OPTIMIZING POSTOPERATIVE WOUND CARE: NEGATIVE PRESSURE WOUND THERAPY VERSUS CONVENTIONAL DRESSING IN ABDOMINAL SURGERY

Main Article Content

Dr Aamna Nazir
Dr Atif Khan
Dr Qasim Ali
Dr Hira Waris
Dr Muhammad Waqas Raza

Keywords

Negative pressure wound therapy; Surgical site infection; Conventional wound dressing; Abdominal surgery; Wound healing.

Abstract

Background: Surgical site infections remain a frequent postoperative complication following abdominal surgery and are associated with delayed wound healing, prolonged hospital stay, and increased healthcare costs. Conventional saline-soaked gauze dressing has traditionally been used for wound management, but negative pressure wound therapy has emerged as a promising alternative that may enhance wound healing by reducing edema, promoting granulation tissue formation, and decreasing bacterial burden.


Methods: This randomized controlled trial was conducted in Surgical Unit IV, SIMS and Services Hospital Lahore, over a six-month period from 31 December 2020 to 30 June 2021. A total of 100 patients aged 18 to 60 years who developed surgical site infection following elective abdominal surgery with a midline incision were enrolled. Patients were randomized into two equal groups using a random access table: Group A received negative pressure wound therapy, while Group B received conventional saline-soaked sterile gauze dressing. The primary outcome was wound healing efficacy at the seventh postoperative day, defined as absence of surgical site infection and presence of healthy granulation tissue. Data were analysed using SPSS version 21, and results were expressed as frequencies, percentages, means, and standard deviations.


Results: The mean age of participants was 48.27 ± 6.99 years, with 60 percent of patients aged 50 years or younger. Male patients constituted 71 percent of the study population. Negative pressure wound therapy was effective in achieving wound healing by day seven in 42 patients (84 percent), while only 8 patients (16 percent) required prolonged dressing. In contrast, conventional dressing resulted in successful wound healing in 33 patients (66 percent), whereas 17 patients (34 percent) required extended wound care. Overall, negative pressure wound therapy demonstrated superior efficacy compared to conventional wound dressing.


Conclusion: Negative pressure wound therapy is more effective than conventional saline gauze dressing for the management of surgical site infections following abdominal surgery, leading to improved wound healing outcomes.


 

Abstract 0 | Pdf Downloads 0

References

1. Sánchez-Rodríguez M, Pastor C, Tejedor P. Surgical site infection. Br J Surg. 2025;112(10):znaf213.
2. Bhattacharyya S, Kumar M, Singh S, Sengupta A, Sarfraz A, Kumar A, et al. Surgical site infections: a review [Internet]. IP Int J Med Microbiol Trop Dis. 2021;7(3):124-128.
3. Garale MN, Rewatkar AK, Moktali AV, Dalvi A. Incidence and risk factors for surgical site infections following emergency laparotomies: a prospective observational study. Cureus. 2025;17(3).
4. Purwar V. Surgical site infections following emergency versus planned abdominal surgeries: an observational study in a tertiary care hospital in India. Eur J Cardiovasc Med. 2025;15:396-403.
5. Bucataru A, Balasoiu M, Ghenea AE, Zlatian OM, Vulcanescu DD, Horhat FG, et al. Factors contributing to surgical site infections: a comprehensive systematic review of etiology and risk factors. Clin Pract. 2023;14(1):52-68.
6. Megahed HA, Taki-Eldin A, Abdel-Monem AM, Ibrahim MK, Aziz AA, Farg MZ, et al. Risk factors for surgical site infections in elective and emergency surgeries: a prospective cohort study. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2025;39:55.
7. Marzoug OA, Anees A, Malik EM. Assessment of risk factors associated with surgical site infection following abdominal surgery: a systematic review. BMJ Surg Interv Health Technol. 2023;5(1):e000182.
8. Walz JM, Paterson CA, Seligowski JM, Heard SO. Surgical site infection following bowel surgery: a retrospective analysis of 1446 patients. Arch Surg. 2006;141(10):1014-1018.
9. Marcolina M, Williams ZJ, Hendrickson D, Pezzanite LM. Evaluation of sterility of saline formulations manufactured for wound care in veterinary practice. Vet Sci. 2025;12(5):431.
10. Poteet SJ, Schulz SA, Povoski SP, Chao AH. Negative pressure wound therapy: device design, indications, and the evidence supporting its use. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2021;18(2):151-160.
11. Elbanna OH, Eldine AS, Sayed AM, Mousa AK. The efficacy and safety of different negative-pressure wound therapy gradients on flaps outcomes. Updates Surg. 2025:1-9.
12. Agarwal A. Evolution of negative pressure wound therapy in orthopaedic trauma. J Orthop Trauma. 2022;36(Suppl 1):S1-S5.
13. De Vries FE, Atema JJ, Lapid O, Obdeijn MC, Boermeester MA. Closed incision prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy in patients undergoing major complex abdominal wall repair. Hernia. 2017;21(4):583-589.
14. Condé-Green A, Chung TL, Holton LH, Hui-Chou HG, Zhu Y, Wang H, et al. Incisional negative-pressure wound therapy versus conventional dressings following abdominal wall reconstruction: a comparative study. Ann Plast Surg. 2013;71(4):394-397.
15. Cirocchi R, Birindelli A, Biffl WL, Mutafchiyski V, Popivanov G, Chiara O, et al. Effectiveness of negative pressure wound therapy in patients treated with open abdomen technique: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016;81(3):575-584.
16. Ramzan M, Rehman A, Waheed L, Noreen S, Imran A, Akhtar A. Comparison of wound healing outcomes with negative pressure wound therapy versus conventional dressing in postoperative abdominal surgeries: a multicentre study. Res Med Sci Rev. 2025;3(7):1943-1947.
17. Ashraf S, Shahwaiz M, Khaliq T. Effectiveness of prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy in preventing post-surgical wound infection of abdominal wounds compared to conventional dressing: a randomized controlled trial. Ann PIMS Shaheed Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto Med Univ. 2024;20(1):92-97.
18. Anestiadou E, Stamiris S, Ioannidis O, Symeonidis S, Bitsianis S, Bougioukas K, et al. Comparison of negative pressure wound therapy systems and conventional non-pressure dressings on surgical site infection rate after stoma reversal: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Med. 2025;14:1654.
19. Ebeid I, Ebeid A, Shalaby A, Noureldeen IM, Essa A, Elmenawi KA. Negative pressure wound therapy for prevention of surgical site infections in orthopedic and trauma surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Orthop Traumatol. 2025;26(1):75.
20. Seidel D, Diedrich S, Herrle F, Thielemann H, Marusch F, Schirren R, et al. Negative pressure wound therapy versus conventional wound treatment in subcutaneous abdominal wound healing impairment: the SAWHI randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg. 2020;155(6):536.