DETECTION OF METALLO BETA LACTAMASE PRODUCTION AMONG ENTEROBACTERIACEAE ISOLATES RECOVERED FROM CLINICAL SPECIMENS IN A TERTIARY CARE IN CENTRAL INDIA

Main Article Content

Shubham Shekhawat
Dr. Munesh Kumar Sharma

Keywords

Enterobacteriaceae, mCIM, Metallo-Beta-Lactamase Producer, Minimum Inhibitory Concentration, Double Disk Synergy Test, E-test, IPM-Double Disc test., Metallo B-lactamase, carbapenum resistant, Antimicrobial resistant, Phenotypic detection

Abstract

Introduction: Recent observations have shown a rise in reports of metallo-beta-lactamase (MBL) producing isolates within the Enterobacteriaceae family. This alarming trend highlights a critical concern in the medical field: the diminishing number of effective therapeutic options for treating infections caused by these resistant organisms. As MBL enzymes enable bacteria to evade the effects of an array of beta-lactam antibiotics, healthcare providers face increasingly challenging scenarios in managing infections, underscoring the urgent need for novel treatment strategies and heightened surveillance.


Materials & Methods: This study was conducted in the Department of Microbiology at Index Medical College, Hospital & Research Centre in Indore, M.P. A total of 200 isolates of Enterobacteriaceae were included in this study. Resistance to imipenem was determined in isolates by disc diffusion and the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) method. Imipenem-resistant isolates were tested for MBL production by the Double Disk Synergy Test, MRP-EDTA IMP-EDTA combined disc test, and E-test.


Results: out of 200 isolates, 37(44.6%) were MBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae strains. Among which, E. coli (20, 24.1%) was the most prevalent organism, followed by K. pneumoniae (14, 16.9%), and Citrobacter Spp. (3, 3.6%).


Conclusion: This study demonstrated a high prevalence of MBL-producing Enterobacterales alongside widespread multidrug resistance, highlighting the need for regular surveillance and strict infection control measures to limit the dissemination of resistant strains.

Abstract 0 | Pdf Downloads 0

References

1. WHO. Guidelines for the prevention and control of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in health care facilities. 2017.
2. World Health Organization. WHO updates list of drug-resistant bacteria most threatening to human health. 2024 May 17. (update on carbapenem-resistant pathogens).
3. Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR). Antimicrobial resistance surveillance and research network annual report. New Delhi: ICMR; 2023.
4. Romney M Humphries, Janet A Hindler, Erin Epson, Sam Horwich-Scholefield, et al. Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Detection Practices in California: What Are We Missing?, Clinical Infectious Diseases, Volume 66, Issue 7, 1 April 2018, Pages 1061–1067, https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cix942
5. Urilio C, Sansone P, Barbarisi M, Pota V, Giaccari LG, Coppolino F, Barbarisi A, Passavanti MB, Pace MC. Mechanisms of Action of Carbapenem Resistance. Antibiotics (Basel). 2022 Mar 21;11(3):421. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11030421.
6. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing; 34th ed. CLSI Supplement M100. Wayne, PA: CLSI; 2024.
7. European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST). Breakpoint Tables for Interpretation of MICs and Zone Diameters. Version 14.0. Basel, Switzerland: EUCAST; 2024.
8. Nordmann P, Naas T, Poirel L. Global spread of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011;17(10):1791–1798.
9. Logan LK, Weinstein RA. The epidemiology of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae: The impact and evolution of a global menace. J Infect Dis. 2017;215(Suppl_1):S28–S36.
10. Tamma PD, et al. Identification and treatment of carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria in the clinical laboratory. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2022;35(3):e00021-22.
11. van Dijk K, Voets GM, Scharringa J, et al. A disc diffusion assay for detection of carbapenemase production by Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas spp. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014;20(4):O345–O349.
12. Pierce VM, Simner PJ, Lonsway DR, et al. Modified carbapenem inactivation method for phenotypic detection of carbapenemase production among Enterobacteriaceae. J Clin Microbiol. 2017;55(8):2321–2333.
13. Magill SS, O’Leary E, Janelle SJ, et al. Changes in prevalence of health care–associated infections in U.S. hospitals. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(18):1732–1744.
14. Russo TA, Marr CM. Hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2019;32(3):e00001-19.
15. Paterson DL, Bonomo RA. Extended-spectrum β-lactamases: a clinical update. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2005;18(4):657–686.
16. Jacoby GA. AmpC β-lactamases. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2009;22(1):161–182.
17. Nordmann P, Naas T, Poirel L. Global spread of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011;17(10):1791–1798.
18. Codjoe FS, Donkor ES. Carbapenem resistance: a review. Med Sci (Basel). 2017;6(1):1.
19. Tamma PD, Aitken SL, Bonomo RA, Mathers AJ, van Duin D, Clancy CJ. Infectious Diseases Society of America guidance on the treatment of AmpC β-lactamase–producing Enterobacterales, Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infections. Clin Infect Dis. 2022;74(12):2089–2114.
20. Giske CG, Martinez-Martinez L, Cantón R, et al. Detection of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in clinical laboratories. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2017;23(9):667–673.
21. Tamma PD, Simner PJ. Phenotypic detection of carbapenemase-producing organisms from clinical isolates. J Clin Microbiol. 2018;56(11):e01140-18.
22. Dhakal B, Rai J, Raut S. et al. Detection of Metallo-beta-lactamase Producers among Clinical Isolates of Enterobacterales in a Tertiary Care Centre, Nepal. Mod Med Lab J. 2024; 7(1): 12-20.
23. Bae IK, Suh B, Jeong SH, et al. Molecular epidemiology of Pseudomonasaeruginosa clinical isolates from Korea producing beta-lactamasewith extendeded-spectrum activity. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2014;79(3):373–377.
24. Hong DJ, Bae IK, Jang IH, Jeong SH, Kang HK, Lee KEpidemiology andnd characteristics of metallo-beta-lactamase-producing Pseudomonasaeruginosa. Infect Chemother. 2015;47(2):81–97.
25. Srinivasan VB, Rajamohan G, Pancholi P, Stevenson K, Tadesse D, Patchanee P, MarconM, Gebreyes WA. Genetic relatedness and molecular characterisation multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii isolated in central Ohio, USA. Annals clinical microbiology and antimicrobials. 2009;8(1):21.
26. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). About Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE). Atlanta, GA: CDC; 2024.
27. Naim H, et al. Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance pattern of Enterobacteriaceae isolates from wound infections. Int J Res Med Sci. 2019;7(2):452–457.
28. Balan K, et al. Bacteriological profile and antimicrobial susceptibility of wound infections in a tertiary care hospital. J Clin Diagn Res. 2018;12(5):DC01–DC05.
29. Zaiddah Z, et al. Pattern of bacterial isolates from various clinical samples in tertiary care settings. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017;11(7):DC01–DC05.
30. Khare V, et al. Detection of metallo-β-lactamase production in clinical isolates from a tertiary care hospital. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2017;60(4):541–545.
31. Jagnath M, et al. Prevalence of MBL-producing Gram-negative bacilli in wound infections. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014;8(9):DC20–DC23.
32. Saseedharan S, ManisaSahu. et al. Act Fast as Time Is Less: High Faecal Carriage of CarbapenemResistant Enterobacteriaceae in Critical Care Patients. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 2016;10(9): DC01-DC05.
33. Jain P., GANDHI V. et al. Phenotypic Detection of Metallo-β-Lactamase Producing Enterobacteriaceae. International Journal of Microbiology Research. 2012;4( 9):326-329.
34. Iman F. El-Ghazzawy, A Marwa. et al. Phenotypic and genotypic methods for detection of metallo beta lactamases among carbapenem resistant Enterobacteriaceae clinical isolates in Alexandria Main University Hospital. African Journal of Microbiology Research. 2016; 10(1):32-40.