ENHANCING PATIENT SAFETY THROUGH STRUCTURED AND DOCUMENTED HANDOVER FOR ANAESTHESIA TRANSFERS: A SIMULATION-BASED QUALITY IMPROVEMENT INITIATIVE.

Main Article Content

Dr. Archana Shivashankar
Dr. Sarika M. Shetty
Dr. Meghana Marulasiddappa

Keywords

Patient safety, SBAR, simulation training, handover, interprofessional communication, quality improvement, medical education

Abstract

Background: Communication failures during patient handovers represent a critical threat to patient safety, particularly during high-risk transitions from operating theatres to intensive care units. Despite widespread recognition of this problem, standardized approaches to handover training remain inconsistently implemented across healthcare institutions.


Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of a comprehensive simulation-based educational intervention utilizing the SBAR (Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation) framework and ISOBAR checklist in improving anesthesia-to-ICU handover quality, communication completeness, and healthcare provider confidence.


Methods: A prospective, quasi-experimental pre-post study was conducted over 3 months in a tertiary care academic hospital. Fifty-seven healthcare providers participated in a multi-component intervention including structured educational sessions, standardized in-situ simulation scenarios, and systematic debriefing. Primary outcomes were measured using the pre validated SBAR-LA rubric, checklist adherence rates, and self- confidence scores. Qualitative feedback was analyzed thematically.


Results: SBAR-LA scores demonstrated significant improvement from pre- intervention (mean 10.8, SD 3.6) to post-intervention (mean 15.8, SD 3.0; p < 0.001, Cohen's d = 1.5). . Checklist adherence increased from 58% to 88% (p < 0.01), while self-confidence scores improved from 2.9 to 4.2 (p < 0.001). Qualitative analysis revealed enhanced awareness of structured communication protocols, improved interprofessional coordination, identification of previous communication gaps, and high perceived value of simulation-based learning.


Conclusion: This simulation-based intervention significantly enhanced the quality and completeness of anaesthesia-to-ICU handovers. The integration of validated assessment tools facilitated objective evaluation and supported sustainable team-based learning. These findings support broader implementation of structured handover training as a critical patient safety initiative.


 

Abstract 18 | PDF Downloads 1

References

1. .Boat, A. C., & Spaeth, J. P. (2013). Handoff checklists improve inter-professional postoperative patient transfers: A randomized controlled trial. American Journal of Surgery, 206(4), 494-501.
2. .Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
4. .Davis, B. P., Aghajanian, S., Agrawal, R., & Barnabei, R. (2021). SBAR-LA: SBAR Brief Assessment Rubric for Learner Assessment. MedEdPORTAL, 17, 11128.
5. Davis, B. P., Lozano, L., Rodriguez, M., & Thompson, R. (2023). SBAR Education for Health Care Students: Assessment of a Training Program. MedEdPORTAL, 19, 11289.
6. Gordon, M., Darbyshire, D., & Baker, P. (2013). Non-technical skills training to enhance patient safety: A systematic review. Medical Education, 47(11), 1042-1054.
7. Haig, K. M., Sutton, S., & Whittington, J. (2006). SBAR: A shared mental model for improving communication between clinicians. Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, 32(3), 167- 175.
8. Institute for Healthcare Improvement. (2017). SBAR Communication Technique. Cambridge, MA: Institute for Healthcare Improvement.
9. Issenberg, S. B., McGaghie, W. C., Petrusa, E. R., Lee Gordon, D., & Scalese, R. J. (2005). Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: A BEME systematic review. Medical Teacher, 27(1), 10-28.
10. Joy, B. F., Elliott, E., Hardy, C., Sullivan, C., Backer, C. L., & Kane, J. M. (2011). Standardized multidisciplinary protocol improves handover of cardiac surgery patients to the intensive care unit. Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, 12(3), 304-308.
11. Keebler, J. R., Lazzara, E. H., Patzer, B. S., Palmer, E. M., Plummer, J. P., Smith, D. C., ... & Riss, R. (2016). Meta-analyses of the effects of standardized handoff protocols on patient, provider, and organizational outcomes. Human Factors, 58(8), 1187-1205.
12. Kirkpatrick, D. L., & Kirkpatrick, J. D. (2016). Evaluating Training Programs: The Four Levels (3rd ed.). Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
13. McGaghie, W. C., Issenberg, S. B., Cohen, E. R., Barsuk, J. H., & Wayne, D. B. (2010). Does simulation- based medical education with deliberate practice yield better results than traditional clinical education? A meta- analytic comparative review of the evidence. Academic Medicine, 86(6), 706-711.
14. Petrovic, M. A., Aboumatar, H., Scholl, A. T., Krenzischek, D. A., Camp, M. S., Senger, C. M., ... & Martinez, E.A. (2012).
15. The perioperative handoff protocol: Evaluating impacts on handoff defects and provider satisfaction in adult perianesthesia care units. Journal of Clinical Anesthesia, 24(4), 293-299.
16. Riesenberg, L. A., Leitzsch, J., & Massucci, J. L. (2010). Residents' and attending physicians' handoffs: A systematic review of the literature. Academic Medicine, 85(12), 1973-1978.
17. Riesenberg, L. A., Leitzsch, J., & Little, B. W. (2009). Systematic review of handoff mnemonics literature.American Journal of Medical Quality, 24(3), 196-204.
18. Rosen, M. A., Hunt, E. A., Pronovost, P. J., Federowicz, M. A., & Weaver, S. J. (2012). In situ simulation in continuing education for the health care professions: A systematic review. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 32(4), 243-254.
19. Starmer, A. J., Spector, N. D., Srivastava, R., West, D. C., Rosenbluth, G., Allen, A. D., ... & Sectish, T. C. (2014). Changes in medical errors after implementation of a handoff program. New England Journal of Medicine, 371(19), 1803-1812.
20. The Joint Commission. (2017). Sentinel Event Data: Root Causes by Event Type 2004-2015. Oakbrook Terrace, IL: The Joint Commission.
21. Wilson, S., Rotter, T., Kinsman, L., Machotta, A., Rowe, R., Yamamoto, L., & Ewan, V. (2018). Effects of structured handover from anaesthesia to intensive care on patient safety: A systematic review. Intensive Care Medicine, 44(1), 1-12.