ROLE OF IMMATURE PLATELET FRACTION AS A PREDICTIVE MARKER IN THROMBOCYTOPENIA OF DIVERSE ETIOLOGIES

Main Article Content

Saima Iram
Nabila Akram
Hussain Farooq
Uzma Chohan
Ujala Aymun
Rabia Ameer

Keywords

Thrombocytopenia, Immature Platelet Fraction (IPF), Reticulated Platelets, Diagnostic, Hypo-productive Thrombocytopenia, Hyper-destructive Thrombocytopenia

Abstract

Thrombocytopenia presents a common diagnostic challenge with diverse etiologies, broadly categorized as hypo-productive (impaired bone marrow production) or hyper-destructive (increased peripheral consumption/destruction). Timely differentiation is crucial for management but often relies on invasive bone marrow examination. The immature platelet fraction (IPF), a measure of newly released, RNA-rich platelets, has emerged as a potential non-invasive surrogate marker of real-time thrombopoietic activity.


Aims & Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic utility of IPF as a predictive marker in thrombocytopenia of diverse etiologies. The primary objectives were to compare IPF levels between hypo-productive and hyper-destructive groups, assess its correlation with platelet count, determine its diagnostic performance in etiological differentiation, and explore its clinical applicability.


Methodology: This is observational cross-sectional study was conducted in Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sheikh Zayed Hospital and Medical College, Lahore, over six months. A total of 113 patients with confirmed thrombocytopenia (platelet count <150×10⁹/L) were enrolled and categorized into hypo-productive (n=45) and hyper-destructive (n=68) groups based on clinical and laboratory evaluation. IPF and complete blood count parameters were measured using a Sysmex XN-1000 hematology analyzer. Statistical analysis included independent sample t-tests, Pearson correlation, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.


Results & Findings: A highly significant difference in mean IPF was observed between the hyper-destructive (11.8% ± 3.4) and hypo-productive (4.2% ± 1.9) groups (p < 0.001). A strong inverse correlation existed between platelet count and IPF (r = -0.62, p < 0.001). ROC curve analysis identified an IPF cutoff of >7.0% for distinguishing hyper-destructive from hypo-productive thrombocytopenia with a sensitivity of 85.3%, specificity of 82.2%, and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.88, indicating excellent diagnostic accuracy.


Conclusion: The immature platelet fraction is a highly effective, rapid, and non-invasive biomarker for differentiating the underlying mechanism of thrombocytopenia. Its excellent discriminatory power supports its integration into routine diagnostic algorithms to guide clinical decision-making, potentially reducing the need for invasive bone marrow procedures in initial evaluation. Standardization and prospective outcome studies are recommended for broader clinical adoption.


 

Abstract 0 | PDF Downloads 0

References

1. Rodeghiero F, Stasi R, Gernsheimer T, Michel M, Provan D, Arnold DM, et al. Standardization of terminology, definitions and outcome criteria in immune thrombocytopenic purpura of adults and children: report from an international working group. Blood. 2009;113(11):2386-93.
2. Thachil J, Warkentin TE. How do we approach thrombocytopenia in critically ill patients? Br J Haematol. 2017;177(1):27-38.
3. Hoffman R, Benz EJ, Silberstein LE, Heslop HE, Weitz JI, Anastasi J, et al. Hematology: Basic Principles and Practice. 7th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; 2018.
4. Vagdatli E, Gounari E, Lazaridou E, Katsibourlia E, Tsikopoulou F, Labrianou I. Platelet distribution width: a simple, practical and specific marker of activation of coagulation. Hippokratia. 2010;14(1):28-32.
5. Briggs C, Kunka S, Hart D, Oguni S, Machin SJ. Assessment of an immature platelet fraction (IPF) in peripheral thrombocytopenia. Br J Haematol. 2004;126(1):93-9.
6. Abe Y, Wada H, Tomatsu H, Sakaguchi A, Nishioka J, Yabu Y, et al. A simple technique to determine thrombopoiesis level using immature platelet fraction (IPF). Thromb Res. 2006;118(4):463-9.
7. Strauss G, Vollert C, von Stackelberg A, Weimann A, Gaedicke G, Schulze H. Immature platelet count: a simple parameter for distinguishing thrombocytopenia in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia from immune thrombocytopenia. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2011;57(4):641-7.
8. Jung H, Jeon HK, Kim HJ, Kim SH. Immature platelet fraction: a useful marker for identifying the cause of thrombocytopenia and predicting platelet recovery. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020;99(7):e19096.
9. Rinder HM. Platelets and Thrombopoiesis: The Role of the Immature Platelet Fraction. Clin Lab News. 2016;42(5).
10. Letestu R, Marzac C, Audat F, Woinant F, Debili N, Rameau P, et al. Use of the immature platelet fraction in the diagnosis of thrombocytopenia in critically ill patients. J Crit Care. 2019;52:214-9.
11. van der Linden T, Soumounou Y, Tardy-Poncet B, Bousquet B, de Maistre E, Pouplard C, et al. Immature platelet fraction (IPF) measured on the Sysmex XN hemocytometer predicts thrombocytopenia recovery in critically ill patients with septic shock. Ann Intensive Care. 2022;12(1):8.
12. Noris P, Klersy C, Gresele P, Giona F, Giordano P, Minuz P, et al. Platelet size for distinguishing between immune thrombocytopenia and hypo-productive thrombocytopenia. J Thromb Haemost. 2013;11(5):937-43.
13. Pons I, Monteagudo M, Lucchetti G, Muñoz L, Perea G, Colomina I, et al. Correlation between immature platelet fraction and reticulated platelets. Useful and inexpensive. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2010;48(2):147-51.
14. Balduini CL, Noris P. Platelet count and aging. Haematologica. 2014;99(6):953-5.
15. Neunert C, Terrell DR, Arnold DM, Buchanan G, Cines DB, Cooper N, et al. American Society of Hematology 2019 guidelines for immune thrombocytopenia. Blood Adv. 2019;3(23):3829-66.
16. Levi M, Scully M. How I treat disseminated intravascular coagulation. Blood. 2018;131(8):845-54.
17. Psaila B, Bussel JB, Linden MD, Babula B, Li Y, Barnard MR, et al. In vivo effects of eltrombopag on platelet function in immune thrombocytopenia: no evidence of platelet activation. Blood. 2012;119(17):4066-72.
18. Ando T, Kikuta T, Goto M, Koyamada R, Onodera K, Okamoto S. Immature platelet fraction for prediction of platelet engraftment after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2017;52(2):312-5.
19. Park SH, Ha SO, Cho YU, Jang S, Park CJ, Hong SB. Immature platelet fraction in septic patients: clinical relevance of immature platelet fraction is limited to the sensitive and accurate discrimination of septic patients from non-septic patients, not to the discrimination of survivors from non-survivors. Ann Clin Lab Sci. 2016;46(1):21-7.
20. Cremer M, Weimann A, Szekessy D, Hammerling R, Stemer G, Fischer D, et al. Immature platelet values indicate impaired platelet production in patients with thrombocytopenia. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2018;56(6):980-8.

Most read articles by the same author(s)