A PROSPECTIVE STUDY OF ANTERIOR COMPONENT SEPARATION TECHNIQUE IN REPAIR OF LARGE VENTRAL HERNIA IN A TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL OF WESTERN RAJASTHAN.

Main Article Content

Dr. Lokesh Mehta
Dr. Ganpat Singh Choudhary
Dr. Vimal Soni
Dr. Swati Mehta
Dr. Rishi Singodia
Dr. Jatin Prajapati

Keywords

ACST, Onlay mesh

Abstract

Background: In our tertiary care hospital of western rajasthan, we attend a number of ventral hernia patients. The incidence of incisional hernia after abdominal surgery likely exceeds 20% and can result in large, complex ventral hernias with loss of abdominal domain. This study was done to see the feasibility of Anterior component separation technique (ACST) with Onlay mesh repair of large ventral hernia not amenable to primary closure. This technique can restore abdominal wall functionality for defects up to 20 cm in transverse dimension at the level of the umbilicus.


 


Methods: 25 patients with large ventral hernia not amenable to primary closure were repaired by ACST with Onlay mesh augmentation. Preoperative defect size mapping, Pre- and post-operative monitoring and management of comorbidities were done. Early and late complications was noted. Patients were followed up for 9 months.


 


Results: In our study maximum patients in both male and female sex were of age group 61–75 year (36 %) with male to female sex ratio 3:2. Most common clinical finding were swelling (100%) and pain abdomen (72%). Co-morbidity present in our patients was COPD (20%), hypertension (20%) and diabetes mellitus (16%). Risk factor linked to post-operative complications seen were obesity (32% of cases), smoking (24%), diabetes (16%) and anemia (16%). In our study 20 % of cases were of spontaneous ventral hernia and 80 % of cases were of incisional hernia. The Size of defect varied from 9–16 × 6–10 cm² (length × width). In this study post-operative complications occurred in about 32% of cases. Seroma and SSI were in 12 % of cases and 4% of cases had paralytic ileus and pneumonia. The average duration of hospital stay in our study is about 5–15 days. ACST with mesh augmentation was found to be feasible with all 25 operated patient with 0% mortality and 0% hernial recurrence rate with 9 months follow up.


 


Conclusion: In conclusion, CST with onlay mesh repair is an effective method in managing large ventral hernias, especially in midline defects, with low morbidity and recurrence rate and manageable complication rates despite the co morbidities, as seen in our patient population. This technique can restore abdominal wall functionality for defects up to 20 cm in transverse dimension at the level of the umbilicus.

Abstract 0 | Pdf Downloads 0

References

1. Muysoms FE, Miserez M, Berrevoet F, Campanelli G, Champault GG, Chelala E, et al. Classification of primary and incisional abdominal wall hernias. Hernia 2009;13:407:
2. Andersen LP, Klein M, Gögenur I, Rosenberg J. Long term recurrence and complication rates after incisional hernia repair with the open onlay technique. BMC Surg 2009;9:6.
3. Nieuwenhuizen J, Halm JA, Jeekel J, Lange JF. Natural course of incisional hernia and indications for repair. Scand J Surg 2007;96:293‑6.
4. Mudge M, Hughes LE. Incisional hernia: A 10 year prospective study of incidence and attitudes. Br J Surg 1985;72:70-1
5. Cassar K, Munro A. Surgical treatment of incisional hernia. Br J Surg 2002;89: 534–45
6. Paul A, Korenkov M, Peters S, et al. Unacceptable results of the Mayo proce- dure for repair of abdominal incisional hernias. Eur J Surg 1998;164:361–7.
7. Flum DR, Horvath K, Koepsell T. Have outcomes of incisional hernia repair improved with time? A population-based analysis. Ann Surg 2003;237:129–35.
8. Korenkov M, Sauerland S, Arndt M, et al. Randomized clinical trial of suture repair, polypropylene mesh or autodermal hernioplasty for incisional hernia. Br J Surg 2002;89:50–6.
9. Wheeler AA, Matz ST, Bachman SL, et al. Retrorectus polyester mesh repair for midline ventral hernias. Hernia 2009;13:597–603.
10. Burger JW, Luijendijk RW, Hop WC, et al. Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of suture versus mesh repair of incisional hernia. Ann Surg 2004; 240:578–83.
11. Luijendijk RW, Hop WC, van den Tol MP, et al. A comparison of suture repair with mesh repair for incisional hernia. N Engl J Med 2000;343(6):392–8.
12. Koller R, Miholic J, Jakl RJ. Repair of incisional hernias with expanded polytetra- fluoroethylene. Eur J Surg 1997;163:261–6.
13. de Vries Reilingh TS, van Goor H, Charbon JA, et al. Repair of giant midline abdominal wall hernias: “components separation technique” versus prosthetic repair: interim analysis of a randomized controlled trial. World J Surg 2007;31: 756–63.
14. Cobb WS, Kercher KW, Heniford BT. Laparoscopic repair of incisional hernias. Surg Clin North Am 2005;85(1):91–103.
15. Jin J, Rosen MJ. Laparoscopic versus open ventral hernia repair. Surg Clin North Am 2008;88:1083–100.
16. Klinge U, Conze J, Krones C, et al. Incisional hernia: open techniques. World J Surg 2005;29:1066–72.
17. Hultman CS, Tong WM, Kittinger BJ, et al. Management of recurrent hernia after components separation: 10-year experience with abdominal wall reconstruction at an academic medical center. Ann Plast Surg 2011;66:504–7
18. Ko JH, Wang EC, Salvay DM, et al. Abdominal wall reconstruction: lessons learned from 200 “components separation” procedures. Arch Surg 2009;144: 1047–55.
19. Saulis AS, Dumanian GA. Periumbilical rectus abdominis perforator preserva- tion significantly reduces superficial wound complications in “separation of parts” hernia repairs. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002;109:2275–80.
20. Torregrosa-Gallud A, Sancho Muriel J, Bueno-Lledó J, García Pastor P, Iserte-Hernandez J, Bonafé-Diana S, Carreño-Sáenz O, Carbonell-Tatay F. Modified components separation technique: experience treating large, complex ventral hernias at a University Hospital. Hernia. 2017 Aug;21(4):601-608. doi: 10.1007/s10029-017-1619-6. Epub 2017 May 9. PMID: 28488072.
21. Kulah B, KulacogluIH, Oruc MT, Duzgun AP, Moran M, Ozmen MM, et al. Presentation and outcome of incarcerated external hernias in adults. Am J Surg. 2001;181(2):101-4.
22. Chavan, Shahaji G. et al. Incidence of incisional hernia with respect to different sites and causes. International Surgery Journal, [S.l.], v. 7, n. 8, p. 2539-2543, july 2020. ISSN 2349-2902.
23. Soliman A. El Shakhsa , Ahmed M. Fawzya , Bahaa A. Mashaal. The  anterior rectus abdominis sheath flap for fascial closure in burst abdomen and midline incisional hernia. Menoufia Med J 29:549–553 2016
24. Ko, Jason & Wang, Edward & Salvay, David & Paul, Benjamin & Dumanian, Gregory. (2009). Abdominal Wall Reconstruction Lessons Learned From 200 "Components Separation" Procedures. 1047-1055. Sailes FC, Walls J, Guelig D, et al. Synthetic and biological mesh in component separation: a 10-year single institution review. Ann Plast Surg 2010;64(5): 696–8.
25. Punjani, R., Shaikh, I., & Soni, V. (2015). Component Separation Technique: an Effective Way of Treating Large Ventral Hernia. The Indian journal of surgery, 77(Suppl 3), 1476–1479. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-015-1265-0
26. Abulezz T. Components Separation Technique (CST) in Reconstruction of Large and Complex Abdominal Wall Defects. Clin Surg. 2017; 2: 1816.
27. Mohamed Samir, Mohamed Hany, Mohamed Ibrahim. Evaluation of component separation technique in the repair of complex large ventral hernia with large defects. The Egyptian Journal of Surgery 2015, 34:272–275.

Most read articles by the same author(s)