A PROSPECTIVE STUDY TO EVALUATE MORTALITY, MORBIDITY, AND RISK FACTORS IN INTESTINAL RESECTION AND ANASTOMOSIS PATIENTS AT A TERTIARY CARE CENTRE OF WESTERN RAJASTHAN
Main Article Content
Keywords
Anastomotic leak, Dehiscence, Intestinal anastomosis, Risk factors, Diabetes mellitus, Morbidity
Abstract
Morbidity and mortality following intestinal anastomosis are often attributed to anastomotic dehiscence. The reported incidence of anastomotic leaks ranges from 0.5% to 30%, with an associated mortality rate of 10%–15%. Multiple risk factors have been implicated. This study aimed to evaluate the morbidity, mortality and risk factors contributing to anastomotic dehiscence in patients undergoing intestinal resection and anastomosis.
Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted from March 2018 to February 2021 in the Department of General Surgery at Dr. S.N. Medical College, Jodhpur, Rajasthan. All patients undergoing hand-sewn gastrointestinal anastomosis, including both elective and emergency procedures, were included. A total of 43 patients were evaluated for morbidity, mortality, and associated risk factors.
Results: Anastomotic leaks were observed in 3 out of 43 patients (6.97%). The overall mortality rate was 11.63%. Increasing age was not significantly associated with leakage (p = 0.40), although a 20% leak rate was noted in the 51–60 years age group. Gender distribution showed no significant association. Among the evaluated risk factors, only diabetes mellitus was significantly associated with anastomotic dehiscence (p = 0.019). Other factors such as elevated serum creatinine, hyperbilirubinemia, and emergency surgery were not statistically significant.
Conclusions: Diabetes mellitus emerged as the only significant risk factor associated with anastomotic leaks. Other traditionally recognized risk factors were not statistically significant in this study. Optimized perioperative glycaemic control may help reduce anastomotic dehiscence and improve patient outcomes
References
2. Albucasis. On Surgery and Instruments, translated by M. Spink and G.L. Lewis. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1973.
3. Duverger, G. 1739. Théorie et pratique des opérations de chirurgie. Paris: Chez Pierre-François Didot.
4. Travers, B. 1812. An Inquiry Concerning the Process of Nature in Repairing Injuries of the Intestines. London: Longman Publishing.
5. Czerny, V. 1880. “Colorectal Anastomosis with Double-Layer Technique.” Archiv für Klinische Chirurgie 25: 422–430.
6. Halsted, William S. 1887. “Circular Suture of the Intestine: An Experimental Study.” American Journal of the Medical Sciences 94: 436–461.
7. Hyman, Norman, et al. 2007. “Anastomotic Leaks After Intestinal Anastomosis: It’s Later Than You Think.” Annals of Surgery 245 (2): 254–58. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000225083.27182.85.
8. Saha, B. C., et al. 2006. “Anastomotic Leak Rates and Risk Factors.” Dis Colon Rectum 49 (11): 1719–25.
9. Lujan, José, and Elena Trencheva. 2015. “Leak and Mortality Rates in Colorectal Anastomosis.” Colorectal Dis 17 (7): 595–600.
10. Trencheva, Elena. 2014. “Outcomes Following Colorectal Anastomosis.” Surg Today 44 (8): 1481–85.
11. Irvin, G. L., et al. 1995. “Age-Related Risk of Anastomotic Dehiscence.” J Surg Res 58 (2): 235–42.
12. Vignali, Andrea, Victor W. Fazio, Ian C. Lavery, Jeffrey W. Milsom, James M. Church, Tracy L. Hull, Scott A. Strong, and John R. Oakley. 1997. “Factors Associated with the Occurrence of Leaks in Stapled Rectal Anastomoses: A Review of 1,014 Patients.” Journal of the American College of Surgeons 185 (2): 105–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1072-7515(97)00018-5.
13. Cooke, David T., Gary C. Lin, Carmen L. Lau, Lin Zhang, Michael-Si Si, Jennifer Lee, et al. 2009. “Analysis of Cervical Esophagogastric Anastomotic Leaks After Transhiatal Esophagectomy: Risk Factors, Presentation, and Detection.” Annals of Thoracic Surgery 88 (1): 175–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.04.004.
14. Turrentine, Frank E., Charles E. Denlinger, V. Bruce Simpson, Russell A. Garwood, Suzanne Guerlain, Amitabh Agrawal, et al. 2015. “Morbidity, Mortality, Cost, and Survival Estimates of Gastrointestinal Anastomotic Leaks.” Journal of the American College of Surgeons 220 (2): 195–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.11.002.
15. Hayden, Daniel M., Maria C. Mora Pinzon, Anthony B. Francescatti, and Theodore J. Saclarides. 2015. “Patient Factors May Predict Anastomotic Complications After Rectal Cancer Surgery: Anastomotic Complications in Rectal Cancer.” Annals of Medicine and Surgery 4 (1): 11–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2014.12.001.
16. Farghaly, A., M. Ammar, A. Algammal, and A. Arafa. 2019. “Risk Factors for Leak in Emergent Small Bowel Anastomosis.” Menoufia Medical Journal 32 (2): 574–580. https://doi.org/10.4103/mmj.mmj_379_17.
17. Nair, Amit, Dinker R. Pai, and S. Jagdish. 2006. “Predicting Anastomotic Disruption after Emergent Small Bowel Surgery.” Digestive Surgery 23 (1–2): 38–43. https://doi.org/10.1159/000093493.
18. Lavanya, N. R., and T. Janardhana. 2020. “A Prospective Study to Understand the Risk Factors for Anastomotic Leak in Small Bowel Anastomosis.” Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences 9 (19): 1549–1553. https://doi.org/10.14260/jemds/2020/1549.
19. Raghunandan, R. 2020. “Resection and Anastomosis of Bowel in Our Surgical Practice.” Academia Journal of Surgery 3 (1). https://doi.org/10.47008/ajs/2020.3.1.1. pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov+6
