MEDTECH LITERACY AMONG UNDERGRADUATE MEDICAL STUDENTS: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY ASSESSING INFRASTRUCTURE, CLINICAL USE, AWARENESS, AND PERCEIVED BARRIERS
Main Article Content
Keywords
MedTech Literacy, Medical Technology, Undergraduate Medical Students, Digital Health, Health Technology Education
Abstract
Digital transformation has reshaped clinical practice and medical learning. However, the extent of MedTech preparedness among medical students remains uncertain.
Objectives: To assess MedTech literacy, usage patterns, awareness of emerging technologies, and perceived barriers among medical students.
Methods: A validated structured questionnaire was administered to undergraduate students. A composite MedTech Literacy Score (0–40) was calculated. Data were summarized using descriptive statistics, chi‑square tests, and ANOVA.
Results: Among 312 respondents, smartphone ownership was 100%, laptops 78.8%, and reliable internet 68.9%. Only 41.3% reported frequent use of clinical decision-support apps. Awareness of AI in diagnostics was moderate (mean 3.2 ± 1.0/5), while only 18.6% were familiar with the Internet of Medical Things. Overall literacy was high in 34.9%, moderate in 47.8%, and low in 17.3%. Higher literacy correlated with senior year (p = 0.003) and prior digital-health
training (p < 0.001). Major barriers included lack of training (61.2%) and subscription costs (42.0%).
Conclusion: Students show strong access to technology but gaps in structured clinical application and conceptual digital‑health readiness. Integrating digital‑health modules and faculty training may improve preparedness.
References
2. Wartman SA, Combs CD. Medical education must move from the information age to the age of artificial intelligence. Acad Med. 2018;93(8):1107–1109.
3. O’Connor S, Hanlon P, O’Donnell CA, Garcia S, Glanville J, Mair FS. Understanding factors affecting patient and public engagement and recruitment to digital health interventions: a systematic review of qualitative studies. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2016; 16:120.
4. Mehta NB, Hull AL, Young JB, Stoller JK. Just imagine: new paradigms for medical education. Acad Med. 2013;88(10):1418–1423.
5. Vincent A, Semple JL, Sanmugalingam T, Hanna WC, Detsky AS. Virtual care for surgeons: a narrative review and future directions. Ann Surg. 2022;275(4): e630–e635.
6. Mian A, Khan S. Medical education during pandemics: a UK perspective. BMC Med. 2020; 18:100.
7. Lin SY, Mahoney MR, Sinsky CA. Ten ways artificial intelligence will transform primary care. J Gen Intern Med. 2019;34(8):1626–1630.
8. O’Donoghue O, Doody O, Lyons R, et al. Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of eHealth services: systematic review. JMIR Med Inform. 2021;9(7):e23873.
9. Shortliffe EH, Sepúlveda MJ. Clinical decision support in the era of artificial intelligence. JAMA. 2018;320(21):2199–2200.
10. Thiyagarajan A, Grant C, Griffiths F, Atherton H. Exploring patients’ and clinicians’ experiences of video consultations in primary care: a systematic scoping review. BJGP Open. 2020;4(1): bjgpopen20X101020.
11. McCoy LG, Nagaraj S, Morgado F, Harish V, Das S, Bhattacharya S. What do medical students actually learn from EHR-based training? A scoping review. BMC Med Educ. 2020;20:200.
12. Frank JR, Snell L, Sherbino J, editors. CanMEDS 2015 Physician Competency Framework. Ottawa: Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada; 2015.
13. Mesko B, Győrffy Z. The rise of the empowered physician in the digital health era: viewpoint. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21(3):e12490.
14. Compton S, Barash D, Vernorio A, et al. Development and implementation of a digital health curriculum for undergraduate medical education. MedEdPORTAL. 2020;16:10958.
15. Greenhalgh T, Wherton J, Shaw S, Morrison C. Video consultations for covid-19. BMJ. 2020;368:m998.

