JG, Carvalho-Junior JR, Cruz-Filho AM, Pecora JD, Saquy PC. Evaluation of the effect of EDTA, EGTA and CDTA on dentin adhesiveness and microleakage with different root canal sealers. Braz. Dent. J. 2002;13: 123–128.
13. Kossev D, Stefanov V. Ceramics-based sealers as new alternative to currently used endodontic sealers. Roots 2009;1:42–48.
14. Jain S, Adhikari HD. Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of marginal adaptation of AH-plus, GuttaFlow, and RealSeal at apical one-third of root canals – Part I: Dentin-sealer interface. J Conserv Dent 2018;21:85-9.
15. Savariz A, González-Rodríguez MP, et al. Long-term sealing ability of GuttaFlow vs Ah Plus using different obturation techniques. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2010 Nov 1;15(6):e936–e941. DOI: 10.4317/ medoral.15.e936.
16. Chen H, Zhao X, Qiu Y, Xu D, Cui L, Wu B. The tubular penetration depth and adaption of four sealers: a scanning electron microscopic study. BioMed Research International. 2017 Dec 31;2017.
17. Lee JK, Kwak SW, Ha JH, Lee W, Kim HC. Physicochemical properties of epoxy resin-based and bioceramic-based root canal sealers. Bioinorg Chem Appl 2017;2017:2582849.
18. Borges RP, Sousa-Neto MD, Versiani MA, Rached-Júnior FA, De-Deus G, Miranda CE, et al. Changes in thesurface of four calcium silicate-containing endodontic materials and an epoxy resin-based sealer after a solubilitytest. Int Endod J 2012;45:419-28.
19. Rouhani A, Ghoddusi J, Naghavi N, Ebadzadeh Z, Akbari M. The sealing ability of resilon and gutta percha in severely curved root canals: An in vitro study. J Dent (Tehran) 2013;10:141 6.

Most read articles by the same author(s)