PATTERN AND DETERMINANTS OF PERIOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS AMONG WOMEN UNDERGOING OBSTETRIC AND GYNAECOLOGICAL SURGERIES IN A TERTIARY CARE SETTING
Main Article Content
Keywords
Perioperative complications; Obstetric surgery; Gynaecological surgery; Anaesthesia; Maternal morbidity; Hospital-based study.
Abstract
Obstetric and gynaecological surgeries constitute a major proportion of surgical workload in tertiary care hospitals and are associated with unique perioperative risks arising from physiological changes of pregnancy, high prevalence of anaemia, emergency surgical indications, and diverse anaesthetic techniques. Anaesthesia-related factors such as choice of anaesthetic technique, airway management, and intraoperative haemodynamic stability play a crucial role in perioperative outcomes. However, hospital-based data from India evaluating the burden and pattern of perioperative complications with reference to anaesthetic variables remain limited. Aims and Objectives: To assess the burden and spectrum of perioperative complications among women undergoing obstetric and gynaecological surgeries at a tertiary care hospital and to evaluate the association of selected perioperative and anaesthetic variables with these complications. Methods: A hospital-based observational study was conducted among 52 women undergoing obstetric and gynaecological surgeries at a tertiary care teaching hospital over a defined period. Data were collected using a structured proforma and included socio-demographic characteristics, type and indication of surgery, anaesthetic technique (general or regional anaesthesia), ASA physical status, airway assessment and management, intraoperative haemodynamic events, and estimated blood loss with transfusion requirement, along with preoperative clinical parameters, intraoperative events, and postoperative outcomes. Perioperative complications were classified as intraoperative and postoperative. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, and associations between selected perioperative and anaesthetic variables and the occurrence of complications were assessed using appropriate statistical tests. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Perioperative complications were observed in 40.4% of the study participants. Common intraoperative complications included hypotension, excessive blood loss, and airway-related events, while postoperative complications comprised pain requiring additional analgesia, postoperative nausea and vomiting, wound-related complications, and prolonged hospital stay. A higher incidence of complications was noted among women undergoing emergency procedures, those with higher ASA physical status, preoperative anaemia, longer duration of surgery, intraoperative haemodynamic instability, and increased blood loss requiring transfusion. Several anaesthetic and perioperative variables showed a statistically significant association with the occurrence of complications.
Conclusion: The study highlights a considerable burden of perioperative complications in obstetric and gynaecological surgeries in a tertiary care hospital setting, with anaesthetic factors playing a significant contributory role. Careful preoperative risk stratification, optimisation of anaemia, appropriate choice of anaesthetic technique, vigilant airway management, and strict intraoperative haemodynamic monitoring may help reduce perioperative morbidity. Strengthening adherence to standard anaesthetic and perioperative protocols can improve maternal surgical outcomes.
References
2. Kassebaum NJ, Bertozzi-Villa A, Coggeshall MS, et al. Global, regional, and national levels and causes of maternal mortality. Lancet. 2014;384(9947):980–1004.
3. Mhyre JM, Bateman BT, Leffert LR. Influence of patient comorbidities on the risk of near-miss maternal morbidity or mortality. Anesthesiology. 2011;115(5):963–72.
4. Biccard BM, Madiba TE, Kluyts HL, et al. Perioperative patient outcomes in the African Surgical Outcomes Study. Lancet. 2018;391(10130):1589–98.
5. Sobhy S, Arroyo-Manzano D, Murugesu N, et al. Maternal and perinatal mortality and complications associated with caesarean section in low-income and middle-income countries. Lancet. 2019;393(10184):1973–82.
6. World Health Organization. WHO statement on caesarean section rates. Geneva: WHO; 2015.
7. International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS). National Family Health Survey (NFHS-5), India, 2019–21. Mumbai: IIPS; 2021.
8. Betrán AP, Ye J, Moller AB, et al. The increasing trend in caesarean section rates: global, regional and national estimates. PLoS One. 2016;11(2):e0148343.
9. Khan KS, Wojdyla D, Say L, et al. WHO analysis of causes of maternal death. Lancet. 2006;367(9516):1066–74.
10. Apfelbaum JL, Hagberg CA, Caplan RA, et al. Practice guidelines for management of the difficult airway. Anesthesiology. 2013;118(2):251–70.
11. Gan TJ, Diemunsch P, Habib AS, et al. Consensus guidelines for the management of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Anesth Analg. 2014;118(1):85–113.
12. Kaye AD, Urman RD, Cornett EM, et al. Enhanced recovery pathways in obstetrics and gynecology. Anesthesiol Clin. 2018;36(1):59–72.
13. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. Anaemia Mukt Bharat: Operational Guidelines. New Delhi: MoHFW; 2018.
14. Musallam KM, Tamim HM, Richards T, et al. Preoperative anaemia and postoperative outcomes. Lancet. 2011;378(9800):1396–407.
15. Say L, Chou D, Gemmill A, et al. Global causes of maternal death. Lancet Glob Health. 2014;2(6):e323–33.
16. Tuncalp O, Souza JP, Gulmezoglu M. New WHO recommendations on prevention and treatment of postpartum haemorrhage. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2013;123(3):254–6.
17. Cheng H, Chen BP, Soleas IM, et al. Prolonged operative duration increases risk of surgical site infections. Surg Infect. 2017;18(6):722–35.
18. Rollins M, Lucero J. Overview of anesthetic considerations for cesarean delivery. Br Med Bull. 2012;101:105–25.
19. Hawkins JL, Chang J, Palmer SK, et al. Anesthesia-related maternal mortality in the United States. Anesthesiology. 2011;114(5):1199–206.
20. Dasta JF, McLaughlin TP, Mody SH, et al. Daily cost of intensive care unit stay. Crit Care Med. 2005;33(6):1266–71.
21. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, et al. The STROBE statement. Lancet. 2007;370(9596):1453–7.
22. Filippi V, Chou D, Ronsmans C, et al. Levels and causes of maternal morbidity. Bull World Health Organ. 2018;96(7):459–76.
23. Registrar General of India. Special Bulletin on Maternal Mortality in India. New Delhi: RGI; 2020.
24. Sobhy S, Zamora J, Dharmarajah K, et al. Anaesthesia-related maternal mortality. BJOG. 2016;123(2):274–82.
25. Sobhy S, Arroyo-Manzano D, Murugesu N, et al. Maternal and perinatal mortality and complications associated with caesarean section in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2019;393(10184):1973–82. ResearchGate
26. International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS), ICF. National Family Health Survey (NFHS-5), India 2019–21: India Report. Mumbai: IIPS; 2021. DHS Program
27. Let S, et al. Prevalence and determinants of anaemia among women of reproductive age in India: evidence from NFHS-5 (2019–21). 2024. PMC
28. Shander A, Hardy JF, Ozawa S, et al. Recommendations from the International Consensus Conference on Anemia Management in Surgical Patients (ICCAMS). 2022. PMC
29. Mundhra R, et al. Effect of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) protocol in caesarean delivery: study report. 2024. PMC
30. Gan TJ, Belani KG, Bergese S, et al. Fourth Consensus Guidelines for the Management of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting. Anesth Analg. 2020;131(2):411–48. Lippincott Journals
31. Sobhy S, Zamora J, Khan KS, Kunst H, Gulmezoglu AM, Temmerman M. Anaesthesia- related maternal morbidity and mortality: An updated systematic review. BJOG. 2022;129(6):889–899.
32. Driessen M, Zwart JJ, van Roosmalen J, Bloemenkamp KWM. Severe maternal morbidity related to obstetric surgery and anaesthesia. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2021;74:37–49.
33. Bauer ME, Bernstein K, Dinges E, et al. Obstetric anesthesia workforce survey and patient safety implications. Anesth Analg. 2021;132(1):e1–e9.

