VISUAL IMPROVEMENTS AND CORNEAL STABILIZATION FOLLOWING CORNEAL CROSS-LINKING (CXL) IN PATIENTS WITH KERATOCONUS: AN OBSERVATIONAL PROSPECTIVE STUDY.
Main Article Content
Keywords
Keratoconus, Cross-linking, Visual acuity, Corneal topography
Abstract
Background: Corneal cross-linking (CXL) is a well-established treatment that halts the progression of keratoconus, a disease characterized by an irregular curvature and thinning of the cornea. The method strengthens corneal biomechanical rigidity through a photochemical interaction between riboflavin (vitamin B2) and UV-A light irradiation, thereby stabilizing the corneal structure. Although CXL is primarily used to halt disease progression, many patients also experience improvements in corneal curvature and visual acuity.
Objectives: to evaluate the 12-month visual and topographical outcomes in patients with keratoconus treated with corneal cross-linking, by measuring uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), corneal topography, and maximum keratometry (K-max).
Study Design: An observational prospective study.
Place and Duration of study: Department of Ophthalmology, Gaju Khan Medical College, Sawabi. The study was carried out over one year, from January 2023 to January 2024.
Methods: In this prospective study, 100 patients diagnosed with progressive keratoconus were recruited to evaluate the outcomes of CXL. Postoperative parameters were analyzed at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months, including K-max, corneal topography, UDVA, and CDVA. Topography was performed using a standardized topography system. Quantitative data analysis was performed using paired t-tests, and a p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results: There were 100 patients (62 men and 38 women), with a mean age of 24.6 ± 4.8 years. Both UDVA and CDVA improved significantly over the 12-month follow-up period. The mean K-max decreased from a preoperative value of 54.2 ± 3.1 D to 52.5 ± 3.0 D postoperatively (p = 0.002). Seventy-two percent of patients showed stabilization or improvement in both keratometric and visual parameters. There were no instances of keratoconus progression and no serious adverse effects.
Conclusion: Corneal cross-linking is successful in halting the progression of keratoconus and, for a significant number of patients, yields meaningful improvement in visual function. Corneal flattening and improved vision were observed in most subjects. The procedure demonstrated a favourable safety profile with no significant complications. The most favourable outcomes were seen in patients treated at an early stage of the disease. CXL remains a cornerstone in the management and visual rehabilitation of keratoconus, especially when used in the early phase.
References
2. Simonov I, Or L, Gait I, Dubinsky-Pretzel B, Ado D, Pars E, Hartstein M, Lifshitz AE. Seven years follow-up of corneal cross-linking (CXL) in pediatric patients: evaluation of treated and untreated eye. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2022; 32(3):1482–1490. Doi: 10.1177/1120672120958031
3. Tholvsen M, Makhdoomi K. The impact of interrupted corneal collagen cross linking (CXL) treatment. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2024; 262(11):3643–3648. Doi: 10.1007/ s00417-024-06557-0
4. Wollensak G, Spoerl E, Seiler T. Riboflavin/ultraviolet-a-induced collagen crosslinking for the treatment of keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;135(5):620-7. Doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(02)02220-1
5. Raiskup F, Spoerl E. Corneal crosslinking with riboflavin and ultraviolet A. I. Principles. Ocul Surf. 2013 Jan;11(1):65-74. Doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2012.10.004.
6. Vinciguerra P, Albè E, Trazza S, et al. Refractive, topographic, tomographic, and aberrometric analysis of keratoconic eyes undergoing corneal cross-linking. Ophthalmology. 2009;116(3):369-378. Doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.09.048
7. Greenstein SA, Fry KL, Bhatt J, Hersh PS. Natural history of corneal haze after collagen crosslinking for keratoconus and corneal ectasia: Scheimpflug and biomicroscopic analysis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010;36(12):2105-2114. Doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.06.067
8. Caporossi A, Mazzotta C, Baiocchi S, Caporossi T. Long-term results of riboflavin ultraviolet a corneal collagen cross-linking for keratoconus in Italy: the Siena eye cross study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2010;149(4):585-593. Doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2009.10.021
9. Li X, Yang H, Rabinowitz YS. Keratoconus: classification scheme based on videokeratography and clinical signs. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35(9):1597-1603. Doi:10.1016/j.jcrs. 2009.03.050
10. [Additional relevant citation needed for [10]]
11. Greenstein SA, Shah VP, Fry KL, Hersh PS. Corneal thickness changes after corneal collagen crosslinking for keratoconus and corneal ectasia: one-year results. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011;37(4):691-700. Doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.10.052
12. Caporossi A, Mazzotta C, Paradiso AL, Baiocchi S, Marigliani D, Caporossi T. Transepithelial corneal collagen crosslinking for progressive keratoconus: 24-month clinical results. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013;39(8):1157-1163. Doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.03.026
13. [Additional relevant citation needed for [13]]
14. Angelopoulos P, Asimellis G. Standard versus accelerated corneal cross-linking for progressive keratoconus: a meta-analysis. J Refract Surg. 2021;37(9):626-635. Doi:10.3928/1081597X-20210610-03
15. O'Brart DP, Chan E, Samaras K, Patel P, Shah SP. A randomised, prospective study to investigate the efficacy of riboflavin/ultraviolet A (370 nm) corneal collagen cross-linkage to halt the progression of keratoconus. Br J Ophthalmol. 2011;95(11):1519-1524. Doi:10.1136/bjo.2010.196493
16. Wittig-Silva C, Chan E, Islam FM, Wu T, Whiting M, Snibson GR. A randomized, controlled trial of corneal collagen cross-linking in progressive keratoconus: three-year results. Ophthalmology. 2014;121(4):812-821. Doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.10.028
17. Li Y, Tan O, Brass R, Weiss JL, Huang D. Corneal epithelial thickness mapping by Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography in normal and keratoconic eyes. Ophthalmology. 2012;119(12):2425-2433. Doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.06.023