“ANTIBIOTIC SENSITIVITY PATTERNS IN ENTERIC FEVER PT E POSITIVE BLOOD CULTURE”
Main Article Content
Keywords
Enteric fever; Salmonella Typhi; Salmonella Paratyphi; Blood culture; Antibiotic susceptibility; Antimicrobial resistance; Ceftriaxone; Azithromycin; Department of Medicine, Qazi Hussain Ahmed Medical Complex Nowshera, Pakistan.
Abstract
Background: Enteric fever is one of the key health problems facing Pakistan, and the increasing antimicrobial resistance has diminished the efficacy of some of the widely used antibiotic drugs. Empirical therapy and antibiotic stewardship are required to be guided by local, culture-based antibiograms.
Objective: To learn the sensitivity pattern of the antibiotic Salmonella Typhi and Salmonella Paratyphi to positive blood cultures of enteric fever patients in Department of Medicine, Qazi Hussain Ahmed Medical Complex Nowshera.
Methods: The study was a descriptive cross-sectional study in the Department of Medicine, Qazi Hussain Ahmed Medical Complex Nowshera, between May, 2025 and October, 2025. Standard microbiological procedures were applied to blood cultures of clinically suspected cases of enteric fevers. Biochemical tests and serotyping were used to identify isolates as S. Typhi or S. Paratyphi. The Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion test on Mueller-Hinton agar was used to perform the antimicrobial susceptibility test, and the results were interpreted based on CLSI 2025 breakpoints of the antibiotics tested.
Results: Out of 200 cases which had been culture-confirmed, S. Typhi was identified in 152 (76.0%), S. Paratyphi A was identified in 36 (18.0%), and S. Paratyphi B was identified in 12 (6.0%). Ampicillin (61.9% in S. Typhi) and chloramphenicol (57.2%) were seen to be the least susceptible, and ciprofloxacin (50.0% sensitive) was the least susceptible. Now, ceftriaxone (84.2%), cefixime (86.8%), and azithromycin (90.8%) were kept at high sensitivity. Meropenem was still very effective (98.7% sensitive). The same tendencies were observed in the S. Paratyphi isolates.
Conclusion: The first-line agents and fluoroquinolones used in the traditional approach were not very reliable, whereas the third-generation cephalosporins and azithromycin were still effective. Regular updates of institution-specific antibiograms and frequent culture-based recommendations are essential to maximize treatment, as well as prevent the further increase of resistance.
References
2. Sultana N, Karim F, Rahman MK. Platelet to Lymphocyte Ratio as a New Inflammation Marker for the Preterm PROM. Sch Int J Obstet Gynec. 2023;6(10):394–399.
3. Barman TK, Uddin I, Haque MA, Haque MM, Paul N. Study on Isolation of Organism and Antibiotic Sensitivity Pattern in Blood Culture of Enteric Fever Patients in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Bangladesh. Mugda Medical College Journal. 2024;7(2):108–113.
4. Al Masum A, Sarker ZM, Ahmed T, Khatun N, Islam MT. Antimicrobial sensitivity pattern of commonly used antibiotics among adult enteric fever patients. Journal of Preventive and Social Medicine. 2022;41(2):43–49.
5. Srinivasan M, Sindhu KN, Ramanujam K, Ramasamy RK, Subramaniam S, Ganesan SK, Vajja S, David AS, Lankala P, Rose W, Moses PD. Factors predicting blood culture positivity in children with enteric fever. The Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2021;224(Suppl 5):S484–S493.
6. Khaliq A, ur Rehman SK, Shah SM. Antibiotics Sensitivity Patterns of Enteric Fever in a Tertiary Care Hospital. Medical Forum Monthly. 2024;35(3).
7. Maharjan A, Dhungel B, Bastola A, Thapa Shrestha U, Adhikari N, Banjara MR, Lekhak B, Ghimire P, Rijal KR. Antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of Salmonella spp. isolated from enteric fever patients in Nepal. Infectious Disease Reports. 2021;13(2):388–400.
8. Anjum M, Soomro S, Kulsoom S, Bibil S, Asim S, Riaz M. Clinical spectrum, laboratory profile and antibiotic susceptibility pattern of children with enteric fever at a tertiary care hospital of Karachi. Journal of Islamic International Medical College (JIIMC). 2021;16(1):4–9.
9. Roy S, Ahmed I, Saha PC, Uddin BM, Ahmed MU, Yusuf MA. Blood Culture and Widal Test as Diagnostic Tools for Enteric Fever with Antibiogram in a Tertiary Care Centre at Dhaka in Bangladesh. Asian Journal of Medicine and Health. 2021;19(9):97–106.
10. Manandhar R, Raghubanshi BR, Neupane S, Lama R. Prevalence of enteric fever pathogens isolated from blood culture at a tertiary care centre. JNMA: Journal of the Nepal Medical Association. 2021;59(235):256–260.
11. Hamdulay K, Rawekar R, Tayade A, Kumar S, Acharya S, Hamdulay DK Jr. Evolving epidemiology and antibiotic resistance in enteric fever: a comprehensive review. Cureus. 2024;16(6).
12. Chakraborty P, Mazumdar S, Mondal S, Choudhury S. Study on clinical profile and antibiotic sensitivity pattern of enteric fever patients in a tertiary care hospital of East India. Asian Journal of Medical Sciences. 2022;13(6):108–112.
13. Chatterji S, Sharma P, Kaur A, Kalyanasundaram D, Biswas A, Wig N, Kapil A. A study on the clinical spectrum, prescription pattern and diagnosis of enteric fever in a tertiary care hospital of North India. International Journal of Community Medicine and Public Health. 2022;9(6):2633–2638.
14. Ullah H, Razzaq A, Ahmad AM, Rehman R, Ateeq S, Aziz A. A study on the clinical profile, blood profile and culture sensitivity pattern of Salmonella Typhi in paediatric patients. Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal. 2022;72(4):1241–1246.
15. Neupane DP, Dulal HP, Song J. Enteric fever diagnosis: current challenges and future directions. Pathogens. 2021;10(4):410.
16. Shah AK. Diagnosis of Enteric Fever. Pediatric Infectious Disease. 2021;3(4):165–169.
17. Ray B, Raha A. Typhoid and enteric fevers in intensive care unit. Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine. 2021;25(Suppl 2):S144–S149.
18. Diwaker A, Tiwari A, Jain S, Rupali KA, Ram J, Singh S, Kishore D. Enteric fever and the diagnostic tools: defining the accuracy. Frontiers in Bacteriology. 2024;3:1332180.

