MICROBIAL ETIOLOGY OF CHRONIC SUPPURATIVE OTITIS MEDIA AND ITS ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE PATTERN : AN OBSERVATIONAL STUDY
Main Article Content
Keywords
Chronic suppurative otitis media; Microbial etiology; Antimicrobial resistance; Antibiotic susceptibility; Ear discharge
Abstract
Chronic suppurative otitis media (CSOM) is a persistent infection of the middle ear cleft and remains a significant public health problem in developing countries. The disease is associated with preventable hearing loss and serious complications. Increasing antimicrobial resistance among CSOM pathogens has made effective management challenging, necessitating periodic evaluation of microbial etiology and susceptibility patterns.
Objectives: To determine the microbial etiology of chronic suppurative otitis media and to analyze the antimicrobial resistance and susceptibility patterns of the isolated organisms.
Materials and Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted at a tertiary care center and included 110 patients clinically diagnosed with CSOM. Ear discharge samples were collected under aseptic precautions and subjected to Gram staining and aerobic culture. Bacterial isolates were identified using standard microbiological techniques. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed by the Kirby–Bauer disk diffusion method in accordance with Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and appropriate inferential tests.
Results: The mean age of patients was 28.6 ± 14.2 years, with a male predominance (56.4%). Unilateral disease was observed in 70.9% of cases. Culture positivity was seen in 89.1% of samples. Gram-negative organisms predominated (67.9%). Pseudomonas aeruginosa (38.4%) was the most common isolate, followed by Staphylococcus aureus (26.8%). Pseudomonas aeruginosa showed high sensitivity to meropenem (92.9%), polymyxin B (90.5%), and cefoperazone–sulbactam (85.7%), with significant resistance to aminoglycosides. Staphylococcus aureus demonstrated 100% sensitivity to linezolid and vancomycin, while penicillin resistance was observed in 76.2% of isolates. MRSA constituted 18.2% of Staphylococcus aureus isolates.
Conclusion: Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus were the predominant pathogens in CSOM, with significant antimicrobial resistance observed. Regular surveillance and culture-guided antibiotic therapy are essential for effective management and rational antibiotic use in CSOM.
References
2. Indudharan R, Haq JA, Aiyar S. Antibiotics in chronic suppurative otitis media: a bacteriologic study. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1999;108(5):440–445.
3. Smith JA, Danner CJ. Complications of chronic otitis media and cholesteatoma. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2006;39:1237–1255.
4. Varshney S, Nangia A, Bist SS, Singh RK, Gupta N, Bhagat S. Ossicular chain status in chronic suppurative otitis media in adults. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010;62:421–426.
5. Brook I, Frazier EH. Microbial dynamics of persistent purulent otitis media in children. J Pediatr. 1996;128(2):237–240.
6. Adhikari P, Joshi S, Baral D, Kharel B. Chronic suppurative otitis media in urban private school children of Nepal. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2009;75:669–672.
7. Wasihun AG, Zemene Y. Bacterial profile and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of otitis media in Northern Ethiopia. SpringerPlus. 2015;4:1–9.
8. Sena RB, Gandham P. Antibiotic susceptibility pattern among CSOM patients attending AIMSR. Natl J Integr Res Med. 2016;7(1).
9. Kumar D, Agarwal MK, Prakash P. Bacteriological profile of chronic suppurative otitis media in a tertiary care hospital. East J Med Sci. 2016:5–7.
10. Yogeesha B, Venkatesha B. Bacteriological profile and antibiotic sensitivity pattern in chronic otitis media. IOSR J Dent Med Sci. 2016;1:82–86.
11. Okesola AO, Fasina OA. Trends in the resistance pattern of bacterial pathogens of otitis media in Ibadan, Nigeria. Afr J Clin Exp Microbiol. 2012;13(1).
12. Osazuwa F, Osazuwa E, Osime C, Igharo EA, Imade PE, Lofor P, et al. Etiologic agents of otitis media in Benin City, Nigeria. N Am J Med Sci. 2011;3(2):95–98.
13. Mane PM, Basawraju A. Clinical significance of microbial flora in middle ear infections. Trop J Med Res. 2016;19:128.
14. Rath S, Das SR, Padhy RN. Surveillance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and MRSA in CSOM. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2017;83(2):201–206.
15. Brennan-Jones CG, Head K, Chong LY, Burton MJ, Schilder AG, Bhutta MF, et al. Topical antibiotics for chronic suppurative otitis media. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;1:CD013051.
16. Chandra Sahu M, Swain SK. Surveillance of antibiotic sensitivity pattern in CSOM of an Indian teaching hospital. World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019;5(2):88–94.
17. Das C, Ghosh R, Mondal T. Bacteriological profile and antibiotic sensitivity pattern in CSOM in West Bengal. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022;74(Suppl-1):501–505.
18. Okesola AO, Fasina OA. Resistance trends in otitis media pathogens. Afr J Clin Exp Microbiol. 2012;13(1).
19. Acuin J. Burden of disease and management strategies in CSOM. BMJ Clin Evid. 2007.
20. Selvi I, Murugesan K. Antibacterial susceptibility profiling of otitis media isolates: a tertiary care centre based retrospective study. Int J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2025;11(6):685–690.
21. Maringanti D, Archana GJ. Prevalence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in CSOM cases at a tertiary care centre. Int J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017;4(1):71–75.
22. Khairkar M, Deshmukh P, Maity H, Deotale V. Chronic Suppurative Otitis Media: A Comprehensive Review of Epidemiology, Pathogenesis, Microbiology, and Complications. Cureus. 2023;15(8):e43729.
23. Kumar R, Singh G. Study of bacterial pathogens and antibiotic sensitivity pattern of ear infections in patients with chronic suppurative otitis media attending a tertiary care hospital in Panipat, India. J Med Sci Health. 2019;5(2):19–23.
24. Artono A, Purnami N, Handoko E, Widodo ADW, Juniastuti J. Pseudomonas aeruginosa in chronic suppurative otitis media. Infect Chemother. 2025 Mar;57(1):63–71.

