The effect of pH-buffering on lignocaine's anesthetic properties during Inferior alveolar nerve block in children: A randomised controlled trial
Main Article Content
Keywords
buffered local anesthesia, painless pediatric dentistry, adrenochrome
Abstract
Introduction: Pain management during local anesthesia administration is a critical aspect of pediatric dentistry, as procedures like Inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) are often associated with significant discomfort. Buffered local anesthetics, which adjust the pH of the solution to a more physiological range, have been proposed as a method to reduce pain and accelerate the onset of anesthesia.
Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of pH-buffered lignocaine compared to standard lignocaine in terms of pain perception, onset time, and efficacy during dental procedures in children.
Materials and Methods: A prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted with 30 children aged 6–10 years who required bilateral inferior alveolar nerve blocks. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either 2% lignocaine with epinephrine or buffered lignocaine prepared by mixing sodium bicarbonate with lignocaine in a 1:10 ratio. Pain perception was assessed using the Wong-Baker Faces Pain Scale and SEM scale, while onset and efficacy of anesthesia were evaluated through subjective (numbness) and objective (gingival probing) measures. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software.
Results: Buffered lignocaine demonstrated significantly lower Wong-Baker pain scores (2.54 ± 1.35) compared to standard lignocaine (3.20 ± 1.05; p=0.007). The onset of anesthesia was faster with buffered lignocaine (60.00 ± 10.38 seconds) compared to standard lignocaine (73.63 ± 13.45 seconds; p=0.012). Efficacy measures also favoured buffered lignocaine, showing faster achievement of maximum anesthetic effect (75.00 ± 15.35 seconds vs. 85.63 ± 12.37 seconds; p=0.018).
Conclusion: Buffered lignocaine is a more effective alternative to standard lignocaine for pediatric dental procedures, offering reduced pain and faster onset of anesthesia. Further studies are recommended to optimize preparation methods and storage conditions for buffered anesthetic solutions.
References
2. Dhake P, Nagpal D, Chaudhari P, Lamba G, Hotwani K, Singh P. Buffered articaine infiltration for primary maxillary molar extractions: a randomized controlled study. Journal of dental anesthesia and pain medicine. 2022 Oct;22(5):387.
3. Malamed SF, Tavana S, Falkel M. Faster onset and more comfortable injection with alkalinized 2% lidocaine with epinephrine 1: 100,000. Compendium of Continuing Education in Dentistry (15488578). 2013 Feb 2.
4. Chopra R, Jindal G, Sachdev V, Sandhu M. Double-blind crossover study to compare pain experience during inferior alveolar nerve block administration using buffered two percent lidocaine in children. Pediatric Dentistry. 2016 Feb 15;38(1):25-9.
5. Gandhi N, Shah N, Wahjuningrum DA, Purnomo S, Nooshian R, Arora S, Pawar AM. Evaluation of pulpal anesthesia and injection pain using IANB with pre-heated, buffered and conventional 2% lignocaine in teeth with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis—a randomized clinical study. PeerJ. 2022 Oct 19;10:e14187.
6. Guo J, Yin K, Roges R, Enciso R. Efficacy of sodium bicarbonate buffered versus non-buffered lidocaine with epinephrine in inferior alveolar nerve block: A meta-analysis. Journal of dental anesthesia and pain medicine. 2018 Jun;18(3):129-42.
7. Kattan S, Lee SM, Hersh EV, Karabucak B. Do buffered local anesthetics provide more successful anesthesia than nonbuffered solutions in patients with pulpally involved teeth requiring dental therapy?: A systematic review. The Journal of the American Dental Association. 2019 Mar 1;150(3):165-77.
8. Aulestia‐Viera PV, Braga MM, Borsatti MA. The effect of adjusting the pH of local anaesthetics in dentistry: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. International Endodontic Journal. 2018 Aug;51(8):862-76.
9. Kumar M, Batra R, Chopra S, Verma G, Aggarwal A, Garg A (2015) Role of alkalinization in enhancing efficacy of the local anesthetic – a clinical study. Indian Journal of Dental Sciences 7, 24–7.
10. Cepeda MS, Tzortzopoulou A, Thackrey M, Hudcova J, Arora Gandhi P, Schumann R (2010) Adjusting the pH of lidocaine for reducing pain on injection. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cd006581.
11. Wright GZ, Weinberger SJ, Marti R, Plotzke O. The effectiveness of infiltration anesthesia in the mandibular primary molar region. Pediatr Dent 1991; 13: 278-83.
12. Wong DL, Baker CM. Pain in children: comparison of assessment scales. Pediatr Nurs 1988; 14: 9-17.
13. Whitcomb M, Drum M, Reader A, Nusstein J, Beck M. A prospective, randomized, double-blind study of the anesthetic efficacy of sodium bicarbonate buffered 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine in inferior alveolar nerve blocks. Anesth Prog 2010; 57: 59-66.
14. Hobeich P, Simon S, Schneiderman E, He J. A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of the injection pain and anesthetic onset of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,00 epinephrine buffered with 5% and 10% sodium bicarbonate in maxillary infiltrations. J Endod 2013; 39: 597-9.
15. Chow MY, Sia AT, Koay CK, Chan YW. Alkalinization of lidocaine does not hasten the onset of axillary brachial plexus block. Anesth Analg 1998; 86: 566-8.
16. Pascuet, E., Donnelly, R. F., Garceau, D., & Vaillancourt, R. (2009). Buffered lidocaine hydrochloride solution with and without epinephrine: stability in polypropylene syringes. The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy, 62(5), 375–380.
17. Kashyap VM, Desai R, Reddy PB, Menon S. Effect of alkalinisation of lignocaine for intraoral nerve block on pain during injection, and speed of onset of anaesthesia. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;49:e72–e75. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2011.04.068.
18. Afsal MM, Khatri A, Kalra N, Tyagi R, Khandelwal D. Pain perception and efficacy of local analgesia using 2% lignocaine, buffered lignocaine, and 4% articaine in pediatric dental procedures. Journal of dental anesthesia and pain medicine. 2019 Apr 1;19(2):101-9.
Article Sidebar
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
All articles published in JPTCP are licensed under Copyright Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Dr. Harsha Kewlani
Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, College of Dental Sciences and Research Centre, Bopal, Ahmedabad, India-382115
Dr. Anup Panda
Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, College of Dental Sciences and Research Centre, Bopal, Ahmedabad, India-382115
Dr. Jina Jani
Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, College of Dental Sciences and Research Centre, Bopal, Ahmedabad, India-382115
Dr. Vaidehi Patel
Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, College of Dental Sciences and Research Centre, Bopal, Ahmedabad, India-382115
Dr. Radhika Valera
Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, College of Dental Sciences and Research Centre, Bopal, Ahmedabad, India-382115