ENHANCING PATIENT SAFETY THROUGH STRUCTURED AND DOCUMENTED HANDOVER FOR ANAESTHESIA TRANSFERS: A SIMULATION-BASED QUALITY IMPROVEMENT INITIATIVE.
Main Article Content
Keywords
Patient safety, SBAR, simulation training, handover, interprofessional communication, quality improvement, medical education
Abstract
Background: Communication failures during patient handovers represent a critical threat to patient safety, particularly during high-risk transitions from operating theatres to intensive care units. Despite widespread recognition of this problem, standardized approaches to handover training remain inconsistently implemented across healthcare institutions.
Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of a comprehensive simulation-based educational intervention utilizing the SBAR (Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation) framework and ISOBAR checklist in improving anesthesia-to-ICU handover quality, communication completeness, and healthcare provider confidence.
Methods: A prospective, quasi-experimental pre-post study was conducted over 3 months in a tertiary care academic hospital. Fifty-seven healthcare providers participated in a multi-component intervention including structured educational sessions, standardized in-situ simulation scenarios, and systematic debriefing. Primary outcomes were measured using the pre validated SBAR-LA rubric, checklist adherence rates, and self- confidence scores. Qualitative feedback was analyzed thematically.
Results: SBAR-LA scores demonstrated significant improvement from pre- intervention (mean 10.8, SD 3.6) to post-intervention (mean 15.8, SD 3.0; p < 0.001, Cohen's d = 1.5). . Checklist adherence increased from 58% to 88% (p < 0.01), while self-confidence scores improved from 2.9 to 4.2 (p < 0.001). Qualitative analysis revealed enhanced awareness of structured communication protocols, improved interprofessional coordination, identification of previous communication gaps, and high perceived value of simulation-based learning.
Conclusion: This simulation-based intervention significantly enhanced the quality and completeness of anaesthesia-to-ICU handovers. The integration of validated assessment tools facilitated objective evaluation and supported sustainable team-based learning. These findings support broader implementation of structured handover training as a critical patient safety initiative.
References
2. .Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
4. .Davis, B. P., Aghajanian, S., Agrawal, R., & Barnabei, R. (2021). SBAR-LA: SBAR Brief Assessment Rubric for Learner Assessment. MedEdPORTAL, 17, 11128.
5. Davis, B. P., Lozano, L., Rodriguez, M., & Thompson, R. (2023). SBAR Education for Health Care Students: Assessment of a Training Program. MedEdPORTAL, 19, 11289.
6. Gordon, M., Darbyshire, D., & Baker, P. (2013). Non-technical skills training to enhance patient safety: A systematic review. Medical Education, 47(11), 1042-1054.
7. Haig, K. M., Sutton, S., & Whittington, J. (2006). SBAR: A shared mental model for improving communication between clinicians. Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, 32(3), 167- 175.
8. Institute for Healthcare Improvement. (2017). SBAR Communication Technique. Cambridge, MA: Institute for Healthcare Improvement.
9. Issenberg, S. B., McGaghie, W. C., Petrusa, E. R., Lee Gordon, D., & Scalese, R. J. (2005). Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: A BEME systematic review. Medical Teacher, 27(1), 10-28.
10. Joy, B. F., Elliott, E., Hardy, C., Sullivan, C., Backer, C. L., & Kane, J. M. (2011). Standardized multidisciplinary protocol improves handover of cardiac surgery patients to the intensive care unit. Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, 12(3), 304-308.
11. Keebler, J. R., Lazzara, E. H., Patzer, B. S., Palmer, E. M., Plummer, J. P., Smith, D. C., ... & Riss, R. (2016). Meta-analyses of the effects of standardized handoff protocols on patient, provider, and organizational outcomes. Human Factors, 58(8), 1187-1205.
12. Kirkpatrick, D. L., & Kirkpatrick, J. D. (2016). Evaluating Training Programs: The Four Levels (3rd ed.). Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
13. McGaghie, W. C., Issenberg, S. B., Cohen, E. R., Barsuk, J. H., & Wayne, D. B. (2010). Does simulation- based medical education with deliberate practice yield better results than traditional clinical education? A meta- analytic comparative review of the evidence. Academic Medicine, 86(6), 706-711.
14. Petrovic, M. A., Aboumatar, H., Scholl, A. T., Krenzischek, D. A., Camp, M. S., Senger, C. M., ... & Martinez, E.A. (2012).
15. The perioperative handoff protocol: Evaluating impacts on handoff defects and provider satisfaction in adult perianesthesia care units. Journal of Clinical Anesthesia, 24(4), 293-299.
16. Riesenberg, L. A., Leitzsch, J., & Massucci, J. L. (2010). Residents' and attending physicians' handoffs: A systematic review of the literature. Academic Medicine, 85(12), 1973-1978.
17. Riesenberg, L. A., Leitzsch, J., & Little, B. W. (2009). Systematic review of handoff mnemonics literature.American Journal of Medical Quality, 24(3), 196-204.
18. Rosen, M. A., Hunt, E. A., Pronovost, P. J., Federowicz, M. A., & Weaver, S. J. (2012). In situ simulation in continuing education for the health care professions: A systematic review. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 32(4), 243-254.
19. Starmer, A. J., Spector, N. D., Srivastava, R., West, D. C., Rosenbluth, G., Allen, A. D., ... & Sectish, T. C. (2014). Changes in medical errors after implementation of a handoff program. New England Journal of Medicine, 371(19), 1803-1812.
20. The Joint Commission. (2017). Sentinel Event Data: Root Causes by Event Type 2004-2015. Oakbrook Terrace, IL: The Joint Commission.
21. Wilson, S., Rotter, T., Kinsman, L., Machotta, A., Rowe, R., Yamamoto, L., & Ewan, V. (2018). Effects of structured handover from anaesthesia to intensive care on patient safety: A systematic review. Intensive Care Medicine, 44(1), 1-12.
