EVALUATING THE FEASIBILITY OF INJECTABLE DEPOT MEDROXYPROGESTERONE ACETATE AS CONTRACEPTION IN A TERTIARY CARE
Main Article Content
Keywords
Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate; Injectable contraception; Feasibility study; Menstrual irregularities; Continuation rate; Family planning
Abstract
Background: Injectable depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) is a long-acting, reversible, progestin-only contraceptive that offers an effective spacing option for women seeking a user-independent method. Its feasibility in routine clinical settings depends on acceptance, continuation, safety, and user satisfaction.
Objectives: To evaluate the feasibility of injectable DMPA as a contraceptive method in terms of acceptance, continuation, side effects, and overall safety among women attending a tertiary care center.
Methods: A Prospective and retrospective observational study was conducted at the School of Medical Sciences and Research, Sharda University, from January 2024 to December 2025. A total of 100 women aged 18–45 years opting for injectable contraception were enrolled. Participants received depot medroxyprogesterone acetate and were followed up at scheduled intervals. Data on demographic characteristics, continuation rates, menstrual pattern changes, adverse effects, and weight changes were collected. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 27.0 and GraphPad Prism version 5. Descriptive statistics were used, and appropriate inferential tests were applied, with a p-value ≤ 0.05 considered statistically significant.
Results: All participants accepted DMPA at initiation. Continuation rates were 86% at 3 months and 72% at 6 months. Menstrual irregularities were the most common side effects, with amenorrhea observed in 39% and irregular bleeding in 40% of participants at 6 months (p < 0.001). A modest but statistically significant increase in mean body weight was noted (p = 0.032). No serious adverse events were reported. Younger women demonstrated significantly higher continuation rates compared to older women.
Conclusion: Injectable DMPA is a feasible, safe, and acceptable contraceptive method with satisfactory continuation rates. Adequate counseling and follow-up are essential to optimize adherence and user satisfaction.
References
2. Dragoman MV, Seuc AH, Meirik O. Systematic review of the safety and efficacy of subcutaneous and intramuscular depot medroxyprogesterone acetate. Contraception. 2016;93(1):1–12.
3. Society of Family Planning. Self-administered DMPA-SC is safe, feasible, and acceptable: Science brief. Society FP; 2023.
4. Comfort AB, et al. Provision of DMPA-SC for self-administration in different service settings increased during the COVID-19 pandemic but overall availability remains low. Contraception. 2024;.
5. Population Foundation of India. Position paper on DMPA-SC in India. Population Foundation of India; 2024.
6. Bado AR, et al. Determinants of DMPA-SC self-care/self-injectable use: evidence from Burkina Faso. Front Glob Womens Health. 2024;1:1385446.
7. Sims J, et al. Depo-medroxyprogesterone acetate, weight gain and bleeding patterns: a retrospective review. [PubMed]. 2020. PMID: 31928370.
8. Hasmudin OF, et al. Complications and bleeding patterns associated with prolonged DMPA use: mini-review. Gynecol Reprod Med J. 2023;.
9. Ipas Development Foundation. Insights and recommendations for facilitating DMPA-SC self-administration in India: policy brief. IDF; 2023.
10. Sharma S, et al. Feasibility of injectable depot medroxyprogesterone acetate: study from India. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2016;5(12).
11. Sharma S, Gupta S, Malhotra N. Acceptance and continuation of injectable depot medroxyprogesterone acetate among Indian women. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2016;5(12):4301–4306.
12. Sethi R, Gupta P, Bansal M. Injectable contraceptives: acceptability, continuation and side effects. J Obstet Gynecol India. 2015;65(5):312–316.
13. Khan ME, Hazra A, Kant A. Continuation and discontinuation of DMPA injectable contraception in India. Stud Fam Plann. 2014;45(4):409–425.
14. Bhatia P, Nangia S, Aggarwal S. Bleeding patterns and acceptability of DMPA: a Prospective and retrospective study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2011;5(3):498–502.
15. Hubacher D, Lopez L, Steiner MJ, Dorflinger L. Menstrual pattern changes from levonorgestrel subdermal implants and DMPA: systematic review. Contraception. 2009;80(2):113–118.
16. Berenson AB, Rahman M. Changes in weight, total fat, percent body fat, and central-to-peripheral fat ratio associated with injectable and oral contraceptive use. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;200(3):329.e1–329.e8.
17. Bonny AE, Secic M, Cromer BA. Relationship between perceived weight gain and discontinuation of DMPA. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2011;24(4):227–231.
18. World Health Organization. Selected practice recommendations for contraceptive use. 3rd ed. Geneva: WHO; 2016.
19. Jain AK, Obare F, RamaRao S, Askew I. Reducing unmet need by supporting women with met need. Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2013;39(3):133–141.
20. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India. Injectable contraceptive (DMPA) services: reference manual. New Delhi: MoHFW; 2017.

