BEHAVIORS THAT COMPROMISE TRUST IN RESIDENCY PROGRAMS
Main Article Content
Keywords
Entrustment, trainee/resident, supervisor, Competence, Clinical specialties. Residency programs, Attributes, Clinical supervision
Abstract
Background: Developing trust and reliability on others are complicated decisions to be made in the community. These are influenced via numerous challenging elements within the workplace. Endorsing supervision is defined benchmarks of entrustment, reliability and feeling comfortable, collectively with the supervisors’ roles and behaviors.
Objective: The objective of the study is to explore the behaviors of senior medical residents that affects the entrustment of supervisors to put sole responsibility for unsupervised tasks in clinical training.
Methods: A qualitative exploratory study in which 12 clinical faculty members supervising senior residents in post graduate clinical programs from Rawalpindi and allied were enrolled. They were selected by purposive sampling technique for semi-structured interviews. Thematic Data and Content analysis was carried out. Data collection and data analysis both were initiated simultaneously. Interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, analyzed manually.
Results: A total of 12 participants took part in the study and reported many factors and behaviors among trainees that affect entrustment. Five major themes were found to influence supervisor entrustment in trainees pertaining to critical and unseen situations i.e. resident attributes, working relationship, patient care and context, competence and professionalism.
Conclusion: Factors that contribute resident behaviors demonstrate trustworthiness and credibility promote entrustment by supervisors. It is analyzed that for a supervisor to build trust successfully, the requirements are to work with the resident for a significant duration, the optimum knowledge and sense of commitment are foremost.
References
2. Kariya C, Boutrous M, Amankwah KS. Autonomy, entrustment, self-efficacy, and decision-making: The current state of training independent surgeons. Semin Vasc Surg. 2025 Jun 1;38(2):132–44.
3. Ramani S, Kusurkar RA, Lyon-Maris J, Pyörälä E, Rogers GD, Samarasekera DD, et al. Mentorship in health professions education – an AMEE guide for mentors and mentees: AMEE Guide No. 167. Med Teach [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2025 Aug 12];46(8):999–1011. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0142159X.2023.2273217
4. Heath S. Promoting autonomous practice in pre-registration student nurses. https://doi.org/1012968/pnur202536261 [Internet]. 2025 Feb 18 [cited 2025 Aug 12];36(2):61–7. Available from: https://www.magonlinelibrary.com/doi/10.12968/pnur.2025.36.2.61
5. Sandhu G, Thompson-Burdine J, Dombrowski J, Sutzko DC, Nikolian VC, Boniakowski A, et al. OpTrust: An Effective Educational Bundle for Enhancing Faculty-resident Intraoperative Entrustment. Ann Surg [Internet]. 2021 Jun 1 [cited 2025 Aug 12];273(6):E255–61. Available from: https://journals.lww.com/annalsofsurgery/fulltext/2021/06000/optrust__an_effective_educational_bundle_for.38.aspx
6. Gingerich A, Daniels V, Farrell L, Olsen S, Kennedy T, Hatala R. Beyond hands‐on and hands‐off: supervisory approaches and entrustment on the inpatient ward. Med Educ. 2018;52(10):1028–40.
7. Conroy M, McCallister J, Gustin J. Entrustment Decision Making in the Intensive Care Unit It’s About More Than the Learner. ATS Sch. 2024 Mar 1;5(1):53–70.
8. Sebok-Syer SS, Lingard L, Panza M, Van Hooren TA, Rassbach CE. Supportive and collaborative interdependence: Distinguishing residents’ contributions within health care teams. Med Educ [Internet]. 2023 Oct 1 [cited 2025 Aug 5];57(10):921–31. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/medu.15064
9. Johs-Artisensi JL, Hansen KE. Resident Autonomy, Dignity, and Respect. 2022 [cited 2025 Aug 5];23–43. Available from: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-04695-7_2
10. Nelson K, McQuillan S, Gingerich A, Regehr G. Residents as supervisors: How senior residents make ad hoc entrustment decisions. Med Educ [Internet]. 2023 Aug 1 [cited 2025 Aug 5];57(8):723–31. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/medu.15017
11. Shim S, Kim H, Lee YM. Scoping review: exploring residents’ views of supervisor entrustment and its effect on learning and professional development. Korean J Med Educ [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2025 Aug 12];36(1):81. Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10925806/
12. Ginsburg S, Watling CJ, Schumacher DJ, Gingerich A, Hatala R. Numbers Encapsulate, Words Elaborate: Toward the Best Use of Comments for Assessment and Feedback on Entrustment Ratings. Academic Medicine [Internet]. 2021 Jul 1 [cited 2025 Aug 12];96(7):S81–6. Available from: https://journals.lww.com/academicmedicine/fulltext/2021/07001/numbers_encapsulate,_words_elaborate__toward_the.14.aspx
13. Millar JK, Matusko N, Evans J, Baker SJ, Lindeman B, Jung S, et al. Faculty Entrustment and Resident Entrustability. JAMA Surg [Internet]. 2024 Mar 1 [cited 2025 Aug 12];159(3):277–85. Available from: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamasurgery/fullarticle/2813698
14. Pingree EW, Huth K, Harper BD, Nakamura MM, Marcus CH, Cheston CC, et al. Encouraging Entrustment: A Qualitative Study of Resident Behaviors That Promote Entrustment. Academic Medicine [Internet]. 2020 Nov 1 [cited 2025 Aug 12];95(11):1718–25. Available from: https://journals.lww.com/academicmedicine/fulltext/2020/11000 /encouraging_entrustment__a_qualitative_study_of.54.aspx

