COMPARATIVE STUDY OF CEMENTED VERSUS CEMENTLESS TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY

Main Article Content

Manmatha Nayak
Somnath Baskey
Sarthak Sahoo

Keywords

Total hip arthroplasty; Cemented fixation; Cementless fixation; Pharmacologic utilization; Population health outcomes

Abstract

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is an established therapeutic intervention for advanced degenerative and traumatic hip disorders. While both cemented and cementless fixation techniques are widely used, their comparative influence on therapeutic effectiveness, pharmacologic utilization, and population-level clinical outcomes in routine clinical practice remains incompletely characterized. To compare therapeutic and functional outcomes, postoperative pharmacologic requirements, and population-level clinical outcomes between cemented and cementless total hip arthroplasty. A retrospective comparative cohort study was conducted at SCB Medical College, Cuttack, a tertiary care hospital, from January 2023 to January 2025, involving 120 patients who underwent primary total hip arthroplasty. Patients were equally divided into cemented (n = 60) and cementless (n = 60) fixation groups. Data on demographic characteristics, postoperative pain scores, functional outcomes, medication utilization, complications, mortality, and length of hospital stay were extracted from medical records. Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, independent t-tests, correlation analysis, and multivariate linear regression. Both fixation techniques resulted in significant improvement in postoperative pain relief and functional recovery, with comparable long-term outcomes. Cemented THA was associated with lower pain scores at discharge and shorter duration of postoperative analgesic use compared with cementless THA (p < 0.001). Length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the cemented group. Correlation analysis demonstrated a moderate positive association between postoperative pain intensity and analgesic duration (r = 0.46, p < 0.001). Regression analysis identified cementless fixation, higher pain scores, and prolonged analgesic use as independent predictors of longer hospital stay. Cemented and cementless THA provide comparable long-term therapeutic benefits; however, cemented fixation is associated with reduced early postoperative pain, lower pharmacologic burden, and shorter hospitalization. These findings highlight the importance of integrating therapeutic and population-level considerations in fixation selection.

Abstract 0 | Pdf Downloads 0

References

1. Goyal D, Bansal M, Lamoria R. Comparative study of functional outcome of cemented and uncemented total hip replacement. Journal of Orthopaedics, Traumatology and Rehabilitation. 2018 Jan 1;10(1):23-8.
2. Murylev VY, Muzychenkov AV, Zhuchkov AG, Tsygin NA, Rigin NV, Elizarov PM, Kukovenko GA. Functional outcomes comparative analysis of cemented and uncemented total knee arthroplasty. Journal of Orthopaedics. 2020 Jul 1;20:268-74.
3. Phedy P, Ismail HD, Hoo C, Djaja YP. Total hip replacement: A meta-analysis to evaluate survival of cemented, cementless and hybrid implants. World journal of orthopedics. 2017 Feb 18;8(2):192.
4. Liu Y, Zeng Y, Wu Y, Li M, Xie H, Shen B. A comprehensive comparison between cementless and cemented fixation in the total knee arthroplasty: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research. 2021 Mar 5;16(1):176.
5. Nam D, Lawrie CM, Salih R, Nahhas CR, Barrack RL, Nunley RM. Cemented versus cementless total knee arthroplasty of the same modern design: a prospective, randomized trial. JBJS. 2019 Jul 3;101(13):1185-92.
6. Prudhon JL, Verdier R. Cemented or cementless total knee arthroplasty? Comparative results of 200 cases at a minimum follow-up of 11 years. Sicot-j. 2017 Dec 12;3:70.
7. Ko H, Pelt CE, Martin BI, Pellegrini Jr VD. Patient-reported outcomes following cemented versus cementless primary total knee arthroplasty: a comparative analysis based on propensity score matching. BMC musculoskeletal disorders. 2022 Oct 27;23(1):934.
8. Prasad AK, Tan JH, Bedair HS, Dawson-Bowling S, Hanna SA. Cemented vs. cementless fixation in primary total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. EFORT open reviews. 2020 Nov 13;5(11):793-8.
9. Liu Z, Wen L, Zhou L, Liu Z, Chen Y, Geng B, Xia Y. Comparison of cemented and cementless fixation in total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis and systematic review of RCTs. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery. 2024 Nov 19;32(3):10225536241267270.
10. Onggo J, Phan K, Wilson C. Comparison of infection in cemented, cementless and hybrid primary total knee arthroplasty: a network meta‐analysis and systematic review of randomized clinical trials. ANZ Journal of Surgery. 2020 Jul;90(7-8):1289-98.
11. Raja BS, Gowda AK, Singh S, Ansari S, Kalia RB, Paul S. Comparison of functional outcomes and complications of cemented vs uncemented total hip arthroplasty in the elderly neck of femur fracture patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma. 2022 Jun 1;29:101876.
12. Garland A, Gordon M, Garellick G, Kärrholm J, Sköldenberg O, Hailer NP. Risk of early mortality after cemented compared with cementless total hip arthroplasty: a nationwide matched cohort study. The Bone & Joint Journal. 2017 Jan 1;99(1):37-43.
13. Veldman HD, Heyligers IC, Grimm B, Boymans TA. Cemented versus cementless hemiarthroplasty for a displaced fracture of the femoral neck: a systematic review and meta-analysis of current generation hip stems. The bone & joint journal. 2017 Apr 1;99(4):421-31.
14. Hannon CP, Salih R, Barrack RL, Nunley RM. Cementless versus cemented total knee arthroplasty: concise midterm results of a prospective randomized controlled trial. JBJS. 2023 Sep 20;105(18):1430-4.
15. Yoo JI, Cha YH, Kim KJ, Kim HY, Choy WS, Hwang SC. Comparison between cementless and cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty for treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fractures: systematic review and meta-analysis. Hip & pelvis. 2018 Dec;30(4):241-53.
16. Yoon BH, Seo JG, Koo KH. Comparison of postoperative infection-related complications between cemented and cementless hemiarthroplasty in elderly patients: a meta-analysis. Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery. 2017 May 8;9(2):145.
17. Gwam CU, George NE, Etcheson JI, Rosas S, Plate JF, Delanois RE. Cementless versus cemented fixation in total knee arthroplasty: usage, costs, and complications during the inpatient period. The journal of knee surgery. 2019 Nov;32(11):1081-7.
18. Chen C, Shi Y, Wu Z, Gao Z, Chen Y, Guo C, Bao X. Long-term effects of cemented and cementless fixations of total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research. 2021 Oct 12;16(1):590.
19. Clar C, Leitner L, Koutp A, Hauer G, Rasic L, Leithner A, Sadoghi P. The worldwide survival rate of total hip arthroplasties is improving: a systematic comparative analysis using worldwide hip arthroplasty registers. EFORT Open Reviews. 2024 Aug 1;9(8):745-50.
20. Pacoret V, Kalk E, Labattut L, Girardot G, Baulot E, Martz P. Survival rate of cemented versus cementless tibial component in primary total knee arthroplasty over 5 years of follow-up: comparative study of 109 prostheses. SICOT-J. 2020 Sep 8;6:36.
21. Giovanoulis V, Kenanidis E, Aïm F, Gamie Z, Marmor S, Potoupnis M, Lustig S, Tsiridis E. Collared versus collarless hydroxyapatite-coated stems for primary cementless total hip arthroplasty; a systematic review of comparative studies. Is there any difference in survival, functional, and radiographic outcomes?. SICOT-J. 2024 Feb 15;10:8.
22. Elbardesy H, Anazor F, Mirza M, Aly M, Maatough A. Cemented versus uncemented stems for revision total hip replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World Journal of Orthopedics. 2023 Aug 18;14(8):630.
23. Chen C, Li R. Cementless versus cemented total knee arthroplasty in young patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research. 2019 Aug 19;14(1):262.
24. Prudhon JL, Verdier R, Caton JH. Primary cementless total knee arthroplasty with or without stem extension: a matched comparative study of ninety eight standard stems versus ninety eight long stems after more than ten years of follow-up. International Orthopaedics. 2019 Aug 6;43(8):1849-57.
25. Van Praet F, Mulier M. To cement or not to cement acetabular cups in total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and re-evaluation. SICOT-J. 2019 Oct 1;5:35.