PREDICTION OF PREECLAMPSIA BASED ON MATERNAL RISK FACTORS, MEAN ARTERIAL PRESSURE AND UTERINE ARTERY PULSATILITY INDEX AT FIRST TRIMESTER OF PREGNANCY: A FIRST DESCRIPTIVE OBSERVATIONAL STUDY FROM NORTHEAST INDIA.
Main Article Content
Keywords
Preeclampsia, First Trimester, Gestosis Scoring, Maternal Risk Factors, Mean Arterial Pressure, Uterine Artery Pulsatility Index
Abstract
Preeclampsia (PE) is a pregnancy disorder and a major factor associated with adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes, including death. Combining maternal risk factors (MF), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and uterine artery Doppler pulsatility index (UtA-PI) provides an effective screening for predicting preterm PE. This study sought to predict the PE based on MF, MAP, and UtA-PI at first trimester of pregnancy.
Methods: The research involves 80 pregnant women, all in their first trimester at 11-13+6 weeks. PE prediction was achieved using MF, MAP, and UtA Doppler measurements. Early trimester GS and ultrasound were performed using a SAMSUNG SonoAce R7 with a 3.5 MHz curvilinear probe.
Results: The PE was diagnosed in 22/80 (27.5%) women. Our study provides evidence that MF (p=0.018), an elevated MAP (p<0.00002), and UtA-PI (p<0.00001) are significant predictors of an increased risk of PE. A combination of MF, MAP, and mean UtA-PI proved to be a useful predictor tool for the detection of PE (p<0.00001). MF achieved a sensitivity of 95.45%, a specificity of 29.31%, and a detection rate of 26.25%. MAP produced a sensitivity of 63.64%, a specificity of 84.48%, and a detection rate of 17.50%. UtA-PI demonstrated a high specificity (96.55%), lower sensitivity (68.18%), leading to a detection rate of 18.75%.
Conclusion: The Integrated use of MF, MAP, and UtA Doppler information effectively identified a significant number of patients with preterm PE. Early detection of risk factors, strong screening methods, and regular monitoring are essential for accurately predicting PE and initiating preventive therapy promptly.
References
2. Leite JF, Lobo GAR, Nowak PM, Antunes IR, Araujo Júnior E, Pares DBDS. Prediction of preeclampsia in the first trimester of pregnancy using maternal characteristics, mean arterial pressure, and uterine artery Doppler data in a Brazilian population. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2019;62(6):391-6.
3. Das E, Singh V, Agrawal S, Pati SK. Prediction of Preeclampsia Using First-Trimester Uterine Artery Doppler and Pregnancy-Associated Plasma Protein-A (PAPP-A): A Prospective Study in Chhattisgarh, India. Cureus. 2022;14(2):e22026.
4. Wang X, Sahota DS, Wong L, Nguyen-Hoang L, Chen Y, Tai AST, et al. Prediction of pre-eclampsia using maternal hemodynamic parameters at 12 + 0 to 15 + 6 weeks. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2025;65(2):173-82.
5. Wolie Asres A, Tilahun AW, Addissie A. Factors associated with preeclampsia among pregnant women in Gojjam zones, Amhara region, Ethiopia: a case-control study. Blood Press. 2023;32(1):2255687.
6. Poon LC, Kametas NA, Pandeva I, Valencia C, Nicolaides KH. Mean arterial pressure at 11(+0) to 13(+6) weeks in the prediction of preeclampsia. Hypertension. 2008;51(4):1027-33.
7. Walsh CA, Baxi LV. Mean arterial pressure and prediction of pre-eclampsia. BMJ. 2008;336(7653):1079-80.
8. Mayrink J, Souza RT, Feitosa FE, Rocha Filho EA, Leite DF, Vettorazzi J, et al. Mean arterial blood pressure: potential predictive tool for preeclampsia in a cohort of healthy nulliparous pregnant women. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19(1):460.
9. Gasse C, Boutin A, Coté M, Chaillet N, Bujold E, Demers S. First-trimester mean arterial blood pressure and the risk of preeclampsia: The Great Obstetrical Syndromes (GOS) study. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2018;12:178-82.
10. Donno V, Prats P, Rodriguez I, Polyzos NP. First-trimester uterine artery pulsatility index and preeclampsia risk in pregnancies after artificial frozen embryo transfer: analysis of over 27,000 pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2025;232(5):464.e1-e9.
11. Bonacina E, Del Barco E, Farràs A, Dalmau M, Garcia E, Gleeson-Vallbona L, et al. Role of routine uterine artery Doppler at 18-22 and 24-28 weeks' gestation following routine first-trimester screening for pre-eclampsia. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2025;65(1):63-70.
12. Rathore I, T SM, A P, P MS. Gestosis Score in Antenatal Care: A Practical Approach to Pre-eclampsia Risk Assessment. Cureus. 2025;17(10): e93891.
13. Gómez O, Figueras F, Fernández S, Bennasar M, Martínez JM, Puerto B, Gratacós E. Reference ranges for uterine artery mean pulsatility index at 11-41 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008;32(2):128-32.
14. P Kundargi A, K Naagar J, Jain R, Mishra N, Tiwari P. Hypertensive disorder prediction among first-trimester antenatal patients using Gestosis score. Bioinformation. 2025;21(4):618-22.
15. Kalambe MA, Soni NN, Ali S, Bankar NJ. An Observational Study of Maternal and Perinatal Outcome in Preeclampsia Cases in a Tertiary Care Center. Cureus. 2024;16(4):e59352.
16. Mönckeberg M, Arias V, Fuenzalida R, Álvarez S, Toro V, Calvo A, et al. Diagnostic Performance of First Trimester Screening of Preeclampsia Based on Uterine Artery Pulsatility Index and Maternal Risk Factors in Routine Clinical Use. Diagnostics (Basel). 2020;10(4):182.
17. Wright A, Wright D, Ispas CA, Poon LC, Nicolaides KH. Mean arterial pressure in the three trimesters of pregnancy: effects of maternal characteristics and medical history. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;45(6):698-706.
18. Gupta M, Yadav P, Yaqoob F. A Prospective Study to Determine the Predictive Ability of HDP-Gestosis Score for the Development of Pre-eclampsia. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2022;72(6):485-91.
19. Wang S, Dong H. Non-linear dose-response relationship between uterine artery pulsatility index and risk of preeclampsia in early pregnancy: A secondary analysis based on a nested cohort study. PLoS One. 2025;20(1):e0317625.
20. Narang S, Agarwal A, Das V, Pandey A, Agrawal S, Ali W. Prediction of pre-eclampsia at 11-14 weeks of pregnancy using mean arterial pressure, uterine artery Doppler and pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2016;5(11):3948–53.

