A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON LATERAL INTERNAL SPHINCTEROTOMY V/S LORD’S DILATATION IN CHRONIC FISSURE IN ANO PATIENT

Main Article Content

Dr. Shubhangee Garg
Dr. Shalabh Gupta
Dr. Amit kumar

Keywords

Chronic anal fissure, Lateral internal sphincterotomy (LIS), Lord's dilatation, Surgical treatment comparison, Fissure healing rates

Abstract

Introduction: Anal fissures are elongated ulcers in the anal canal that cause significant discomfort and impact daily activities when they become chronic. These fissures are commonly treated with surgeries such as lateral internal sphincterotomy (LIS) and lord’s anal dilatation, each presenting unique challenges and outcomes. This study focused on comparing these surgical techniques to determine the most effective approach for treating chronic anal fissures.


Aim and Objective: This study aimed to comparison the effectiveness, outcomes, and potential complications associated between LIS and Lord's dilatation in treatment of chronic fissure in Ano. Methodology: This prospective observational study was conducted at western up,120 patients were taken who diagnosed with chronic anal fissure and divided into two groups for either LIS or Lord's dilatation. The outcomes were measured through various methods including pain scales, healing rates and complication records over a follow-up period of three months. Data analysis was performed using SPSS software, focusing on statistical significance of the results obtained.


Results: Both LIS and Lord's dilatation proved effective in treating chronic anal fissures, but with different efficacy profiles. LIS showed higher healing rates (95% at 1 month, 98.3% at 3 months) and lower recurrence rates (1.7% at 3 months) compared to Lord's dilatation. Lord's dilatation reported slightly higher immediate postoperative pain relief than LIS. Complications were minimal and comparable between both the groups. Overall patient improvement was better in the LIS group, correlating with the lower incidence of complications and better long-term outcomes.  


Conclusion: The study concludes that both procedures were viable, LIS may offer a better overall treatment profile in terms of healing rates and recurrence, supporting its preferential use in clinical settings for chronic anal fissure.

Abstract 0 | Pdf Downloads 0

References

1. Arroyo A, Pérez F, Serrano P, Candela F, Lacueva J, Calpena R. Surgical versus chemical (botulinum toxin) sphincterotomy for chronic anal fissure: long-term results of a prospective randomized clinical and manometric study. The American journal of surgery. 2005;189(4):429-34.
2. American Gastroenterological Association. American Gastroenterological Association medical position statement: diagnosis and care of patients with anal fissure. Gastroenterology. 2003;124(1):233-4.
3. Weaver RM, Ambrose NS, Alexander-Williams J, Keighley MR. Manual dilatation of the anus vs. lateral subcutaneous sphincterotomy in the treatment of chronic fissure-in-ano: results of a prospective, randomized, clinical trial. Diseases of the colon & rectum. 1987;30(6):420-3.
4. Verma R, Prajapati P, Kumar P. Comparative study of laser versus open lateral internal sphincterotomy in the treatment of anal fissure. Asian Journal of Medical Sciences. 2023 Nov 1;14(11):287-92.
5. Aljabery RM. Comparison between Lord Dilitation Versus Lateral Internal Sphincterotomy for Management Post Hemorrhoidectomy Pain and Stenosis. Indian Journal of Public Health Research & Development. 2020 Jan 31;11(1):1730-4.
6. Zafar A, Rehman A, Khan MI. Chronic anal fissures-association with sentinel skin tag. Rawal Medical Journal. 1970 Jan 1;35(2):177-177.
7. Nelson RL. Chronic Anal Fissures. Am Fam Physician. 2016 Mar 15;93(6):498-9.
8. Kang GS, Kim BS, Choi PS, Kang DW. Evaluation of Healing and Complications After Lateral Internal Sphincterotomy for Chronic Anal Fissure: Marginal Suture of Incisionvs. Open Left Incision: Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study. Diseases of the colon & rectum. 2008 Mar 1;51(3):329-33.
9. Stewart Sr DB, Gaertner W, Glasgow S, Migaly J, Feingold D, Steele SR. Clinical practice guideline for the management of anal fissures. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. 2017 Jan 1;60(1):7-14.

Most read articles by the same author(s)